1 / 8

January 2012

ECOBILAN Life Cycle Analysis of Fish Boxes in three materials across three EU countries Jan 2012 - Executive Summary. January 2012. Executive Summary – The background to the study.

jam
Download Presentation

January 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ECOBILAN Life Cycle Analysis of Fish Boxes in three materials across three EU countries Jan 2012 - Executive Summary January 2012

  2. Executive Summary – The background to the study • The aim of this independently-assessed life cycle analysis was to obtain reliable and up-to-date information on the environmental performance of EPS packaging for fresh fish and seafood products compared with other materials being offered. • The analysis is based on the comparison of three packaging solutions - EPS (Expanded Polystyrene) boxes, corrugated cardboard boxes and polypropylene boxes) and to ensure relevance to actual market circumstances across Europe, the study used real market scenarios using actual operating conditions from Spain, France and Scandinavia.

  3. Executive Summary – Overall Conclusions This study used expert knowledge and data from a number of sources including input from ANAPE, EcoPSE, EUMEPS, several industry partners and the leading international consultancy Price Waterhouse Coopers Consulting. It has revealed important conclusions. EPS is a highly competitive and provably sustainable packaging material for fresh fish with demonstrably better (or at the least comparable) LCA performance results across most of the environmental indicators used in the markets tested. The LCA also shows that the excellent performance of EPS has even further potential for improvement through reduced energy usage in manufacture and better recycling options in the future.

  4. Executive Summary – Objectives and Methodology • Key Objective: • Assessment of the true environmental impacts of EPS packaging. • Methodology / Data collection: • “Cradle-to-grave” Study, reflecting the full life cycle of each packaging system • Comparative study for three alternative fish box solutions • Expanded Polystyrene • Corrugated Polypropylene • Waterproofed Cardboard • Reference Scenarios for Spain, France, Scandinavia • 4 kg fresh fish from local harbour in France to local fish market • 6 kg fresh fish from local harbour in Spain to local fish market • 20 kg fresh fish from local fisheries in Denmark to international fish market

  5. Executive Summary – Key Data Remarks: Where performance is within 20% of the EPS value, the two are considered equivalent. Where performance is better than EPS by more than 20%, it is highlighted in green. Where performance is worse than EPS by more than 20% it is highlighted in red

  6. Executive Summary – EPS performance by market scenario • On the French market of the 8 environmental indicators, EPS performed better than cardboard in 4 and was at least comparable in 3. EPS also performed better than Polypropylene in 2 indicators and was at least comparable in 5 • For Spanish Market of the 8 environmental indicators, EPS performed better than cardboard in 5 and was at least comparable in 2. EPS also performed better than Polypropylene in 3 indicators and was at least comparable in 3 • For the Scandinavian market of the 8 environmental indicators, EPS performed better than cardboard in 3 and was at least comparable in 1. EPS also performed better than Polypropylene in 1 indicator and was at least comparable in 6 7/8 7/8 7/8 6/8 4/8 7/8

  7. Executive Summary – Further significant potential for EPS • The LCA indicates that two main stages of the life cycle of fish boxes have the greatest impact upon the environment: • Production of raw material • Production of finished packaging • By continuing its energy reduction efforts, the EPS industry has the potential to further improve its advantages over other materials. • An optimised end of life recycling effort would also offer the potential for further LCA advantages.

  8. Edited and summarised from the original EuMEPS study by the EPS Group of the British Plastics Federation

More Related