1 / 32

Rituximab is Approved After Failure with 1 anti-TNF a Inhibitor

Rheumatoid Arthritis: Expanding Treatment Options HIGHLIGHTS FROM EULAR 2008 PRESENTATIONS June 11-14, 2008 Paris, France. Is there a benefit to using Rituximab, instead of another TNF a -inhibitor, when a patient has already failed a TNF a -inhibitor?

ilana
Download Presentation

Rituximab is Approved After Failure with 1 anti-TNF a Inhibitor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rheumatoid Arthritis:Expanding Treatment Options HIGHLIGHTS FROMEULAR 2008 PRESENTATIONSJune 11-14, 2008Paris, France

  2. Is there a benefit to using Rituximab, instead of another TNFa-inhibitor, when a patient has already failed a TNFa-inhibitor? • What are long-term results of its use in the real World? • What are the options when Rituximab doesn’t work? • Can you use a TNFa-inhibitor with Rituximab? Rituximab is Approved After Failure with 1 anti-TNFa Inhibitor

  3. Switching to rituximab vs. alternative second or third TNF-inhibitor after treatment failure to first TNF-inhibitor • Rationale • About 30% of patients on anti-TNF agents do not respond to treatment and large numbers of responders eventually lose their response • When patients fail one anti-TNF agent, switching to another class of agent such as rituximab may be more effective than opting for a second or third TNF inhibitor Finckh et al. EULAR 2008, abstract OP-0249.

  4. Decreased effectiveness to a Second anti-TNF EULAR response rates 3 monthsafter anti-TNF initiation Adapted from Navarro et al. Arthritis Rheum 2006;54:abstract 873 (Spanish RA cohort)

  5. Switching to Rituximab vs. alternative second or third TNF-inhibitor after treatment failure to First TNF-inhibitor • Patients and treatment • 300 patients had failed at least one anti-TNF agent • 101 patients received a first cycle of rituximab • 199 an alternative anti-TNF agent • Primary outcome: • Evolution of DAS28 scores over the 1st year Finckh et al. EULAR 2008, abstract OP-0249.

  6. Initiate treatment with a biological agent with a different mechanism of action: Lasting change in DAS28 over 24 weeks with rituximab In RA patients with an inadequate response to anti-TNFs, the REFLEX trial has demonstrated that rituximab is more effective than placebo Weeks Mean change in DAS28 Adapted from Cohen et al. ArthritisRheum 2006; 54: 2793–806

  7. Results • Overall evolution of DAS28 was more favourable in the rituximab group than in the anti-TNF group (P=0.01) This study suggests that rituximab is more effective than switching to an alternative anti-TNF agent in patients who have persistent active disease despite anti-TNF therapy Finckh et al. EULAR 2008, abstract OP-0249.

  8. The STURE Registry(Stockholm TNFauppföljningsergister) • The STURE registry is a comprehensive registry in the larger Stockholm area of patients receiving biological therapies for RA • The registry described experience with rituximab in 114 of these patients • EULAR disease activity: 78% high, 19% moderate Baselinedemographics van Vollenhoven et al. EULAR 2008, abstract FRI0168.

  9. The STURE Registry: DAS28 Response P=0.002 P<0.001 van Vollenhoven et al. EULAR 2008, abstract FRI0168.

  10. The STURE Registry EULAR Response n=71 n=51 n=27 • At 3 months 64% of patients achieved a good/moderate response; 19% a good response and 14% a DAS28 <2.6 • At 6 months, 62% achieved a good/moderate response; 23% a good response and 18% a DAS28 <2.6 van Vollenhoven et al. EULAR 2008, abstract FRI0168.

  11. The STURE Registry Conclusions • After 9 months of follow-up, there was no difference in efficacy between patients treated with or without MTX • Efficacy appears similar in RF+ and RF– patients • Results in this registry were consistent with clinical trials • Rituximab is a useful therapy in patients with very active, TNF-refractory RA, with 60-70% having a EULAR response and 20-30% achieving low disease activity or remission van Vollenhoven et al. EULAR 2008, abstract FRI0168.

