1 / 12

The Dedza Safety Nets Pilot Project (DSNPP) Objectives and methodology

The Dedza Safety Nets Pilot Project (DSNPP) Objectives and methodology. Carlos Barahona Statistical Services Centre The University of Reading. DSNPP. Pilot of direct welfare transfers (DWT) to the work-constrained rural poor Run by Concern Universal in Dedza

jamalia-langley
Download Presentation

The Dedza Safety Nets Pilot Project (DSNPP) Objectives and methodology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Dedza Safety Nets Pilot Project (DSNPP)Objectives and methodology Carlos Barahona Statistical Services Centre The University of Reading

  2. DSNPP • Pilot of direct welfare transfers (DWT) to the work-constrained rural poor • Run by Concern Universal in Dedza • M&E support from Calibre Consultants and the SSC at the University of Reading • Lessons will inform the design of a scaled-up DWT programme

  3. Objectives of the pilot The pilot aims to test and monitor: • Community management structures and transfer mechanisms • Whether the benefits reach the beneficiaries • The impact of the transfers on the well-being of beneficiaries • Logistics and cost • Consumer demand and the retail sector

  4. The process of the Dedza Safety Nets Pilot Project

  5. M&E tools • Impact on beneficiaries • Baseline and final impact surveys • Quarterly monitoring surveys • Process as managed by village committees • Minutes of committee meetings • Records of receipt of transfers by beneficiaries • Expenditure pattern • Receipts from vouchers • Surveys • Logistics and costs • CU officers’ records • CU accounts

  6. The transfers Three types, all of equal value = MK 550/month • Cash • Vouchers • In-kind • A pack of goods in September 2001 that comprised: 2 blankets, 6 plates, 1 metal cooking pot, 1 pail, 10 tablets of washing soap and 10 tablets of bathing soap. • Oct - Dec 2001: 20 kg of maize flour • Jan - May 2002: 15 kg of maize flour

  7. The voucher

  8. The village committees • Three types: • Democratically elected • Village head • Beneficiary/carer

  9. Monitoring intensity • Two intensities: • Closely monitored • Hands-off

  10. Closely monitored Closely monitored Closely monitored Village Head Village Head Village Head Hands-off Hands-off Hands-off Closely monitored Closely monitored Closely monitored Democratic Democratic Democratic In-kind Cash Vouchers Hands-off Hands-off Hands-off Closely monitored Closely monitored Closely monitored Beneficiaries Beneficiaries Beneficiaries Hands-off Hands-off Hands-off The resulting interventions 18 different interventions 3 villages with each type 54 villages

  11. Sampling and design • 386 villages in Linthipe and Kabwazi • 54 villages selected at random for the study • This design allows us to assess: • Differences between different types of transfer, types of committee, levels of monitoring • Any interactions between factors

More Related