160 likes | 271 Views
Security policy training course Sofia, Bulgaria. Dr Anne Deighton Geneva Centre for Security Policy and Oxford University. European security architecture: an overview Do institutions matter? What is the challenge of ‘ad hocery’.
E N D
Dr Anne Deighton Geneva Centre for Security Policy and Oxford University
European security architecture: an overview • Do institutions matter? • What is the challenge of ‘ad hocery’
Institutions, especially EU, NATO, OSCE, CoE. Essentially European in character, in a world of global and subregional institutions • States • Non-state actors • Ideas and values
The institutional web or architecture • Institutions are conservative: slow, path-dependent, predictable, rule-bound (whether they are international or state-based) • When they work, they deliver institutional security…
States and Institutions • States shape institutions, but are also shaped by institutions • How and why the size of the state matters: differences between eg NATO and the EU
Non-governmental organisations • Brussels the lobbying centre of Europe • Peak group influence • Charities
Ideas and values • Multi-lateralism • Assumptions • Value rules…joining the club
Institutions can compete and overlap…and are shaped by other institutions • Institutions can be hierarchical
Institutions can be functionally autonomous • Institutions can die or be shut down (WEU)
The challenge of ‘ad hocery’ • Within an institution: too many special exceptions to institutional rules
The challenge of ‘ad hocery’ • ‘the mission determines the coalition’ • Defection by states if institution fails to be attractive. Alternative poles of attraction
Significance for Bulgaria? • Institutions are shaping domestic policies • Condemned to succeed in a multilateral world
Significance for Bulgaria • Prioritising institutions • Playing the institutional game. Brussels - multi-dimensional chess. Languages. • Playing the state-partner game
Mutual control for mutual progress Institutional cooperation Supranational: functional/systemic Upgrading the common interest Integration: what for? • Hard headed politics with a fuzzy vision