  12. A UK Single-centre Experience • Real-world” clinical experience with any drug does not always reflect that of clinical trials • It is important to understand if general use of rituximab offers patients similar efficacy and safety as reported in clinical trials • Investigators describe a single-centre experience in which the long-term effects of rituximab were documented for their first 100 patients • Characteristics for all patients: • DAS28 >5.1 • RF-positive or anti-CCP antibody • Inadequate response or contraindication to anti-TNF agents • Clinical outcome was determined at 6 months by EULAR criteria Dass et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0352

  13. Mean DAS 28 scores at 6 months improved with each cycle

  14. A UK Single-centre Experience • Mean DAS28 scores at 6 months improved with each cycle • Only 6 patients out of the 100 treated did not respond to Rituximab therapy (94% response rate) • All good responses were maintained after the second cycle and 18% of previously moderate responders improved further and achieved good responses • Initial non-response does not preclude response to further therapy Dass et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0352

  15. A UK Single-centre, Real-world Experience • Rituximab appears to be well tolerated, even in those patients with complex disease • 19% were on leflunomide instead of methotrexate, 6% were not on a DMARD • No differences in duration of response observed in any of these groups Dass et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0352

  16. A Real-world Experience in a Canadian Centre • Investigators reviewed the use of rituximab in severe RA patients refractory to DMARD and anti-TNF therapy • A total of 21 patients from a prospective longitudinal database in Calgary were included Hazlewood et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0362

  17. A Real-world experience in a Canadian Centre Assessment at 3 months Eight patients required a second course of rituximab after an average of 10.4 months, and one required a third course • 2 cases of serious infections and 4 of non-serious infections • Three infusion reactions occurred in 2 patients • Nonspecific reactions occurred in 3 patients Hazlewood et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0362

  18. A Real-world Experience in a Canadian Centre Conclusions • Rituximab is efficacious in the treatment of patients with severe RA who are intolerant or resistant to anti-TNF therapy • Results support evidence that depletion of B cells with rituximab is efficacious in RA • Adverse events did occur but none were fatal Hazlewood et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0362

  19. Optimizing response to retreatment with rituximab • It was previously reported that for every 1.0 point the DAS28 was allowed to worsen before a 2nd course of rituximab, patients had a 0.32 point higher DAS28 post-retreatment • Investigators explored whether the more clinically accessible Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) might also be predictive of retreatment outcome • Analysis was based on the REFLEX trial (Arthritis & Rheumatism 2006;54(9):2793-806) and subsequent open-label extension study Mease et al. EULAR 2008, abstract THU0188

  20. REFLEX Study design and open-label extension phase Open-labelExtension study Double-blind course 1 Screen/TNFand/or DMARD withdrawal period Randomization • • • • • • Rituximab + MTX (Group A)* Methotrexate (MTX) x ≥ 3 months Placebo + MTX (Group B)* Timing of course 2 was at physician discretion Screen Day1 Week2 Week4 Week8 Week12 Week16 Week20 Week24 Rituximab: 1000 mg or placebo iv infusionMethylprednisolone: 100 mg iv before rituximab infusionPrednisone: 60mg day 2-7, 30mg day 8-14 Rescue • Clinic visit Standard of care Primary efficacy time point Rituximab +MTX *Note: The group A and B ITT populations were 298 and 201, respectively. Mease et al. EULAR 2008, abstract THU0188

  21. SDAI and CDAI for Predicting Outcome of a Second Course of Rituximab for Patients with RAMean disease activity scores by time to course 2 intervals Mease et al. EULAR 2008, abstract THU0188

  22. Percentage change from baseline forA) SDAI, B) CDAI and C) DAS28 Mease et al. EULAR 2008, abstract THU0188

  23. SDAI and CDAI for Predicting Outcome of a Second Course of Rituximab for Patients with RA • Every 1.0 point that SDAI was allowed to worsen before C2 resulted in a 0.21 point higher SDAI score post-C2 • Every 1.0 point that CDAI was allowed to worsen before C2 resulted in a 0.24 point higher CDAI score post-C2 • These data suggest that outcome following a second course of rituximab is better the less that disease activity is allowed to worsen before repeating treatment • Retreatment before patients are allowed to flare results in improved disease activity after C2 rituximab Mease et al. EULAR 2008, abstract THU0188

