260 likes | 1.7k Views
Four Theories of the Press Siebert, Peterson and Schramm. Frederick S Siebert, Theodore Peterson and Wilbur Schramm, Four Theories of the Press. Urbana, University of Ilinois Press, 1963 (Originally published in 1956. The Theories . Authoritarian Libertarian Social Responsibility
E N D
Four Theories of the PressSiebert, Peterson and Schramm Frederick S Siebert, Theodore Peterson and Wilbur Schramm, Four Theories of the Press. Urbana, University of Ilinois Press, 1963 (Originally published in 1956
The Theories • Authoritarian • Libertarian • Social Responsibility • Soviet Communist
Authoritarian • Developed in the 16th and 17th centuries • Absolute power of the monarchy (truth) • Press supports monarchy • Press must be licensed • Can’t criticize monarchy
Libertarian • Began during the Enlightenment (Milton, Locke, Mills): Rationalism and Natural Rights Time of the Founding Fathers • Press informs, entertains and sells • Press helps discover the truth – the free marketplace of ideas Anyone can publish • Can’t defame or be obscene • Checks government
Soviet Communism • From Marx, Lenin and Stalin • Press contributes to success of the state • Only legal party members can publish • Government has “influence” over the press • Can’t criticize party
Social Responsibility • How our press is suppose to operate • Don’t have a free marketplace, so press must be responsible or forced to be • Everyone should have access to press (letters, opinions) • Controlled by community opinion, ethics • Can’t violate people’s rights • Press can be free and be combrehensive and objective
Hutchins Commission ’47 • Power of chains • Lack of social responsibility • Need for truthful, comprehensive, intelligent account of day’s events • Need to be a forum for comment, criticism • Need to be representative (minorities) • Need to challenge society’s goals and values
Goals of Social Responsibility • Journalism school needed to train reporters • Journalists need to be free from obligations and influence • Opinion pages • Local control of content (especially with chains) • Ombudsmen to be readers’ advocates