1 / 22

Frederick Douglass, “ What to the Slave is the Fourth of July? ”

Frederick Douglass, “ What to the Slave is the Fourth of July? ”. Delivered July 5th, 1852 Corinthian Hall Rochester, New York. Rochester Ladies ’ Antislavery Society of Rochester 500-600 people, 12 1/2 cents each

jacob
Download Presentation

Frederick Douglass, “ What to the Slave is the Fourth of July? ”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Frederick Douglass, “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?”

  2. Delivered July 5th, 1852Corinthian HallRochester, New York • Rochester Ladies’ Antislavery Society of Rochester • 500-600 people, 12 1/2 cents each • FD letter to Gerrit Smith: 2-3 weeks of preparation (cf. opening: “no elaborate preparation”; “I have been able to throw my thoughts hastily and imperfectly together”) • Prayer; reading of the Declaration; speech; “universal burst of applause” John W. Blassingame, ed. The Frederick Douglass Papers. Series One. Speeches, Debates, and Interviews. Vol. 2. 1847-54. New Haven: Yale UP, 1982. 359-88.

  3. Circulation • Request for publication in pamphlet form • 700 “subscriptions” on the occasion • Published in Frederick Douglass’ Paper (formerly the North Star), 9 July 1852. Issue 29, col. D: “The Celebration at Corinthian Hall”

  4. The structure of the speech • Douglass’ headings • [Intro] • The Internal Slave Trade Internal Slavery • Religious Liberty • The Church Responsible • Religion in England and Religion in America • The Constitution • Three parts (Blight): “three essential rhetorical moves” • Setting patriotic Americans at ease • “Bitter critique” • Ending with hope

  5. Another way to think about structure:from Cicero, De Oratore (On the Ideal Orator, 1st century B.C.E.) • exordium – introduction; exhorts (calls to) people to attend to the speaker’s presence and themes • narratio – the story or historical context for the issue under discussion • confirmatio – the case being made: what is argued • refutatio – refuting counter arguments: what do people say against the position and how are they wrong • peroration – the “outside” of the oration: the conclusion

  6. Ethos, structure, irony Douglass refers to but inverts or treats ironically almost every structural element of the classical oration. • irony: incongruity or discordance between what is expected and the state of things • This inversion of expectations contributes to the central irony of his situation as speaker: “Why am I called upon to speak here to-day? What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national independence?” (¶30, 155; 367). • Irony rather than argument: “At a time like this, scorching irony, not convincing argument is needed” (¶38, 158; 371).

  7. Exordium (¶ 1-3): • Douglass: I won’t “grace my speech with any high sounding exordium” (148; 359-60). • Little learning • Modesty trope - a convention • Distance: “between this platform and the slave plantation, from which I escaped”

  8. Narratio: the story, historical context (¶4-28; 149-54; 362-66) • A story that does not need to be retold • How to think about time: • the celebration of the day • the childhood of the Republic of America - “Were the nation older, the patriot’s heart might be sadder, and the reformer’s brow heavier” • Geological time: analogy of the river (¶4) • A “simple story”;“as a people, Americans are remarkably familiar with all facts which make in their own favor: a national trait, a national weakness” (¶27)

  9. Narration as argument • “an unfashionable idea” (¶6): “here lies the merit” • “Resolved. . . “ (¶13) • An uncompleted project: “The 4th of July is the first great fact in your nation’s history--the very ring-bolt in the chain of your yet undeveloped destiny” (¶14). • “The Declaration of Independence is the Ring-Bolt to the chain of your nation’s destiny . . . Stand by those principles” (¶15) • “That bolt drawn, that chain broken, and all is lost” (¶16). The ship of state imperiled: crisis

  10. Ethos and irony: an oscillation between division and identification “The point from which I am compelled to view them . . .”- division “I will unite with you to honor their memory” (¶20) ---- “They were peace men . . .”(¶22): antithesis Laying the corner-stone of the national superstructure through syntax: “Fully appreciating . . .” (¶24)

  11. From monument to crisis (¶29-33) • “My business is with the present . . . the ever-living now”“Now is the time, the important time”“ You must live and must die, and you must do your work” (¶29, 154). • Washington’s monument built “by the price of human blood,” yet Washington “broke the chains” of his slaves. • “Why am I called upon to speak here to-day?” –a “sad sense of disparity between us” (¶32)

  12. Sharp reminders of distance/division • “This Fourth of July is yours, not mine” (156);“to drag a man in fetters into the grand illuminated temple of liberty . . . sere sacrilegious irony” (156) • Why I am called upon to speak? “By the rivers of Babylon . . .” (156) -- Psalms 137: 1-6: the captive forced to sing

  13. An ironic confirmatio: an argument which does not need to be argued • “My subject, then fellow-citizens, is AMERICAN SLAVERY. I shall see, this day, and its popular characteristics, from the slave’s point of view.” (156; 368) • “America is false to the past . . . present . . . and future” (¶32; 156). • “But I fancy I hear some one of my audience say . . . argue more, denounce less; persuade more, rebuke less . . .” (157) • “Where all is plain there is nothing to be argued.”

  14. What does not need to be argued: • 1. The slave is a man: legal evidence (¶335) “We” are ploughing, planting and reaping, using all kinds of mechanical tools . . . Douglass’s identification (1st person plural) with “the negro race”; the rhetoric of the list (157; 370) • 2. The slave owns his/her body -- “natural right to freedom” does not need the devices of argument (158): “There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven, that does not know that slavery is wrong for him” (158).

  15. Confirmatio continued • 1. Internal slave trade “Behold” - enargeia: bringing vividly before the eyes; human as animal (horse, sheep, swine) Douglass’ narrative: Why here? How different from the autobiography? (160; 373) • 2. Fugitive Slave Law (162); “religious liberty” - the fusion of religious and civic identities The law as a “declaration of war”: religion as “an empty ceremony, and not a vital principle requiring active benevolence, justice, love and good will towards man” (163).

  16. Confirmation continued • 3. The church as bulwark of slavery: criticism of Northern ministers who teach that “we ought to obey man’s law before the law of God” (165). • 4. “National inconsistency”: comparing national religious practices • 5. Constitution as “glorious liberation document” (168)

  17. Constitution • Garrison’s position: abolitionists should not vote because America’s government was pro-slavery; rejection of a corrupt political process; freedom in the north for blacks did not grant voting rights • Douglass, 1851: refusing to pursue the vote is acquiescing in discrimination; joined the Liberty and Free Soil parties to get emancipation before major political leaders; the oppressed should participate in the political process

  18. Peroration (¶63-64; 169-71) • He still has hope for the country: drawing encouragement from the Declaration of Independence in the context of internationalism • “walled cities and empires have become unfashionable” (170) • Ethiopianism -- an Africanist African-American philosophy • Garrisonian sentiments: bonds across division within abolitionist movement

  19. Declarations in Dialogue • A text becomes an intertext: circulation, imitation, warrant: the monumental becomes a flow • Republic of letters: public and private spheres, counterpublics (social movements; advocacy) • The redefinition of the human: who will count as “man”

  20. 21st-century publics: new genres, new media

  21. Rhetoric is your friend Rhetorical questions will help you as a writer in any context: Who speaks? To whom? In what situation? In what genre(s)? For what purpose? In what styles?

More Related