1 / 9

Emotional factors in memory

Emotional factors in memory. Emotional input may affect memory in at least two ways: Repression (motivated forgetting) Flashbulb memories The status of both these concepts is disputed. For each process: What is involved? Evidence for Evidence against. www.psychlotron.org.uk. Repression.

jeckhoff
Download Presentation

Emotional factors in memory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emotional factors in memory • Emotional input may affect memory in at least two ways: • Repression (motivated forgetting) • Flashbulb memories • The status of both these concepts is disputed. For each process: • What is involved? • Evidence for • Evidence against www.psychlotron.org.uk

  2. Repression conscious • Freudian idea that forgetting happens for a reason • Thoughts & memories that are painful are forced out of consciousness www.psychlotron.org.uk unconscious

  3. Repression • Extreme trauma • E.g. child abuse, military combat • Everyday forgetting • E.g. dental appointments, tax return • There are no mental accidents – whatever you forget, you have ‘chosen’ to forget it www.psychlotron.org.uk

  4. Repression • Experimental evidence • Levinger & Clark (1961) found PPs had poorer recall of emotionally negative words (e.g. ‘fight’, ‘fear’) • Klein (1972) found PPs had poorer recall for a wordlist when they had been insulted by the experimenter during learning • Support the idea that repression of emotionally negative material occurs www.psychlotron.org.uk

  5. Repression • Exp’tal findings have problems: • Replications of Levinger & Clark have found recall for negative words higher after a delay • Klein’s PPs might have been distracted during learning or demotivated during recall www.psychlotron.org.uk

  6. Repression • Case study evidence: • Event-specific amnesia e.g. criminals unable to recall committing crimes • Post-traumatic amnesia e.g. disrupted recall of combat veterans • Recovered memories e.g. of sexual abuse in childhood www.psychlotron.org.uk

  7. Repression • Lots of clinical support, but: • Cannot eliminate deliberately feigned amnesia, influence of alcohol, drugs (criminal cases) • In other cases, still difficult to distinguish unwillingness from inability to remember • In many trauma cases, the problem is flashbacks, not forgetting www.psychlotron.org.uk

  8. Repression • Recovered memory evidence has many problems: • Often impossible to validate claims due to lack of corroboration • Possibility of iatrogenic false memories (see Loftus) www.psychlotron.org.uk

  9. Repression • Evaluation • Best evidence come from occasional compelling cases • Experimental and much clinical evidence is weak • Probably does happen, but not often; Freud’s suggestion that most forgetting is repression is not sustainable www.psychlotron.org.uk

More Related