290 likes | 583 Views
PMT Calibration Results and the MC simulation. Shigeru Yoshida, Chiba University http://www.ppl.phys.chiba-u.jp/. Outline. Overview of the IceCube PMT calibration for the detector MC Absolute QE/CE Uniformity of CE Charge Resolution/WaveForm The Response Modeling
E N D
PMT Calibration Results and the MC simulation Shigeru Yoshida, Chiba University http://www.ppl.phys.chiba-u.jp/
Outline • Overview of the IceCube PMT calibration for the detector MC Absolute QE/CE Uniformity of CE Charge Resolution/WaveForm • The Response Modeling • A DOM-analog MC prototype
The DOM/PMT calibration Gain/Waveform (by S.Yoshida Mons2003) DOM 2D Scan (Scheduled this year) QE/CE + Uniformity (by H.Miyamoto Mons2003/this meeting)
The Absolute QE/CE measurement Monitoring N2 Scattering by The calibrated tubes Aperture Limiter Reflectors/Attenuators Energy Meter
Attachment for the IceCube PMT Calibration PMTs Chamber PMT Box Beam Rotation Bed N2 laser • Photon beam with 13 mm diameter scans the cathode
CE Uniformity2D scan PMT UV LED R-guide Rotation-bed Motor
Example: The relative Collection Efficiency SF0030 vs SF0050 SF0016 vs SF0050
Charge Resolution/Waveform In the Freezer Temp –32degree
PMT Setting in the Freezer Base circuit Diffuser attached to UV LED
The calibration data for the MC simulation • The absolute QE/CE data of 4 PMTs now under measurement • The CE uniformity data of 16 PMTs available • The SPE spectrum and the waveform @ -30C At HV from 1600V to 2000 V for 4 PMTs • The Gain uniformity data of 1 PMT (possible to add 3 more PMTs) We are ready to add more PMT data this summer in the pre-shipping measurement.
The Table data + Interpolation DOM 2D scan + Normalization By the absolute calibration GEANT4 QE/CE + Uniformity Empirical Table The DOM response Modeling Charge Response/Waveform
SPE Charge Response • Sspe(q)~ (1-Pe)exp[-q/qt] + Pe NG(q-q0/qs)
SPE Charge Response Cont’dSome GOOD News • qt/q0, qs/q0 universally scaling
SPE Charge Response Cont’dSome GOOD News • Global qt/q0, qs/q0can reconstruct the response of ALL PMTs at every gain
And some BAD News… • GAIN seems to have some position dependences….
We see it in the “CE” scan data CE XGain . • We may be able to ignore this because… • so smallin terms of AREA • Simulating MPEs response would be OK • ONLY SPEsimulation might be problematic
SPE Waveform Model • Gaussian fits well!!
SPE Waveform Model • FWHM of a SPE pulse depends on PMT gain. • But the change is small … 200 psec or so
Some Issues and Proposal • Uniformity exhibits significant tube to tube variance. We do not want to implement 4800 tables in the DOM MC. • SIMULATE the response for the broader light beam as a function of angle and compare it with the measurement at UW.
Some Issues and Proposal (Cont’d) • Localized gain variance has been found. • Use the AVERAGE behavior ?
Some Issues and Proposal (Cont’d) • Localized gain variance has been found. • Just ignore it!
DOM Analog MC prototype DOMVPmtWaveform.cc (1-Pe)exp[-q/qt] + Pe NG(q-q0/qs) DOMVPmtCharge.cc GEANT4 DOMVPmtQe.cc DOMVGlass.cc DOMVGel.cc
Summary • The PMT calibration data is ready for the detector MC • Modeling the PMT response was done. • A 1st prototype PMT MC module is being built under the root framework • Running this MC would address some concerns like the tube-tube variance • Please bookmark http://www.phys.chiba-u.jp/research/IceCube/PMT/