1.15k likes | 1.16k Views
Welcome. First National Stroke Audit Meeting RCP(Ed) 17th Dec 02. Agenda. Who is here and who isn’t? Background relationship to national strategy purpose Examples of output which will be available Overview of National Audit of Stroke How to run the system locally Tea/coffee
E N D
Welcome First National Stroke Audit Meeting RCP(Ed) 17th Dec 02
Agenda • Who is here and who isn’t? • Background • relationship to national strategy • purpose • Examples of output which will be available • Overview of National Audit of Stroke • How to run the system locally • Tea/coffee • Live demonstration of software system • Questions • Future Plans
Establishing a National Audit of Stroke in Scotland Joint project: Intercollegiate committee on audit & standards Scottish Stroke Collaboration Information & Statistics Division funded so far by CHSS & RCP (Edin) now by the Scottish Executive
Who’s Here • Members of the steering group • MSD • Gordon Lowe - SIGN & RCPE • David Stott - Intercollegiate Standards Committee • Campbell Chalmers - CHSS • Beatrice Cant - CRAG/CEPS • Apologies from Rod Muir - ISD
Who’s Here • Audit & IT co-ordinators • Robin Flaig & Mike McDowall • Lead clinicians & other staff from interested hospitals • Information & Statistics Division (ISD) • Graham Mitchell • Marian Bain (Public health) • Diana Beard (STAG) • Clinical effectiveness fellow - Christine Meek
National Sentinel Audit(England, Wales & N Ireland) • Co-ordinated by RCP (Lond) • Organisation, min dataset, case note review • Uses modified, extended and tested version of RCP stroke Audit Package • Inter-rater reliability tested • Completed for 40 consecutive patients in most Trusts • 6894 cases in first round • third round now completed
Auditing process - coping with casemixNational Sentinel Audit of Stroke 1999
Auditing process - SwallowingNational Sentinel Audit of Stroke 1999
Problems of Sentinel Audits • Only 40 sets of case notes per Trust - therefore imprecise • Little control over sampling - therefore potentially biased • Data extraction not resourced • No independent data extraction - therefore potentially biased
Proportions of patients dying within 30 days after emergency admission with stroke
Problem of Stroke Outcome Indicators • Diagnostic inaccuracies • Lack of confidence in data • Insufficient data on outcomes • Virtually no data on process • Inadequate casemix adjustment
6 month Case Fatality Rate Crude Adjusted
Death or dependency at 6 month Crude Adjusted
Clinical Standards Board (CSBS) Produce standards SIGN Reviews Evidence Guidelines National Audit Monitors performance Managed Clinical Networks (MCNs) Improve performance Overall Plan
Clinical Standards Board (CSBS)Timetable • Draft standards & self assessment questionnaire in preparation • Wider consultation - Spring 2003 • Pilot visits - Summer 2003 • Scotland wide visits - October 2003
Some current draft standardsCSBS >70% admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours >90% having a CT or MR scan (within 7 days of admission) >90% of ischaemic strokes given aspirin within 48 hours of admission >80% of patients seen in Neurovascular clinics within 14 days A system is in place to collect data specified in the Scottish Minimum Data Set for all patients
The CHD & Stroke Strategy • All hospitals which routinely admit patients with acute stroke should introduce systems to facilitate the collection of a nationally-defined minimum dataset for each patient admitted, in order to allow monitoring of performance against nationally agreed standards
The CHD & Stroke Strategy • All hospitals which routinely admit patients with stroke should join the pilot phase if the Scottish Executive project to establish a National Monitoring System for hospital-based stroke services.
The CHD & Stroke Strategy • Hospitals will need to identify a lead clinician for this project as well as staff to ensure complete data collection. • Where an IT system already exists, resources should be identified to ensure its compatibility with nationally-agreed methods and datasets;
The CHD & Stroke Strategy • Further development work should be resourced to establish the feasibility and methods of linking the hospital-based systems with those in primary care, to allow capture of information relating to longer-term management of stroke patients and outcome.
Why should your hospital participate? • To identify deficiencies of service which can be addressed • To inform development of Managed Clinical Network • To meet data needs of CSBS • To help monitor progress of CHD & Stroke strategy • To meet requirements for appraisal & revalidation
Examples of Outputfrom SSCAS Based on data collection in Lothian
Hospital Comparisons on Inpatient Data • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary (RIE) n = 440 • Western General Hospital (WGH) n = 525 • St Johns Hospital (SJH) n = 185
Hospital Median Length of Stay RIE 21 days WGH 10 days SJH 12 days
Hospital Median Age RIE 77 years WGH 75.3 years SJH 73.4 years
WGH Specialisation across Lothian St Johns RIE
8 Days 4 days First NV Appointment Referral Received Event Referral 3 Days Median delays in accessing WGH Neurovascular Clinic Remember half the cases wait longer than the median!
Use of investigations in stroke & TIA in WGH Neurovascular Clinic (n=656)
Delays in CT scanning Neurovascular Patients with stroke or TIA (n=421) • Median delay from assessment to CT • 0 days • Median delay from last event to CT • 15 days • % scanned within 7 days of assessment • 85% • % scanned within 7 days of last event • 24%
£ £ £ Antithrombotic prescribing for ischaemic events in WGH Neurovascular Clinic (n=633)
£££ ££ £ Antihypertensive prescribing for ischaemic events in WGH Neurovascular Clinic (n=633)
£ £ £ Statin prescribing for ischaemic events in WGH Neurovascular Clinic (n=633)