1 / 30

Delivering for London Towards Smarter Engagement

Capital Ambition. Delivering for London Towards Smarter Engagement. Ken Cole 5 th October 2010. OEA / CRS Usage Participation Maps. London acting as London. Enfield. Barnet. Harrow. Redbridge. Haringey. Waltham Forest. Havering. Hackney. Brent. Islington. Camden.

ina-carey
Download Presentation

Delivering for London Towards Smarter Engagement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Capital Ambition Delivering for LondonTowards Smarter Engagement Ken Cole 5th October 2010

  2. OEA / CRS Usage Participation Maps London acting as London

  3. Enfield Barnet Harrow Redbridge Haringey Waltham Forest Havering Hackney Brent Islington Camden Barking& Dagenham Newham Tower Hamlets Ealing Hillingdon City Westminster Ken &Chels H’smith& Fulham Greenwich Southwark Hounslow Bexley Wandsworth Lambeth Richmond Lewisham Merton Kingston Bromley Sutton Croydon Online Expenditure Analysis (OEA) 2009-2010 Participation in 2009-10 Provision of data in 2008-9 Status at 22nd September2010 Did not participate in 2008-9 4 Participated in 2008-9 OEA 29 29 Data Received for 2009-10 OEA Not Participating in 2009-10 OEA 2 Confirmed Participation in 2009-10 OEA – data not received 2

  4. Enfield Barnet Haringey Harrow Waltham Forest Redbridge Havering Hackney Brent Islington Camden Barking & Dagenham Tower Hamlets Newham Hillingdon City Ealing Westminster Ken & Chels H’smith & Fulham Greenwich Southwark Hounslow Bexley Lambeth Wandsworth Richmond Lewisham Merton Kingston Bromley Croydon Sutton Contracts Register Service Participation September 2010 Number of User Accounts and Number of Contracts 6 0 57 Hammersmith & Fulham Kensington & Chelsea 158 8 19 78 12 12 57 14 19 16 28 15 39 17 74 19 18 21 78 35 56 4 4 9 3 8 6 5 9 4 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 265 662 205 130 154 176 137 353 109 275 267 155 368 572 151 178 151 181 210 145 109 275 564 456 96 31 34 57 99 46 58 2 Number of user accounts 158 0 205 Number of Contracts

  5. Supplier Commonality London acting as London

  6. West London Alliance

  7. East London Strategic Solutions

  8. North London Strategic Alliance

  9. South East London

  10. South London Partnership

  11. London Third Party Expenditure Mapping Exercise London acting as London

  12. Optimum Engagement Levels

  13. Supply Positioning Explained Risk Bottleneck ensure suppliese.g. specialist care provision, interpreters, specialist components/services Strategiccontract/supplier managemente.g. outsourcing, care provision, housing provision, waste management, works Routine minimum attentione.g. stationery, courier services, general maintenance supplies, printing, cleaning materials Leverage drive for savingse.g. IT, vehicles, utilities, advertising, temporary staff Value

  14. Supply Positioning Outcomes

  15. Four Level Supply Positioning National Regional Sub - Regional Local

  16. London Procurement Survey Outcomes and Views London acting as London

  17. Enfield Barnet Harrow Haringey Redbridge Waltham Forest Havering Hackney Brent Islington Camden Barking & Dagenham Newham Tower Hamlets Ealing Hillingdon City Westminster Ken & Chels H’smith & Fulham Greenwich Southwark Hounslow Bexley Wandsworth Lambeth Richmond Lewisham Merton Kingston Bromley Sutton Croydon Procurement Survey September 2010 Participation in Procurement Survey 23 Borough participating in survey Borough did not respond to survey 9 Borough declined to participate 1

  18. Enfield Barnet Harrow Haringey Redbridge Waltham Forest Havering Hackney Brent Islington Camden Barking & Dagenham Newham Tower Hamlets Ealing Hillingdon City Westminster Ken & Chels H’smith & Fulham Greenwich Southwark Hounslow Bexley Wandsworth Lambeth Richmond Lewisham Merton Kingston Bromley Sutton Croydon Procurement Survey September 2010 Size of Procurement Teams 1 - 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 - 20 Over 20

  19. Size of Procurement Teams

  20. Enfield Barnet Haringey Harrow Redbridge Waltham Forest Havering Hackney Brent Islington Camden Barking & Dagenham Newham Tower Hamlets Ealing Hillingdon City Westminster Ken & Chels H’smith & Fulham Greenwich Southwark Hounslow Bexley Wandsworth Lambeth Richmond Lewisham Merton Kingston Bromley Sutton Croydon Procurement Survey September 2010 Number of Specialist Category Managers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 3

  21. Authorities with Category Managers

  22. Enfield Barnet Waltham Forest Harrow Haringey Redbridge Havering Hackney Brent Islington Camden Barking & Dagenham Newham Tower Hamlets Ealing Hillingdon City Westminster Ken & Chels H’smith & Fulham Greenwich Southwark Hounslow Bexley Wandsworth Lambeth Richmond Lewisham Merton Kingston Bromley Sutton Croydon Procurement Survey September 2010 Savings Targets Established over 3-year Period (2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13) No Targets set over 3-year period Targets set for 1 or more years in the period Targets throughout the 3-year period

  23. Procurement Teams with Cashable Savings Targets

  24. Savings Targets by Financial Year

  25. Enfield Barnet Harrow Haringey Redbridge Waltham Forest Havering Hackney Brent Islington Camden Barking & Dagenham Newham Tower Hamlets Ealing Hillingdon City Westminster Ken & Chels H’smith & Fulham Greenwich Southwark Hounslow Bexley Wandsworth Lambeth Richmond Lewisham Merton Kingston Bromley Sutton Croydon Procurement Survey September 2010 Percentage of Third Party Spend Directly Influenced by Council Procurement Team < 10% 11% – 25% 26% - 50% 51% - 75% 26 Over 75%

  26. Influence on Annual Third Party Expenditure

  27. Effectiveness of Savings Techniques

  28. Structures for Savings Delivery

  29. Contact DetailsKen Cole 07721 556537 01784 8985040 ken.cole@sps-consultancy.co.uk

More Related