60 likes | 208 Views
Introduction I. Legal Models II. Legal Threats III. Legal Solutions Conclusion. Getting from Collective Intelligence to Collective Action. by Tom W. Bell Professor, Chapman University School of Law www.tomwbell.com.
E N D
Introduction I. Legal Models II. Legal Threats III. Legal Solutions Conclusion Getting from Collective Intelligence to Collective Action by Tom W. Bell Professor, Chapman University School of Law www.tomwbell.com Collective Intelligence Foo Camp, Google & O'Reilly Media, the Googleplex, Mountain View, California, February 22-23, 2008
Introduction I. Legal Models II. Legal Threats III. Legal Solutions Conclusion I.A Legal Models: Distinguishing Means
Introduction I. Legal Models II. Legal Threats III. Legal Solutions Conclusion I.B. Legal Models: Distinguishing Ends
Introduction I. Legal Models II. Legal Threats III. Legal Solutions Conclusion II. Legal Threats A. CFTC Regulations 1. Especially if public and if hedging offered. 2. Little threat to in-house PMs. B. SEC Regulations 1. Claims might constitute securities. 2. In-house PMs could facilitate insider trading. a. Liability for employees and employer. b. Notably, play-money offers no cure. C. Anti-Gambling Regulations
Introduction I. Legal Models II. Legal Threats III. Legal Solutions Conclusion III. Legal Solutions A. Go Hedgestreet: CFTC-Regulated Retail Market B. Avoid SEC’s Insider Trading Regulations 1. Management-only market; 2. Window on trading certain claims; or 3. Publicize market results. C. Win Legislative Cover D. Dodge “Gambling” Label 1. Follow PurePlay’s (patented) business model. 2. Keep in-house and require employees to play. 3. Pay independent contractor researchers. . . a. A low commission/trade, plus . . . b. A bonus for correct predictions.
Introduction I. Legal Models II. Legal Threats III. Legal Solutions Conclusion Conclusion How can we clear up the legal uncertainty that currently inhibits real-money PMs, be they public or private, in the U.S.? Set a precedent. Do good works--a quake market, for instance--and seek declaratory judgment. That’s not risk-free, granted, but neither is continuing to suffer collective ignorance.