1 / 34

We accept the following premises

Tools for global warming policy makers Harvey Lam, Princeton University http://www.princeton.edu/~lam. We accept the following premises. CO 2 emitted by the burning of fossil fuels is primarily responsible for the observed rise of atmospheric CO 2 content .

idola-wilkinson
Download Presentation

We accept the following premises

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tools for global warming policy makersHarvey Lam, Princeton Universityhttp://www.princeton.edu/~lam

  2. We accept the following premises • CO2 emitted by the burning of fossil fuels is primarily responsible for the observed rise of atmospheric CO2 content . • CO2 is a major greenhouse gas. • Continued and indefinite increase of CO2 can have significant adverse consequences. • The “fix” should have the consent of an informed public.

  3. Critiques of current public discourse Inadequate appreciation of the magnitude of the global warming problem. Confusion between global warming, energy independence, and air pollutions. Inadequate appreciation of the time scale of the problem. Inadequate appreciation of the role of the invisible hand of free market capitalism.

  4. Notations  t Time (years) C Atmospheric carbon content (GtC) E Annual emissions rate (GtC/yr) Cstab Stabilized C target ceiling Estab Allowed E when C=Cstab CO2 concentration: 1 ppm=2.1 GtC C(before 19th century)~286 ppm ~600 GtC

  5. At the start of the 21 century C(0)~800 GtC E(0)~8 GtC/yr dC/dt(0)~4 GtC/yr Stabilization target Cstab=1200 GtC (example) Estab=? dC/dt=0

  6. Consequences of global warming • Global average temperature rise by between 2 and 4 degree Celsius for the “doubling” case. • More droughts and floods. • Sea levels rise. • …. When? How much more? How credible …?

  7. Common sense questions How much total reduction of annual carbon emissions---fossil fuels usage---from our current value do we need? Over how many years can we spread out the total reduction job if we start right now? What penalty do we pay if we procrastinate? How do we monitor the state of the global warming world?

  8. A sample web link from “An Inconvenient Truth” Want to do something to help stop global warming? Here are things you can do … Use fluorescent lights Drive less Recycle more Check your tires Use less hot water …. http://www.climatecrissis.net/pdf/10things.pdf

  9. Messages from the media • Windmills off Cape Cod? No. • Nuclear energy? No. • Perhaps the global GDP might drop 1%. • Executive orders setting goals. Yes. • Fine the polluters. Yes. • Ethanol from corn. Yes. • We can stop global warming now if we only have the will. • …

  10. The punch lines (years)

  11. Best known stabilization curves(WRE, 1996)

  12. Meaning of Estab and L Analogy to a college in steady state: Estab is (allowed) size of freshmen class. L is student residence time. Cstab-600 is current enrollment on campus.

  13. Derivation of CPM(t) CPM is short for Constant Pace Mitigation Mitigation job is done in CPM(t) years. Value of CPM(t) does not depend on science at all.

  14. Where does science come in? The following comes from published science-based studies: Better science will provide better L(t;…). RepeatCPM(t) is independent of science.

  15. Answers to question A For simplicity, we use L(t)~200 years It is not a 10% or 20% problem! Cstab=1200, Estab=3 GtC/yr Cstab=1000, Estab=2 GtC/yr Cstab=900, Estab=1.5 GtC/yr Cstab=800, Estab=1 GtC/yr Currently, C~800 GtC, and E~8 GtC/yr

  16. Answers to question B Its value depends on the chosen target ceiling Cstab, and the current (observed) values of C(t) and dC(t)/dt. Right now, C(0)=800 GtC, dC(0)/dt=4 GtC/yr. So: Cstab=1200, CPM(0)=200 years, Cstab=1000, CPM(0)=100 years.

  17. Historical data of CPM(t)

  18. The CPM strategy The CPM strategy is a benchmark strategy which can serve as a guide line. The recommended pace of mitigation is denoted by PCPM, defined by: PCPM(t) and CPM(t) can be computed anytime.

  19. State of the global warming world CPM(t) tells how many years do we have (at most) to stabilized at the chosen Cstab. PCPM(t) tells how much annual emissions reduction is needed now to stabilized at the chosen Cstab for each of the next CPM(t) years (it is the lower bound of this value). When we are not doing what we should be doing, CPM(t) would drop by more than one year each year, and PCPM(t) would rise.

  20. Answers to question C Consequences of business-as-usual

  21. The Do-the-best-we-can scenario

  22. Carbon cycle emulator • Carbon that used to be buried underground is being dug up, pumped out, burned and emitted into the atmosphere. • Once in the atmosphere, it somehow migrates into the biosphere and the deep ocean, leaving some to stay on. • Conservation of carbon mass must be respected.

  23. The Three-tank Model Atmosphere Biosphere Deep Oceans

  24. The three-tank model This is a linear model, with four constants: S, L,  and . E(t) is the forcing function.

  25. In the fast S limit, it reduces to a two-tank model Historical initial condition: C=B=D=600 GtC when E=0.

  26. Comparison of the two-tank Model with HILDA E(t) extracted from HILDA run vs original E(t)

  27. Historical data of 1/(1+)taken when E was rising with time

  28. Fantasies A California bio-engineering team has cultivated a strain of termites that eats carbon based garbage, reproduces madly when exposed to sun light and water vapor, and dies happily as greasy oily balls which have the same chemical structure as crude oil from the Middle East. It can produce good quality crude oil at $20 per barrel. OPEC announces a price cut and vows to defend its market share.

  29. Conclusions Global warming is not a 10% or 20% problem. It is a more than 60% problem. No single technology is likely to be able to do the job. It needs the sum of all the 5% and 10% contributions it can get. Conservation helps. Fission nuclear should not be preemptively be discarded. CPM(t) for several interesting Cstab’s should be publicized annually to keep the public informed. Technology alone cannot solve the problem. The invisible hand of free market capitalism must be removed.

  30. Parting remarks • Political leaders (Gore, Blair, Schwarzenegger, Corzine, …) must recognize thathaving the will to do the job is not enough. • The general public (you, me, and our grandchildren, …) must be willing to pay the costs and bear the burdens of doing the job. • The global warming problem is much bigger than the ‘energy independence’ and the ‘air pollutions’ problems for which conservation must play a dominant role.

  31. Socolow, R. H. and Lam, S. H.Good enough tools for global warming policy making, in Energy for the Future, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 2007.Available at http://www.princeton.edu/~lam

  32. Historical data of d(CPM)/dt

  33. Plot of dC/dt vs E using solutions from the One-tank Model

  34. Plot of dC/dt vs E for “parabolic immediately” cases for several positive s

More Related