1 / 14

HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010

Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) - Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Henry Gourdji Chief, Safety Oversight Audit Section. HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010. 1. HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010. Overview. Background Our Marching Orders

jirair
Download Presentation

HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (USOAP) - Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA)Henry GourdjiChief, Safety Oversight Audit Section HIGH LEVEL SAFETY CONFERENCE Montreal 29 March 2010 1 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  2. Overview • Background • Our Marching Orders • Objective of CMA • Transition Plan • Impact on Member States • CMA Benefits 2 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  3. Mandatory Audit Programme (USOAP) 1999 – 2004 Annexes 1, 6, 8 Annex-by-Annex Approach Comprehensive Systems Approach 2005 + 2010 Safety-related Provisions in all Safety-related Annexes CMA USOAP beyond 2010 A36-4 35TH A S S E M B L Y ’04 36TH A S S E M B L Y ’07 Background – Evolution of the USOAP 3 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  4. Consider options for the evolution of USOAP beyond 2010 based on the concept of continuous monitoring. To incorporate the analysis of safety risk factors, and apply them on a universal basis, to assess, on an ongoing basis, States’ oversight capability. Assembly Resolution A36-4 refers Our Marching Orders 4 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  5. CMA Developed with Global Input CMA WORKING GROUP CMA ADVISORY GROUP CMA STEERING COMITTEE CMA METHODOLOGY 5 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  6. Study • Comprehensive Study performed July 2008 • Identified all Options, Advantages /Disadvantages versus Associated costs CMA Selected the Best Approach for the Future ICAO Council • Study Group Results presented to ANC (181st) & Council (185th) Session • Council Decision to support CMA as the best option forward (C-WP/13356 refers) Transition Plan • CMA to include a transition plan to prepare States and ICAO • Following the transition period CMA will be launched starting 2013 6 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  7. Promote global aviation safety through continuously monitoring States’ safety oversight capabilities Enhance States’ safety oversight and safety management capabilities by: Identifying safety deficiencies; Assessing associated safety risks; Developing strategies for intervention and assistance; and Prioritize assistance. Objective of USOAP- CMA Beyond 2010 7 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  8. Transition Plan • 2013 • State • Update CAP • Update SAAQ • Audit protocols • ICAO • CBT Auditor Training • Intervention strategies • ICVMs • Safety audits • CSA audits + limited • 2012 • State • Update CAP • Update SAAQ • Audit protocols • ICAO • CBT Auditor Training • Intervention strategies • ICVM missions • Safety audits • 2011 • State • Update CAP • Update SAAQ • ICAO • DOC 9735 • Seminar Workshops • CBT Auditor Training • ICVM missions • Expand agreements 8 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  9. States • Internal Stakeholders • External Stakeholders • Analysis of safety risk factors • Assessing the safety level of State aviation activities using the 8 critical elements • Evaluating State safety management capabilities • Integrated safety analysis Collect & Validate Safety Data Analyze and measure States safety oversight capability CMA Cycle Chart Develop & Implement Intervention Strategies Identify & Prioritize Deficiencies • Strategies such as: • CSA Audits • Limited CSA Audits • ICVMs • Safety Audits • Other missions • Mandatory Information requests • Findings and Recommendations • SSCs 9 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  10. Sign a new MoU • Identify a National Continuous Monitoring Coordinator (NCMC) (formerly NSOC) • Manage the online State Aviation Activity Questionnaire (SAAQ) • The NCMC and other State personnel receive training on using the CMA online framework • Periodically update their USOAP audit corrective action plan State obligations during the transition period 10 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  11. Transition from a one-time assessment activity “snap-shot” to a continuous monitoring process Provides for collective sharing of safety data Establishes continuous monitoring of States’ safety oversight capabilities Allows for identification of safety risks Should evolve to monitor the safety performance of Member States CMA Benefits 11 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  12. Real time and interactive online system (WebSupported) Long term, cost effective, resource efficient and sustainable approach. A layered approach will incorporate various Intervention activities, including full CSA audits and limited audits depending on the level of information made available by States. CMA Benefits 12 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  13. Consistent with the policy of the Organization to pursue a proactive approach to safety under the safety management concept Promotes and encourages the sharing of safety information by regional and international organizations. CMA Benefits 13 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

  14. Thank you 14 HLSC, 29 March to 1 April 2010

More Related