210 likes | 483 Views
UNCLASSIFIED. . PURPOSE: To provide a overview of the Army's path forward to Unified Battle CommandOBJECTIVES: By the end of this presentation you will be able to: A. Understand the Army's definition of the Battle Command Essential Capabilities B. Understand the Army's intent in pursuing UBCC. Be aware of opportunities and challenges in achieving UBC.
E N D
1. Command and Control Roadmap Session 3
20 August, 0930-1030
2. PURPOSE: To provide a overview of the Army’s path forward to Unified Battle Command
OBJECTIVES: By the end of this presentation you will be able to:
A. Understand the Army’s definition of the Battle Command Essential Capabilities
B. Understand the Army’s intent in pursuing UBC
C. Be aware of opportunities and challenges in achieving UBC
3. COL David Moore (PEO C3T PM BC)
Battle Command Essential Capabilities
UBC Overview
UBC TOC Activities
Mr. Eric Goodman (FCS PM BC)
FCS Refresher
UBC Platform Activities
UBC System Engineering Tasks
Mr. Michael Anthony (CERDEC C2D)
UBC Organization and 120 Day Study
S&T Investment in Meeting UBC Needs
4. Genesis of the Current Effort The VCSA convened a series of four C4ISR Summits to holistically address problem areas in the programmatic execution for Army Battle Command
The Army was creating three different forces – FCS – Maneuver Brigade Combat Teams – and everyone else
Were not designing for interoperability and backwards compatibility
Not all parts of the force would receive improved capability (non FCS or non Maneuver BCTs thus creating “haves” and “have-nots”)
We were building duplication and hence not affordable
Summit II proposed a concept – Unified Battle Command (UBC) as a solution to address the above problems
UBC is a Strategy NOT a product or Program of Record (POR)
Uses a System of Systems Approach
Represents a federation of Battle Command Applications designed to deliver a suite of consistent Battle Command functions for the entire force
Is a component of the overall Army LandWarNet / Battle Command Strategy
Tasking from Summit III – Review the 7+1 Commander’s Needs
Determine the essential Battle Command information and functions that must be digitally compatible between multiple versions and types of applications via the network
5. The Critical Path to UBC A robust communications network interoperable across tiers (air, ground, & satellite)
Connects leaders and soldiers to the network via multiple paths
Extend the network to sensors and lower tactical elements
Supports Major Combat Operations (MCO) and Stability Operations (SO)
Expands or extends to meet commander’s priorities
A suite of integrated Battle Command applications
Tailorable to the mission of the Cdr and Functional Staff
Display information on a common geospatial reference
BC Data/information is stored and shared in common formats
Using a common user interface – look and feel
Collaboration (in multiple forms) from command posts to Leaders and Soldiers
Rich Command Post Collaborative Environment at BDE – Battalion - Company
Lesser collaboration environment Company-Platoon-Squad-Team-Soldier
6. Cdr and Universal Needs to Achieve Essential BC Capabilities
7. Unified Battle Command Vision (briefed to VCSA)
8. UBC Long-term Schedule
9. TOC Near-Term Challenges
10. TOC Near-Term Pilot Efforts
11. Mr. Eric Goodman (FCS PM BC)
FCS Refresher
UBC Platform Activities
UBC System Engineering Tasks
12. Army’s Future Combat System(Networked Battle Command) Common Operating Environment
SOSCOE supports net-centric services for a variety of platforms
Weapons (safety critical /real-time operations)
Future Force Manned Systems (Vehicle) Infrastructure Services
Unattended Systems Connectivity
Networked Battle Command Infrastructure Services
One Battle Command Application
Role Based Functionality
Situational Awareness & Collaboration
Vehicle Systems / Weapon
Platform Control
Unmanned Systems Control
Sensor Control & Data fusion
System Status & Logistics
Embedded Training
13. FCS Battle Command(with Embedded Training / M&S)
14. Notional SW Contribution to UBC Platform
15. Notional Converged Platform SW Arch
16. Mr. Michael Anthony (CERDEC C2D)
UBC Organization and 120 Day Study
S&T Investment in Meeting UBC Needs
17. Objective: Develop a 2013 UBC Initial Operating Capability (IOC) with enough detail to inform the 2011-2015 Mini-POM and ARFORGEN Capability Set development 120 Day UBC Study Objective
18. Develop and demonstrate multi-platform, cross community applications and software services to facilitate the unification of Battle Command S&T Investment
19. Demonstrate feasibility of using “WMI” in non-FCS environment
Develop approaches for JCR visualization built from FCS WMI components
JCR Infrastructure dependencies & alternatives
Examine SOSCOE Services that could/should be integrated in JCR/JBC-P
Collaboration
Universal Collaboration Bridge to interface different collaboration systems
Participate in BC Net-centric Pilot
Develop open framework for 3rd party collaboration developers
COBRA Near-term: Prototyping
20. COBRA Mid-Term: Products Multi-platform, cross-community applications and software services
Collaboration Services
Decision Support Software Products
Planning Support Services
Priority Information Requirements (PIR) Management Tools
Collection / Sensor Management Tools
Commercial/Joint Mapping Tool Kit (C/JMTK) Enhancements
Unified net-centric data strategies
Common architecture and framework across Intel/Ops/Geo communities
21. Context has been set with the updated statement of the Commanders Needs
UBC Represents a federation of Battle Command Applications designed to deliver a suite of consistent Battle Command functions for the entire force
Challenges are management, system-of-system, and technical