250 likes | 401 Views
Prof. Konstantinos G. Zografos Athens University of Economics and Business TRANsportation Systems and Logistics Laboratory (TRANSLOG) e-mail: translog@aueb.gr. WP2: Transportation trends and energy implications. CONTENTS. Objectives Conceptual framework Freight transport energy use
E N D
Prof. Konstantinos G. Zografos Athens University of Economics and Business TRANsportation Systems and Logistics Laboratory (TRANSLOG) e-mail: translog@aueb.gr WP2: Transportation trends and energy implications
CONTENTS • Objectives • Conceptual framework • Freight transport energy use • Passenger transport energy use • Concluding remarks
OBJECTIVES • Identify the relationship between freight/passenger transport and energy • Take into account the evolution of the political, socio-economic and technological environment
FREIGHT TRANSPORT ENERGY USE(II) SCM TRENDS EFFECTS ON FREIGHT TRANSPORT SYSTEM UTILIZATION INDICATORS INFLUENCING ENERGY USE IN FREIGHT TRANSPORT PEST DRIVERS • Fiscal • Transport • Environmental • Energy • Land use • Regional development • Globalization • GDP • E-commerce • ICT • Spatial concentration of inventory and production • Wider geographical sourcing and distribution • Vertical disintegration • Outsourcing • Direct and Nominated day deliveries • Reverse logistics • Development of break-bulk/transhipment systems • Freight transport demand(ton-km/capita, veh-km/capita) • Freight transport modal split • Average length of haul • Load factor • Handling factor • Freight transport vehicle consumption • Number of trips • Length of trips • Frequency of trips • Vehicle utilization • Penetration of alternative vehicle technologies • Fleet composition • Energy efficiency • Fuel supply infrastructure
CONCLUDING REMARKS – FREIGHT TRANSPORT (I) • Major drivers of the broader environment: • Globalization / market deregulation • Technological progress • Growing affluence • Policy changes (fiscal, transport, environmental, energy use, land use and regional development) • Growing economies of scale • Mass customization • These drivers contribute to an ever-increasing intensity of freight transportation.
CONCLUDING REMARKS – FREIGHT TRANSPORT (II) • Freight transportation service characteristics: • Use of more energy efficient freight transportation vehicles • Improvement in vehicle utilization, higher load factors and reduction of empty runs • Increase of the use of intermodal freight transportation
CONCLUDING REMARKS – FREIGHT TRANSPORT (III) • Scenarios should consider the following trends: • Increasing demand for freight transport services • Increasing fuel efficiency for freight transport vehicles • Increasing efficiency in the use of freight transport vehicles • Increasing intermodality, leading to different modal split
CONCLUDING REMARKS – FREIGHT TRANSPORT (IV) • Trends affect the following freight transport utilization characteristics: • Number of trips • Length of trips • Frequency of trips • Vehicle utilization
CONCLUDING REMARKS – FREIGHT TRANSPORT (V) • Modelling energy use in freight transport should consider the following indicators: • Freight transport demand (ton-km/capita, veh-km/capita) • Freight transport modal split • Average length of haul • Load factor • Handling factor • Freight transport vehicle fuel consumption
PASSENGER TRANSPORT ENERGY USE(II) EFFECTS ON PASSENGER TRANSPORT SYSTEM UTILIZATION INDICATORS INFLUENCING ENERGY USE IN PASSENGER TRANSPORT PEST DRIVERS MOBILITY TRENDS • Fiscal • Transport • Environmental • Energy • Land use and spatial development • Social life-styles • Population demographics • Globalization • GDP • Penetration ofalternative vehicle technologies • Car ownership • Traffic management technologies • Fleet composition • Energy efficiency • Vehicle technologies • ICT • Fuel supply infrastructure • Increase in mobility • Virtual mobility (tele-shopping, tele-working) • Time and space compression (travelling further-faster) • Decrease in public transport use • Increase in private car use • Number of trips • Distances travelled • Frequency of trips • Vehicle utilization • Passenger transport demand (pax-km) • Passenger transport modal split (pax-km/mode) • Vehicle occupancy rate • Average length of trips • Passenger vehicle fuel consumption
CONCLUDING REMARKS – PASSENGER TRANSPORT (I) • Major drivers of the broader PEST environment: • Growth in affluence • Globalisation, European integration and market deregulation • Growing economies of scale • Declining residential densities • Increased mobility (number and length of trips), faster and more flexible realization of mobility needs, increase in the use of private automobiles.
CONCLUDING REMARKS – PASSENGER TRANSPORT (II) • Passenger transport service characteristics: • Use of more energy efficient private automobiles • Increase in the more efficient use of private automobiles through more effective traffic management • Use of innovative demand management policies and measures • Substitution of travel by communication services • Efforts to redirect trips from road and air to environment-friendly public transport
CONCLUDING REMARKS – PASSENGER TRANSPORT (III) • Scenarios should consider the following trends: • Increasing demand for passenger transport services • Increasing fuel efficiency of private automobiles • More efficient use of automobiles • Introduction of policies and concepts for more efficient travel demand management
CONCLUDING REMARKS – PASSENGER TRANSPORT (IV) • Characteristics of passenger transport system utilization affected by mobility trends: • Number of trips produced • Distances travelled • Frequency of trips • Vehicle utilization • Choice of fuels
CONCLUDING REMARKS – PASSENGER TRANSPORT (V) • Modelling energy use in passenger transport should consider the following indicators: • Passenger transport system demand (pax-km) • Modal split per transport mode (pax-km/mode) • Vehicle occupancy rate • Average length of trips • Passenger car fuel consumption