320 likes | 435 Views
Dorothy Chun UC Santa Barbara INTENT Conference, Léon. A Meta-synthesis of cultura -based projects . Different Goals & Models of Telecollaboration. Goals: global and local Internationalization of education Digital literacies Linguistic, intercultural communicative competence (ICC)
E N D
Dorothy Chun UC Santa Barbara INTENT Conference, Léon A Meta-synthesis of cultura-based projects
Different Goals & Models of Telecollaboration • Goals: global and local • Internationalization of education • Digital literacies • Linguistic, intercultural communicative competence (ICC) • Models • Class to class • Tandem learning
Cultura Model’s Creators & Goals • Furstenberg, Levet & Waryn @ MIT in 1997 • Goals: • to make culture (“the silent language,” the “hidden dimension”) visible • to help students understand the values, attitudes, beliefs and concepts of another culture
Reasons for Meta Synthesis • Why? • To document many different adaptations • To provide advice for future exchanges • How? • Extensive survey sent to 30 known project leaders • Response from 18 (60% return rate)
RQ 1 What were the goalsthat led to the adoption of the Cultura model?
Participant Information Program setting L2 taught 4-year university 15 (83%) English 8 High school 2 (11 %) French2 2-year commcoll 1 (6 %) Samoan 2 Spanish2 Chinese2 Filipino1 German1 Japanese1
Expected Learning Outcomes Language skills (15) Language attitudes (2) Culture skills (7) Cultural knowledge (6) Cultural attitudes (13)
Summary: RQ1 (Goals) • External & internal motivations • Believed in the model • Language skills, confidence, motivation • Improvement in cultural knowledge, skills, awareness, and opennessto another culture
RQ 2 What were the processes in the implementationof the project that built towards the goals?
Summary: RQ 2 (Implementation) • Great variability • Only part of curriculum, sometimes extracurricular • Text-based questionnaires & forums most popular; video chats too • Mixture of L1 & L2 used • Teachers’ participation minimal • Exchanges ranged from 3-24 weeks
RQ 3 What kind of datawas gathered in order to determine whether the goals (learning outcomes) were achieved?
Data Gathered for Assessment • Online (9) • Written homework (6) • Survey, interviews (5) • Reflective reports, self-assessment (4) • In class activities (4)
Student Learning Gains Reported Language Culture
Mixed Teachers’ Impressions • Positive (10): • Culture learning • Instructional integration • Negative (2): • Student motivation/interest • Instructional alignment & integration • Mixed (3) or Neutral (4)
Positive Students’ Reactions • Positive (11): • Motivation/interest • Learning community • Language learning • Negative (1): • Lack of partners’ responsiveness • Mixed (3)
Challenges Encountered • Management and logistics (22) • Instructional alignment and integration with curriculum (14) • Student motivation/interest (5) • Technology (4)
Summary: RQ3 Data & LO • Wide variety of datagathered, both online and offline • Learning outcomes: almost as many gains in linguisticareas as in culturalareas • Overall teacher and student satisfaction • Common challenges
Recommendations • 1. Set realistic goals • Know your learners and their abilities/proficiency • Most successful with intermediateandadvanced L2 learners • Consider both linguistic and cultural gains
Recommendations • 2. Planning, planning, planning • Closecommunication • Common goals, curricular commitments • Model adaptation • Appropriate tools and activities • Flexibility • Buy-in at all levels
Recommendations • 3. Follow up on online activities • Online interaction does not ensure learning or understanding • Misunderstandings could have linguistic or cultural origins (or both) • In-depth classroom discussions are essential