  24. Early use of rituximab in patients with severe RA refractory to DMARDS Patient Characteristics 13 women and 2 men with severe RA and poor response to conventional therapy with multiple DMARDS, corticosteroids and NSAIDs. The average age was 52 years old with an average disease duration of 3 years. Marked extra-articular manifestations RF-positive at high titers DAS28 >5.6 HAQ = 1.4 No prior use of anti-TNF therapy Guzman et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0358

  25. Results and Conclusion 80% of improvement in clinical parameters was observed at an average of three weeks after initiation of treatment. Rituximab may be an excellent alternative as a first-line biological agent in patients with aggressive disease Guzman et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0358

  26. Rituximab ACR and DAS28 response after 24 weeks in RA patients with inadequate response to one TNFa inhibitor: The RESET trial An open-label, single-arm, multicentre, international study (26 sites in Canada, 9 in Sweden) of safety and efficacy of a combination of rituximab with methotrexate in patients with active RA with an inadequate response or intolerance to only one prior TNF-inhibitor Interim analysis in 50 patients with a follow-up of 24 weeks after 2 infusions of rituximab 1000 mg Mean DAS28 at baseline 6.4 ±1.2 Haraoui et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0360

  27. Results Haraoui et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0360

  28. Results • FACIT-F scores decreased by 34% by week 24 • EULAR good/moderate response at 4, 12, and 24 weeks were 54%, 74% and 78%, respectively • DAS remission was seen in 8% of patients and low disease activity in 20% by week 24 • Mean DDAS28 of -2.2 at Week 24 from a baseline of 6.4 ±1.2 Haraoui et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0360

  29. Conclusions • A single course of rituximab with MTX provided clinically significant improvements in disease activity by week 24 in patients with active, long-standing RA who had an inadequate response to one prior anti-TNF agent • Small improvements in HAQ are probably due to irreversible damage seen in a cohort with long-standing disease Haraoui et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0360

  30. Combination therapy with rituximab and etanercept for patients with RA • Six patients with long-standing refractory RA who failed rituximab were treated with etanercept two months after receiving rituximab • Over 6 months, DAS28 significantly decreased to 4.2 and high serum CRP levels of 68.9 mg/L prior to receiving the combination decreased to 7.4 mg/L • No severe infections occurred over a mean of 10.7 months and the frequency of mild bronchitis or influenza was not increased with the combination • Short-term results are promising but without long-term experience, the rituximab/etanercept combination cannot yet be recommended Blank et al. EULAR 2008, abstract THU0165.

  31. Safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients with chronic infection Casas et al. EULAR 2008, abstract AB0378 • Five patients with active chronic infections not eligible for anti-TNF therapy were treated with rituximab. • Mean treatment duration: 15.6 months • ACR20 at six months was 59% and 45% at 12 months. • Patients did not experience any adverse events or worsening of their chronic infection, suggesting that rituximab may be a safe and effective therapy in patients with chronic infections in whom anti-TNF therapy is contraindicated • Continuous courses of rituximab do not increase the frequency of severe infections and for patients with contraindications to anti-TNF agents, B-cell depletion may be an attractive alternative

  32. Summaryof Findings • Rituximab may more effective than switching to an alternative anti-TNF agent in patients with persistent active disease • Rituximab is a useful therapy in patients with very active, TNF-refractory RA and efficacy appears similar in RF+ and RF– patients • Duration of response with Rituximab is at least 6 months • Subsequent courses of Rituximab continue top provide added benefit • Rituximab appears to be well tolerated even by patients with complex disease • Continuous courses of rituximab do not increase the frequency of serious infections • Rituximab is an excellent alternative as a first-line biological agent in patients with aggressive disease

More Related