300 likes | 493 Views
The challenges and opportunities of post-disaster waste management. Charlotte Brown charlotte.brown@canterbury.ac.nz (until 30 November 2012) lottiebrown@gmail.com. presentation outline. background e xisting plans and guidelines waste characteristics o perational strategies
E N D
The challenges and opportunities of post-disaster waste management Charlotte Brown charlotte.brown@canterbury.ac.nz (until 30 November 2012) lottiebrown@gmail.com
presentation outline • background • existing plans and guidelines • waste characteristics • operational strategies • management considerations
background disaster waste management
background 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami Photo credit: Erica Seville, University of Canterbury
2005 Hurricane Katrina background Photo credit: Tim Townsend, University of Florida
2009 Victorian Bushfires background
background 2010/2011 Christchurch earthquakes
social impact Why is good disaster waste management important? economic impact environmental impact background
existing plans and guidelines 2008 USEPA Planning for Natural Disaster Debris http://www.epa.gov/wastes/conserve/imr/cdm/pubs/pndd.pdf
existing plans and guidelines 2011 UNOCHA Disaster waste management guidelines www.ochanet.unocha.org/p/Documents/DWMG.pdf
existing plans and guidelines • current planning focusses on operational aspects. • it is challenging to plan for a very wide spectrum of disaster impacts. • a possible approach is to use disaster waste ‘indicators’ (see Brown, 2012 thesis, for more detail) • disaster scale • number of displaced persons • geographical extent of damage • duration of hazard event • damage to road network • volume of waste • human & environmental health hazards • movement of the waste (from point of origin), and • difficulty in handling the waste.
waste characteristics - composition typical types of waste • vegetative • construction and demolition • personal property / household items • household hazardous wastes • white goods • soil, mud and sand • vehicles and vessels • putrescent
how much waste? • varies widely between different disaster types and built environments. • FEMA have developed some waste estimation tools (FEMA, 2010, Debris Estimating Field Guide and FEMA, 2009, Multihazard loss estimation methodologies). • UNEP are currently developing some debris estimating tools. • some models have also been developed in Japan. waste characteristics - quantity
waste characteristics- hazards Photo credit: Tim Townsend, University of Florida
operational strategies - collection Hurricane Katrina kerbside collection http://www.ees.ufl.edu/homepp/townsend/disaster/DD_Overview.pdf Photo credit: Tim Townsend, University of Florida
operational strategies - collection 2009 Samoan tsunami clean-up
operational strategies – handling Temporary storage in rice paddies and mangroves, following the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami
operational strategies – handling Space needed: 50ha per 1,000,000 cu.m debris 2007 FEMA Debris Management Guide
operational strategies – treatmentreuse / recyclingwaste to energy incineration
operational strategies – final disposal Lyttelton Port Reclamation Christchurch, 2011
management considerations • overall management and coordination: link with recovery authority • human resources: skilled and unskilled work, livelihood and capacity building opportunities • public participation • public communication • human health and environmental risk management: accept there will be higher risks • laws and regulation: flexible and bounded • funding – public vs private
disaster waste has a significant impact on a community's social, economic and environmental recovery. • flexible planning is needed. • both operational and management aspects need to be considered. summary
key references • UNOCHA, 2011. Disaster Waste Management Guidelines, January 2011, Emergency Preparedness Section, Joint UNEP/OCHA Environment Unit. • USEPA, 2008. Planning for Natural Disaster Debris EPA530-K-08-001, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Office of Solid Waste, USEPA. • Brown, C., 2012. Disaster Waste Management: a systems approach. PhD thesis. University of Canterbury. (in particular, Appendix N)http://ipac.canterbury.ac.nz/ipac20/ipac.jsp?index=BIB&term=1793295#focus • Brown, C., Milke, M. & Seville, E., 2011. Disaster Waste Management: a Review Article. Waste Management, 31, 1085-1098.
charlotte.brown@canterbury.ac.nz thank you and questions?