1 / 12

Annual Implementation Reports (AIR) 2014: Programme Activity and Evaluation

This report outlines the 7-8 years of programme activity in the DG REGIO B2-European Semester & Evaluation, focusing on the Annual Implementation Reports (AIR) process, categorization, core indicators, and next steps.

jharold
Download Presentation

Annual Implementation Reports (AIR) 2014: Programme Activity and Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Annual Implementation.Reports (AIR) 2014… on 7 8 years of programme activity DG REGIO B2-European Semester & Evaluation

  2. Outline • Annual Implementation Reports (AIR) process • Categorisation - Tracking the inputs • Core Indicators – measuring the outputs • Next steps & Conclusions

  3. 1. 2014 AIR process (ERDF/CF) • Securing accurate data … still slow … (but might be faster than in 2014 !!) • At end-October 2015 • 231 of 322 programmes accepted = 71% • 91 programmes still between DG REGIO / MAs

  4. AIR 2014 treatment – MA/DG REGIO

  5. … or in relative terms

  6. 2. Categorisation Project selection – 2014 Main Messages: • 99% ERDF/CF covered by selectedprojects @ end-2014 (Capped at 100% MS allocation) • Varies from 70% to over 160% by MS/TC • Expenditureaverage at 76% of decidedamounts Stillsome data reliability issues • Mis-allocations / reporting… • HU ENV OP – not in EUR • MS averagehides variations within programmes • High over programming in some programmes => unreliablepicture due to dormant project

  7. Turning project selection to spending (2014 selection vs 2014 spend – WP 13)

  8. 3. Core Indicators - measuring outputsERDF/CF • Delayed finalisation of nearly 30% of OP AIR !!! • Plausibility checks by REGIO => Manual corrections & analysis still done by REGIO • WP zero consistency will be done once AIR critical mass achieved: • Consistency of definitions / Measurement units • Underreporting of Core indicators … AIR text vs SFC data

  9. Current OPEN DATA 2007-13 – from AIR 2013 10 core indicators

  10. Preliminary picture … 2014 AIR

  11. 4. Next Steps AIR 2014 • "Work in progress" for 30 % of programmes • 2007-2013 OPEN Data platform will be updated in later in 2015 with 2014 data (excel files online also for researchers) Ex-Post 2007-2013 • Work Package "zero" wasfinalisedearlyin 2015 on 2013 values • Thematic packages use 2013 output data. • 2014 data will be factored into the ex-post 2007-2013 synthesis report Final Impl. Reports (spring 2017): • Reconcile categorisation data with final declaration • Final statement of outputs achieved

  12. Preliminary conclusions • Reported achievements (outputs) showing steady progress • Data exchange is very slow, strong lags and not always reliable • Individual errors distort the aggregate picture and the efforts of all programmes • Assessment to be finalised later in 2015. Please accelerate corrections!

More Related