90 likes | 225 Views
Ensuring Rigour in our Accountability/M&E Processes 2014 PRAPs By Vincent Azumah Regional Coordinator, Monitoring & Evaluation. The structure of our M&E suggests all working towards a bigger and broader goal of one organisation -WANEP.
E N D
Ensuring Rigour in our Accountability/M&E Processes 2014 PRAPs By Vincent Azumah Regional Coordinator, Monitoring & Evaluation
The structure of our M&E suggests all working towards a bigger and broader goal of one organisation -WANEP
Bridging the gap between Activity Implementation and Results ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION Desired Results The Big Gap Monitoring Learning and Improvement Documentation of changes/results and lessons
Improving On Our Practice Observe Change and document RELIEF RESULTS Continuous Analysis Monitoring and documentation Critical PLANNING
The Complex Nature of Peacebuilding Identifying Change and documentation Activity Implementation Participatory activity planning REMEMBER CHANGES IN PEACEBUILDING WORK IS NOT LINEAR
NALPS REQUIREMENTS Continuous improvement and documentation Our Thematic Programmes Cycle of analysis of our actions, events and all processes Planned activities which respond to National and Regional Seeking change in complex peacebuilding programs demand analysis and drawing links between all processes
EXTERNALREVIEW MIDTERMREVIEWS NALPS and the Strategic Programme APPRAISAL STRATEGY ANNUAL REPORTING ANNUAL PLAN ANNUAL PRAPs MONTHLY/ACTIVITY, QUATERLY REVIEWS AND REPORTS STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION
Principles and Values + Core organizational Processes Our Principles and Values • Mutual respect • Transparency • Accountability • Gender equality • Teamwork • Diversity • Tolerance • Justice • Quality delivery • Dedication • Collaboration and consultation Core Processes and Tools • Strategic Plans with Monitoring Frameworks • Annual Plans and Budgets • Monthly, Quarterly Reviews • Strategic Reviews • Annual Participatory Review and Analysis Processes (PRAPs) • Annual Reports • Quarterly Reports • Activity Reports • Audits
Lack of Transparency lack of funds Weak Networks Self profiteering Accountable professional sustainability WANEP With what lenses are we entering the new era ofWANEP? Are we going to be crying for funds, weak, self profiteering national networks or Professional, Transparent and Accountable National Networks