1 / 32

Sugar Beet Transport Efficiency Study

Sugar Beet Transport Efficiency Study. Chris Douglas, Transport & Travel Research Ltd March, 2010. Overview. Background to the Study Project Aims and Objectives Work Completed Project Findings and Key Themes Recommendations. Introduction to TTR.

idana
Download Presentation

Sugar Beet Transport Efficiency Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sugar Beet Transport Efficiency Study Chris Douglas, Transport & Travel Research Ltd March, 2010

  2. Overview • Background to the Study • Project Aims and Objectives • Work Completed • Project Findings and Key Themes • Recommendations

  3. Introduction to TTR • Specialist Sustainable Transport Consultancy founded in 1991 – 25 technical consultancy staff in UK • Specialisms – Freight and Fleet Efficiency, Energy and Environment • Haulage Industry, Freight Transport Association and Manager of DfT’s Freight Best Practice Programme

  4. Project Background • NFU and British Sugar appointed WSP and TTR in April 2009 to undertake an independent study • Study ran from April until August 2009 • Funding was provided by East of England and East Midlands Development Agencies

  5. Project Objectives • Identify the most efficient way to move 7 million tonnes of beet from 4,500 growers into 4 processing sites • Consider all options for change, ultimately leading to a more strategic approach to managing the beet supply chain for improved efficiency and cost effectiveness

  6. Project Aims and Tasks • Understand and carry out an efficiency assessment of current arrangements • Undertake consultation with those involved • Identify costs associated with current operations • Identify areas for efficiency improvements • Recommend a strategy (with Action Plans) to improve operational efficiency and reduce associated costs • Report findings and recommendations • Disseminate recommendations

  7. Work Completed • Desk Based Review (France, Germany, Denmark, Netherlands, Finland, Turkey, North America) • Face-to-Face Strategic Stakeholder Meetings (NFU, British Sugar, EMDA, DEFRA and Road Haulage Association) • Face-to-Face Grower, Grower/Haulier and Haulier Meetings

  8. Work Completed • 5 weeks of Telephone Consultation • 229 consultations (41 hauliers, 129 growers, 59 grower/hauliers) – representative sample • Consultation Events • 2 x Growers and 2 x Hauliers • Views on existing beet transport • Costs associated (operating costs and haulage rates paid) • Perceived benefits of current operation • Perceived drawbacks of current operation • Willingness to consider alternatives • Identify best practice examples

  9. Work Completed • Full Response Analysis • Measure/Model Development • Impact/Acceptability Matrix • Consultants’ Recommendations • Final Report

  10. Key Themes • Haulier role – dominant, with significant control over the operation once campaign underway • Contracts – few formal contracts exist • Grower and Haulier relationships – often long-established and static – may be a positive but transparency of costs?

  11. Key Themes • Haulage Rates • Vary significantly for comparable jobs • Lack of transparency in decoupling haulage rate from cleaning & loading rate • Annual negotiation in most cases but without formal contracts • Some cases no negotiation and haulier decides rate at end of campaign

  12. Key Themes • Planning – lack of detailed plans used throughout campaign by beet hauliers • Co-ordination – both haulage and haulage/harvesting to minimise beet left in clamp • British Sugar Co-ordination – already happens to a degree through Area Managers and some large growers and hauliers indicated preference

  13. Key Themes • Receiving hours, Queuing and Delivery Profile • 24/7 – issue of night loading decoupled from night hauling • 7 day week – short Saturday and short Sunday to smooth ramping (which requires extra vehicles currently) • 7 day week – raises issues about willingness to operate on Sundays

  14. Key Themes • Queuing at sites – inefficient use of resource. Potential for extended receiving hours (am or pm) • Zones – general feeling that 1 & 2 needed but not those later in the day • Peaks in delivery demand – ramping calls for extra vehicle demand – smooth flow through week is required

