1 / 15

Illuminating Monopole Dynamics in Full QCD with Dynamical Quarks

Investigating the role of Abelian monopoles and effects of light quarks on monopole dynamics in full QCD for color confinement. Simulation details, preliminary results, and potential implications are discussed.

jdrake
Download Presentation

Illuminating Monopole Dynamics in Full QCD with Dynamical Quarks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Theconfining potential and a low-energy effective monopole action under two flavours of dynamical quarks M. Hasegawa, K. Ishiguro, Y. Nakamura, T. Sekido, T. Suzuki University of Kanazawa and DESY (This was done as DESY-ITEP-Kanazawa (DIK) collaboration)

  2. Purpose: Color confinement is explained beautifully by the Abelian dual Meissner effect due to monopole condensation in pure QCD (Ref. Koma et. al. Nucl. Phys. 119,676(2003) and ref. therein) What happens in full QCD ? 1) To study the role of Abelian monopoles in full QCD and 2) to clarify the effect of dynamical light quarks on monopole dynamics are our purposes. Previously (DIK: Ref. Phys Rev D.70.074511 (2004)) we investigated these problems using configurations with m¼550 ~ 1100 [MeV] and observed some effects of dynamical quarks on monopoles. But the results are not so largely different from those in pure QCD. Here we report the results of our study using new configurations with lighter pion masses (~300[MeV]).

  3. Simulation details We perform our simulations with two flavours of non-purtubatively improved clover Wilson fermion and Wilson gluonic actions. ・Simulation parameters are listed (New Configurations are generated using BlueGene at KEK by Kanazawa group and using BlueGene Jülich and Edinburg by QCDSF) We perform abelian (MA) gauge fixing for those configurations New configurationes!

  4. Method After MA gauge-fixing, we extract Abelian link fields and monopoles and evaluate Abelian and monopole quantities. In SU(2)case for simplicity： U : non-Abelian link variable C : off-diagonal part u : diagonal part Abelian field strength : monopole current

  5. Abelian and non-Abelian static potentials preliminary Abelian dominance is seen in the linear part also in full QCD.

  6. Monopole, Abelian and photon static potentials preliminary Monopoles are responsible for the linear potential.

  7. Abelian dominance and monopole dominance (abelian)/(nonabelian) new data (monopole)/(abelian) m = 400 [MeV] new data m = 400 [MeV] m = 337 [MeV] m = 337 [MeV] preliminary preliminary (abelian) / (nonabelian) ¼ 0.9 (monopole)/(abelian) ¼ 0.8 The left figure shows “Abelian dominance” and the right figure shows “monopole dominance”.

  8. Monopole Cluster Monopoles form as cluster since the conservation law exists. Clusters of monopole are divided into two parts (i) Large cluster infrared (ii) Small cluster ultraviolet The separation becomes clearer when the physical volume is larger. large cluster small cluster

  9. Monopole density monopole density is defined as , preliminary Saturation is seen for both cases!

  10. (monopole)  Gribov copies ・ Gribov copy effects are important in MA gauge-fixing. This figure shows the dependence of Gribov copies for the monopole string tension.

  11. : gauge-fixing condition An effective monopole action ・ An effective monopole action is defined in the following; Effective monopole action : Fadeev-Popov determinant

  12. An effective monopole action and block spin transformation Effective monopole action can be obtained by Inverse Monte-Carlo method. Block-spin (type 2) transformation of monopoles:

  13. Effective monopole action dependence of the self coupling G1. m = 444(4) [MeV] New data m = 400(4) [MeV] G1 decreases as is smaller

  14. Block spin renormalization trajectory m  = 400(4) [MeV] m  = 444(4) [MeV] b = na number of block spin : n quenched QCD old DIK data NEW data! Clear dependence on pion masses is seen in the renormalization trajectories!!

  15. Summary and conclusion • Abelian and monopole dominances are observed also for these light quark masses. • Monopoles are responsible for the linear part of the static potential. • The behavior of block spin trajectories is seen to depend on the pion mass clearly. The reason is not known yet, but interesting. • To study the chiral and the continuum limits is important. • It is also interesting to study monopole effects on the finite-temperature phase transition in full QCD with lighter quark masses. • We are planning to study the finite-temperature case.

More Related