1 / 15

Social Observatory for Livelihoods Projects

Social Observatory for Livelihoods Projects. Vijayendra Rao, World Bank. Ghazala Mansuri and Vijayendra Rao. Induced vs Organic. Organic Participation by civic groups (organized or as part of movements) acting independently of government, and sometimes in opposition to it.

ishi
Download Presentation

Social Observatory for Livelihoods Projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Observatory for Livelihoods Projects Vijayendra Rao, World Bank

  2. Ghazala Mansuri and Vijayendra Rao

  3. Induced vs Organic Organic • Participation by civic groups (organized or as part of movements) acting independently of government, and sometimes in opposition to it. Induced (Focus of Report) • Participation induced by donors and/or governments via projects implemented at the local level.

  4. Lessons for Projects The variability of local context and the unpredictable nature of change-trajectories highlight the importance of developing effective systems of internal learning and monitoring. Such projects require constant adjustment, learning in the field, and experimentation in order to be effective. http://econ.worldbank.org/localizingdevelopment

  5. The Social Observatory • Core team of 12 from the World Bank • Key Partners • Bihar Rural Livelihoods Project • PudhuVaazhvu Project • Orissa Rural livelihoods Mission • Maharashtra State Rural Livelihoods Mission • Working with 15 academic and research partners • India: Delhi School of Economics, IGIDR, MIDS, Praxis • US: University of Arizona, Brown University, Cornell, Duke University, University of California- Berkeley • Also working with • North-East Rural Livelihoods Project • Rajasthan Rural Livelihoods Mission

  6. Key Principles • Information that is accurate • Relevant for Learning • Analysis that leads to improved action • Method Appropriate to the Need • Cultural Change: Learn from Real Data. From Failure and Success. • Imbedding the spirit of open debate and learning.

  7. Pillars • Monitoring • For real time learning by doing • 4 States • Impact Evaluations • For long term learning from periodic, scientifically designed evaluations • 12 ongoing, 8 planned in 4 states • Innovations and Special Studies • To understand key issues for project implementation and design • Capacity Building and Outreach • To develop state unit’s capacity to monitor, evaluate and conduct special studies

  8. Monitoring • DATA FOR ACTION (MIS + Analytical System) • Minimize time between data collection and entry • Indicators that are useful for project management • User friendly dashboards at every level of the project • Data validation via social audit, external audit and computerized validation • Working with four state projects to provide technical assistance

  9. Monitoring • Process Monitoring • Track key Implementation Processes • Rotating Sample • Reports that can be understood • Feedback loops • Community Based Monitoring • Data Validation and Accountability to SHGs • Integration with VO’s work • Integration with MIS

  10. Impact Evaluation: Core Intervention • Core evaluations- formation and mobilization of SHGs and Village Organizations • Four ongoing evaluations (Bihar – Baseline Completed, TN – Baseline Completed, Orissa – Baseline Completed, Rajasthan – Baseline Completed, Maharashtra – Initiated) • Rigorous Methodologies (RCT, RDD, PSM) • Questions examined include a focus on key project objectives • Partnering with several scholars

  11. Mixed-Method Approach to Evaluations Rigorous Quantitative Methods “Well-being” broadly defined: Consumption, Income (where possible), Subjective Welfare, Empowerment and Agency, psychic well-being. Careful, in-depth qualitative work to track mechanisms and processes of change

  12. Impact Evaluation: “Vertical” Interventions • Designed to test vertical interventions, and pilots • RCT Designs (Ongoing) • Four evaluations • Food Security (Bihar) (mid-term completed) • Nutrition (AP) • Community Managed Sustainable Agriculture (AP) • System of Crop Intensification (SRI/SCI) (Bihar) • Incentivizing local governments to work with SHGs (TN)

  13. Innovations and Special Studies • Innovations • Using innovative designs to estimate the impact of the interventions and its pathways • Bihar Behavioral experiments - Ongoing • In-depth Qualitative Study of Change - Ongoing • Bihar Rural Income Panel – Design Phase • Special Studies • Link with research partners and provide inputs into research design • Case-Study of NRLM’s Resource Block Strategy - Completed • Skills (TN, Bihar and MP) • Community monitoring (Bihar)

  14. Cross Cutting- An SO Initiative Building links with key policy makers in other sectors Outreach to Indian and international academic community Creating networks of excellence on monitoring and evaluation Plans to expand across the South Asia region

  15. Livelihoods – Phase 2 Create Sustainable Institutions Make day to day decisions and mid-course adjustments based on real, reliable, validated data. Think long term. Stop the boot polish.

More Related