430 likes | 558 Views
Sustainable Hyderabad Project: Implementing cooperative and technical solutions to increase energy efficiency in irrigation. Technical Evaluation and Analysis of Energy Conservation, System Improvement and GHG Emissions Reduction from Capacitor Installation on Agricultural Pumpset Motors.
E N D
Sustainable Hyderabad Project: Implementing cooperative and technical solutions to increase energy efficiency in irrigation Technical Evaluation and Analysis of Energy Conservation, System Improvement and GHG Emissions Reduction from Capacitor Installation on Agricultural Pumpset Motors February 2013
Project Scope • DISCOM – Co-Operative Electric Supply Society (CESS) • No. of Sub station – 2 • Vattemula Sub-station 33/11 KV • Sanugula Sub-Station 33/11 KV • No. of Feeder – 4 • Namiligondapally Feeder 11 KV • Vattemula Feeder 11KV • Sanugula Feeder 11 KV • Lingampet Feeder 11 KV • Selected feeder for capacitors installation: • Namiligondapally Feeder 11 KV • Sanugula Feeder 11 KV • Total no. of DTR under Namiligondapally & Sanugula feeder: • 100 KVA – 35 No. • 63 KVA – 7 No. • Total Capacity of DTRs – 3941 KVA • No. of Villages – 5 • Namiligondapally • Vattemula • Kothapet • Sanugula • Ramaraopali cBalance Solutions Hub
Project Scope • Total No. of Pumps – 809 • Total Capacity of all pumps – 3028 HP • Pump Type Classifications: cBalance Solutions Hub
Study Scope • DISCOM – Co-Operative Electric Supply Society (CESS) • Sub station- Vattemula Sub-station 33/11 KV • Feeder – Namiligondapally Feeder 11 KV • Total no. of DTR under Namiligondapally feeder: • 100 KVA – 13 No. • 63 KVA – 3 No. • Total capacity of DTRs – 1489 KVA • Total area covered – 10.07 Kms • Total No. of Pumps – 325 • Total Capacity of all pumps – 1176.5HP • Pump Type Classifications: cBalance Solutions Hub
DTR Selection Methodology • Ideal DTR defined as DTR with 33% distribution across categories A, B, C • Deviation from ideal distribution calculated for each DTR: • = (% of Category A Pumps – 33%) + (% of Category B Pumps – 33%) + (% of Category C Pumps – 33%) • DTRs with lowest ‘sum of differences’ and mix of overloaded / non-overloaded DTRs selected for study cBalance Solutions Hub
Evaluation Methodology Sequential Capacitor Addition - Sampling Plan Table cBalance Solutions Hub
Challenges to Ideal Selection & Evaluation Methodlogy cBalance Solutions Hub
Scenario 1: Successive connectivity of capacitors P1 P2 P3 P4 C1 C2 C3 C4 P5 P6 P7 P8 C5 C6 C7 C8 DTR P9 P10 P11 P12 C9 C10 C11 C12 P13 P14 P15 P16 C13 C14 C15 C16 P17 P18 P19 P20 C17 C18 C19 C20
Scenario 2: Successive connectivity of capacitors but random turning off of pumps. P3 P4 P1 P2 C3 C1 C2 C4 P5 P8 P7 P6 C5 C8 C7 C6 DTR P9 P12 P10 P11 C9 C12 C10 C11 P14 P16 P15 P13 C14 C16 C15 C13 P17 P18 P19 P20 C17 C18 C19 C20
Scenario 3: Connection/Disconnection of capacitors at a time P1 P3 P2 P4 C1 C3 C2 C4 P5 P6 P7 P8 C5 C6 C7 C8 DTR P9 P12 P10 P11 C9 C12 C10 C11 P14 P16 P15 P13 C14 C16 C15 C13 P17 P18 P19 P20 C17 C18 C19 C20
Evaluation Scope • Selected DTRs for study : • KTP I – 100 KVA • VTM IX – 100 KVA • NGP II – 100 KVA • NGP III – 100 KVA • No. of Pumps connected with selected DTRs – 122 • Total capacity of pumps connected with selected DTRs – 450 HP • No. of Villages covered - 3 • Namiligundipalli • Vattemula • Kothapet cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: VTM - IX cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: VTM - IX cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 1: VTM - IX cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2 : NGP- 3 cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: NGP - 3 cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: NGP - 3 cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: NGP - 3 cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: NGP - 3 cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: KTP - I cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: VTM - IX cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: NGP - II cBalance Solutions Hub
Results Method 2: NGP - III cBalance Solutions Hub
Value Additions – Reduce Costs, Reduce Risks ENERGY Conservation cBalance Solutions Hub
Value Additions - Reduce Costs, Reduce Risks POTENTIAL Conservation Case Scenario: - I2R Losses reduction and reduced kVA generation by utility - 3028 hp connected load per feeder - PF improvement from 0.8 to 0.9 - kVA/kW reduction of 9.4% - I/kW reduction of 7.7 % - 3.5 km distance of pump from Feeder - 34 mm2 dia. aluminum conductor - Andhra Pradesh Grid Electricity GHG EF = 0.91 kg CO2e/kWh - 910 hrs. operation per year (5 hrs/day, for 6 months) cBalance Solutions Hub
Value Additions - Reduce Costs, Reduce Risks POTENTIAL cBalance Solutions Hub