CCCM Camp Coordination & Camp Management Global Cluster Update

1. CCCMCamp Coordination & Camp Management Global Cluster Update Shelter Meeting, Geneva 1 June 2007

2. Cluster Partners at Global Level Regular: • UNHCR and IOM (co-chairs) • CARE International • Danish Refugee Council (DRC) • International Rescue Committee (IRC) • Lutheran World Federation (LWF) • Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) • Shelter Centre • WFP • United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) • OCHA Occasional: • UNRWA, ICRC, IFRC, OHCHR, UNICEF

3. Cluster Partners at Field Level The partners involved in humanitarian response for IDPs hosted in camps or camp-like settlements are: • Main partners at global level • Governments/local authorities • Displaced persons through IDP camp leaders, representatives or camp committees • NGO service providers working in IDP camps • Other stakeholders – host communities, community based organisations (CBOs), donors.

4. Summary CCCM Presentation Shelter Meeting – November ‘06 • Global CCCM partners • CCCM framework: Roles and responsibilities – Camp Coordination/Camp Management and Camp Administration • CD ROM ‘IDP Key Resources’ • Training and Workshops • Deployment of staff to key IDP operations • CCCM – levels of intervention

5. What’s New since Shelter Meeting – November ’06? • CCCM – Standards and Policy-Setting • CCCM – Building Response Capacity • CCCM – Operational Support

6. 1. CCCM – Standards and Policy-Setting • IASC Gender Handbook – CCCM chapter • Needs Analysis Framework (NAF) – CCCM section • Study/Best practice: IDP collective centres • Best practice: camp coordination and camp management • Terms of References (ToR) for CCCM Cluster Lead • With WASH cluster: Mapping of roles and responsibilities of CCCM & WASH at field level • Available on: www.humanitarianreform.org

7. www.humanitarianreform.org

8. Study – IDP Collective Centres • Objectives: explain the phenomenon, assess the applicability of CCCM concepts to collective centres and propose ‘best practice’. • Key concepts and definitions • Different kinds of collective centres • Causes and consequences • Case studies – main findings • Elements of ‘best practice’ • ‘Guidance Note’ of best practices on camp management in collective centres

9. 2. CCCM – Building Response Capacity • CCCM Validation Workshop, Islamabad, Nov ’06: field personnel & global cluster partners • CCCM training for field personnel: • Panama City, Jan ‘07 • Cairo, Feb ‘07 • Amman (Iraq operation), Mar ‘07 • Uganda – Lira and Gulu, May ‘07 • Camp Coordination & Leadership Development Workshop, Cyprus, June ‘07

10. CCCM Responses in the Field • Liberia • Uganda • Pakistan • Philippines • Mozambique • Ethiopia • Madagascar • Darfur • Timor Leste • Chad • Somalia • DRC (up-coming)

11. 3. CCCM – Operational Support • Deployment of CCCM experts: • Somalia, Darfur, Philippines, Madagascar. • Deployment of Information Management experts: • Somalia, Myanmar, Uganda, Ethiopia • CartONG responsible for camp database & mapping of camps. • Deployment of IDP profiling expert: • Chad, Ivory Coast, Somalia • Support given to camp closure assessments in parts of Northern Uganda.

12. CCCM focus in 2007-08 • Develop joint needs assessment, monitoring and evaluation, standards and indicators for the cluster. • Update 2005 capacity mapping exercise. • Mainstream cross-cutting issues (HIV/AIDS, environment, gender etc) in CCCM activities. • Develop and disseminate 'best practice' on CCCM. • Strengthen CCCM training at national, regional and global levels. • Strengthen information management on protection/welfare situation and humanitarian services in camps. • Pilot protection incident software in camp environment. • Develop generic IT tool based on Uganda project.