150 likes | 162 Views
Explore the historical development and current workings of Italy's judiciary system, including the Constitutional Court and the clash between politics and justice.
E N D
The rule of lawNeutral institutions and political conflicts Maurizio Cotta - Luca VerzichelliIl sistema politico italiano Chapter 9
Topics of this chapter • The 1948 Constitution and the Bill of Rights • The Constitutional Court • The judicial institutions
Before democracy • During the liberal era, the judiciary was simply a low-professional sector of the public administration • The creation of the Superior Board of the Judiciary (CSM) in 1907 has been a possible development towards a growing professionalization • The fascism arranged a complete subordination of the judiciary to the government
The 1948 Constitution • The new rigid Constitution entailed three advances: • A designation of the citizens’ rights, although the courts were partially ineffective until the 1960s • The creation of the Constitutional Court • A full-detailed organization for the judiciary
The Constitutional Court: functions • Judicial review on national and regional laws • Resolution of institutional conflicts • Court for the impeached Heads of the State • Judgment on the viability of referenda
The Constitutional Court: selection • The Court is selected for a nine-years mandate by • Head of the State • Parliament • Judiciary
The judiciary: general organization • Four different branches actually exist: • Ordinary • Administrative • Economic • Military
The characteristics of the ordinary judiciary • Partition between civil and penal justice • The judiciary is independent from the government • The judiciary’s autonomy is guaranteed by the CSM • The prosecutor is part of the judiciary • Prosecutors and judges share the same career • Career based only on seniority
The CSM: composition • 3 required members • 16 members elected by the judiciary • 8 members elected by the parliament
The clash between politics and justice • In 1992: • Extended corruption • Organization of the judiciary • Abolition of the parliamentary immunity • After 1994: • Repeated unachieved reforms
Conclusion • The Constitution and the Constitutional Court have promoted the citizens’ rights … • … but the misconduct of the judiciary has impaired them • Unresolved problems: • Unconstrained power of the prosecutor • Lack of accountability of the prosecutor • Unproductive selection and career of the judges