1 / 15

The Energy Productivity Opportunity

The Energy Productivity Opportunity. Jason Blumberg McKinsey & Company. April 9, 2008. Global energy demand growth will accelerate to 2020 There are large, economic opportunities to curb demand growth through higher energy productivity. 57.

jake
Download Presentation

The Energy Productivity Opportunity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Energy Productivity Opportunity Jason BlumbergMcKinsey & Company April 9, 2008

  2. Global energy demand growth will accelerate to 2020 • There are large, economic opportunities to curb demand growth through higher energy productivity

  3. 57 GLOBAL END-USE ENERGY DEMAND MAP:US AND CHINA ARE THE LARGEST ENERGY USERS End-use energy demand by sector Percent; QBTUs • 100% = • 422 • 82 • 86 • 20 • 60 • 7 • Transportation • 18 • 20 • 21 • 28 • 36 • Residential • and • commercial • 35 • 33 • 35 • 37 • 57 • Industry • 47 • 46 • 45 • 35 • Global • U.S. • Europe • Middle East • China

  4. 180 GLOBAL ENERGY DEMAND GROWTH WILL ACCELERATE TO 2.2 PERCENT ANNUALLY TO 2020 • 2003-2020 • CAGR • % • 2.2 • 613 • Up from 1.7% 1986-2003 • 17 • 3.6 • QBTU • 63 • 2.2 • 95 • 2.2 • 422 • Air transport • 9 • 43 • Commercial • 2.4 • 158 • 66 • Road transport • 11 • Residential • 1.9 • 29 • 106 • Pulp and paper • 3.1 • 60 • 8 • 17 • Steel • 3.1 • 36 • Chemicals • 1.6 • 180 • 137 • Other industrial • 2003 • 2020 Source: MGI Global Energy Demand Model

  5. 64 DEVELOPING REGIONS, PARTICULARLY CHINA AND THE MIDDLE EAST, WILL DRIVE 85% OF GROWTH TO 2020 Regions End-use energy demand growth by region, 2003-20 QBTUs • Developed • Developing • 191 • 21 • 29 • 2 • 2 • 7 • 8 • 15 • 15 • 17 • 18 • 162 • 22 • China • Middle East • U.S. • Other Europe* • Other Asia** • Latin • America • India • North-western Europe • Canada • Japan • ROW • Total * Includes Baltic/Eastern and Mediterranean Europe and North Africa. ** Includes Australia and Korea. *** Includes South America and Mexico. Source: MGI Global Energy Demand Model

  6. 27 GDP GROWTH, NOT OIL PRICE, MAIN SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY • Scenarios • GDP* • Energy productivity*** • Oil price** • 720 • 670 • 2020 base case demand = 613 QBTU • 613 • 606 • 565 • Global demand growth to 2020 • Percent • 480 • High • 2.8 • 2.2 • 3.2 • Low • 1.7 • 2.1 • 0.7 *  2% for China and India,  1% for other developing regions, and  0.5% for developed economies ** 30, 50, 70 $/bbl crude oil respectively Source: BP; MGI Global Energy Demand Model

  7. 27 GDP GROWTH, NOT OIL PRICE, MAIN SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY – BUT ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY MATTERS MOST • Energy productivity*** • Scenarios • GDP* • Oil price** • 720 • 670 • 2020 base case demand = 613 QBTU • 613 • 606 • 565 • Global demand growth to 2020 • Percent • 480 • High • 2.8 • 2.2 • 3.2 • Low • 1.7 • 2.1 • 0.7 *  2% for China and India,  1% for other developing regions, and  0.5% for developed economies ** 30, 50, 70 $/bbl crude oil respectively *** 107 QBTU of additional demand in a “frozen technology” case without energy productivity improvements Source: BP; MGI Global Energy Demand Model

  8. Global energy demand growth will accelerate to 2020 • There are large, economic opportunities to curb demand growth through higher energy productivity

  9. 25 LARGE OPPORTUNITIES FOR GLOBAL ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS ACROSS SECTORS • Potential demand reduction in 2020 through enhanced energy productivity • QBTU • Percent of total opportunity • 2020 base • demand • 613 • 23 • Residential • 32 • 10 • Commercial • 13 • Transportation • 13 • 10 Industrial • 38 • 42-61 • 19 • Transformation • 25 • Capturing 135 QBTU would cut global energy demand growth from 2.2.% to 0.7% p.a. • 2020 • 478 Source: McKinsey Global Institute