  15. Key Themes • Vehicle Fleet Profile, Utilisation & Specification • Use of smaller vehicles (4 axle rigid tippers) increases trip numbers • Vehicle utilisation during and outside of campaign – other crops and commodities or park-up? (33% vehicles deliver less than 50 loads during campaign) • Limited backloading • Age of fleet – only 10% less than 2 years old (25% pre-2000) – impact on fuel efficiency

  16. Key Themes • Efficient vehicles are light vehicles – no sleeper cabs, bull bars, horns, no need to run with full tanks – minimise kerbside weight • Use of sheeting equipment on empty tipper bodies over longer distances – fuel saving when fitted and used

  17. Key Themes • Call-up System – information to be provided as early as possible (08.30) to allow forward planning • Transport Allowance – Growers keen to get higher but widely unclear level of shortfall • Tendering for British Sugar Haulage Contracts – welcomed by larger or by consortia of smaller hauliers

  18. Key Themes • Pads • Limited size at selected processing sites • Grower investment in own pads in recent years – meaning preference for conventional cleaning/loading equipment

  19. Key Themes • Cleaning & Loading • In most cases equipment provided and co-ordinated by the haulier but some growers using own, under-utilised equipment. Also criss-crossing of haulier equipment • Maus – field size and proximity of adjacent road may dictate effectiveness

  20. Key Themes • Despite general support for the current situation, growers, hauliers and grower/hauliers all expressed a willingness to at least consider alternatives

  21. Areas for Improvements • Key is minimising mileage run and number of vehicles within the operation • Views expressed that number of vehicles and separate operations allow flexibility at peak • Also mean excess during normal operating times

  22. Areas for Improvements • Over 700 of total 2,000 vehicles transport less than 2 loads per week • 10% of loads are transported by vehicles with payloads 26 Tonnes or less • 550 vehicles are greater than 9 years old • Only 200 are less than 2 years old

  23. Objectives for Improvements • Use fewer vehicles, which are newer, cleaner and more fuel efficient • Offer more competitive, standardised rates • Have extended operating hours • Involve less queuing at peak periods at factory sites • Have more level, ‘flatlined’ delivery profiles through the week

  24. Measures and Models • Three main headings: • Best Practice Guidance • Extended Servicing Hours at Processing Sites • New Operational Structures

  25. Best Practice Guidance • Guidance on haulage rate negotiation for Growers • Guidance on efficient vehicle specification for grower/hauliers and hauliers • General operational efficiency guidance for grower/hauliers and hauliers • Guidance on grower partnerships • Guidance on haulier consortia building

  26. Extended Servicing Hours • Evenings • Mornings • Weekends, including Sundays • Relaxing later time zones

  27. New Operational Structures • Co-ordination of Harvesting and Haulage • Improved cleaning and loading efficiency – co-ordination of conventional equipment • Improved cleaning and loading efficiency – use of Maus • Formal planning and co-ordination of collection days • British Sugar formal planning and co-ordination of collection days

  28. New Operational Structures • Ex-farm grower contracts • Haulage contracts with British Sugar • Service agreements within haulage contracts (haulier performance levels, vehicle specification) • Standardised haulage rates negotiated by British Sugar and made available to growers

  29. New Operational Structures • Tendering for haulage territories by hauliers or haulage consortia • Increasing quality standards for hauliers (minimum tonnages, certification scheme)

  30. Consultants’ Recommendations • Ultimate Efficiency Model • Ex-Farm Contracts for ‘Local’ Growers • Tendering for British Sugar Haulage ‘Territories’ (negotiated rates, quality standards and service agreements) • Improved co-ordination of harvesting and haulage activity • British Sugar planning/co-ordination of beet collection • Extended delivery time windows throughout 24hr period and 7 day week

  31. Consultants’ Recommendations Ultimate Efficiency Model - Interim • Trialling of haulage ‘territory’ contract and British Sugar planning and co-ordination • Interim measure – British Sugar negotiated standardised haulage rates and contract templates • Best Practice Guidance for Growers, Hauliers and Grower/Hauliers • Fleet Efficiency & Quality Improvement Scheme

  32. What happens next? ? British Sugar to present Next Steps

More Related