  10. 327 WITHOUT A CHANGE, THE US WILL TO CONTINUE TO HAVE THE LOWEST ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY AMONG DEVELOPED REGIONS • Energy productivity • Billion real $ GDP /QBTU • 2003 • 2020 • Japan • North-Western Europe • United • States • China • Middle East • Global • Energyper capita • Million BTU /capita • Japan • North-Western Europe • United • States • China • Middle East • Global Source: MGI Global Energy Demand Model

  11. 0.6 …. AND THE US WILL SEE THE LOWEST ENERGY EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS ACROSS ALL SECTORS • Annual improvement of energy-efficiency indicators, 2003-2020 • SectorIndicator • ResidentialEnergy efficiency • CommercialEnergy efficiency • RoadFuel economy • SteelEnergy efficiency • 0.2 • 0.4 • 0.5 • 0.2 • U.S. • Europe • 1.0 • 0.6 • 0.8 • 0.3 • Japan • 1.5 • 0.4 • 0.8 • 0.3 • China • 2.0 • 1.5 • 0.7 • 0.6 Source: EIA, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab China Energy Group, MGI analysis

  12. 27.3 PURSUING THE ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY OPPORTUNITY WOULD ALSO HAVE A BIG IMPACT ON CO2 EMISSIONS Potential CO2 emission reduction in 2020 through enhanced energy productivity Metric tons (billions) • Percent of total opportunity • 2020 base demand • 35.3 • 21 • Residential • 1.7 • 9 • Commercial • 0.7 • 11 • Transportation • 0.9 • 40 • 40 • Industrial • 3.2 • 19 • Transformation • 1.5 • 2020 • 27.3 • Capturing the energy productivity opportunity would cut global CO2 emissions from 2.4% to 0.8% p.a.

  13. 50 • 0 • 5 • 10 • 15 • 20 • 25 • 30 • 35 • -50 • -100 • -150 • Marginal cost • Euros per tCO2e • 25-35 • 35-40 • 550 ppm • 450 ppm ENERGY DEMAND EFFICIENCY CAN BE AN ECONOMICALLY ATTRACTIVE WAY TO REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS • Global cost of abatement to 2030 • Euros per tCO2e • Abatement potential • GtCO2e per year

  14. THE ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY OPPORTUNITY • US energy productivity today lags other developed regions • As a result, US industrial companies have a disadvantage in high energy price environment – a gap that will grow if GHG emission costs are introduced • Large potential to reduce energy costs through positive return energy efficiency investments… • … and for innovative companies to grow by creating new solutions and markets • If captured, a win-win for the economy (business and individuals) and the environment

  15. Costs and Potential of Greenhouse Gas Abatement in Germany • Carbon Abatement Cost Curves For • Feb 2007 • Sep 2007 SELECT RELEVANT PUBLISHED MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE • Abatement and Regulation • How companies think about climate change: A McKinsey global survey • Mar 2008 • Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: How Much at What Cost? • Nov 2007 • A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction • Feb 2007 • European Commission Directorate General for Environment: Report on International Competitiveness • Dec 2006 • European Commission Directorate General for Environment: Review of EU Emissions Trading Scheme • Nov 2005 • Energy Efficiency • The case for investing in energy productivity • Feb 2008 • Leapfrogging to Higher Energy Productivity in China • July 2007 • Wasted Energy: How the U.S. Can Reach Its Energy Productivity Potential • July 2007 • Curbing Global Energy Demand Growth: The Energy Productivity Opportunity • May 2007 • Meeting China's energy needs through liberalization • July 2006 • Growth Markets • The New Power Brokers: How Oil, Asia, Hedge Funds, and Private Equity Are Shaping Global Capital Markets • Sept 2007 • Betting on Biofuels • May 2007 • Global trends in energy • Mar 2007 • Positioning Brazil for biofuels success • Mar 2007 • Making the most of the world's energy resources • Jan 2007 • The Biofuel (Re-)Evolution • 2007 • Productivity of growing global energy demand: A micro-economic perspective • Nov 2006 • Smarter investing in energy commodities • Aug 2006 • Sustainability • July 2007 • Shaping the new rules of competition • May 2007 • Investing in sustainability: An interview with Al Gore and David Blood • May 2007 • Exploring Business's Social Contract: An Interview with Daniel Yankelovich • Mar 2007 • Business Value and the Socio-Political Environment - The 5-R Framework • 2007 • A new era for business Source: McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey Quarterly, McKinsey Climate Change SI

More Related