230 likes | 451 Views
The BP Round. (Opening Government)Prime MinisterDeputy Prime Minister(Closing Government)Member of GovernmentGovernment Whip. (Opening Opposition)Leader of OppositionDeputy Leader of Opp.(Closing Opposition)Member of OppositionOpposition Whip. . The BP Round. (OG)PMDPM(CG)MGGW. (OO
E N D
1. Advanced BP Seminar
2. The BP Round (Opening Government)
Prime Minister
Deputy Prime Minister
(Closing Government)
Member of Government
Government Whip (Opening Opposition)
Leader of Opposition
Deputy Leader of Opp.
(Closing Opposition)
Member of Opposition
Opposition Whip
3. The BP Round (OG)
PM
DPM
(CG)
MG
GW (OO)
LO
DLO
(CO)
MO
OW
4. Speaker Roles: PM Define the grounds of the debate
Outline the government case
Deliver substantive material/argumentation
5. Speaker Roles: LO (dont) challenge definitions
Outline the opposition case
Deliver substantive material/argumentation
Clash with PMs arguments
6. Speaker Roles: DPM Deliver substantive material/argumentation
Clash with LOs arguments
Reconstruct
7. Speaker Roles: DLO Deliver substantive material/argumentation
Clash with matter on the table
DPM = 1st priority
PMs standing arguments
Reconstruct
8. Speaker Roles: MG Deliver extension
Clash with OO material (especially DLO)
9. Speaker Roles: MO Deliver extension
Clash with matter on the table
Special responsibility to engage MG
Also engage OG
10. Speaker Roles: GW (clash with MO)
Summarize the debate
11. Speaker Roles: OW Summarize the debate
12. General Tips Rebuttal
No judging on flow
Attack their strengths
Structure
Signpost, outline, summarize
POIs --> very important in BP
Teamwork
Follow the rules & fulfill your role!
13. Strategy: OG You construct a debate and a case
Constructing the debate:
Make sure its winnable (and losable!)
Clarity in definition/limitation of scope
The axes of debate
You need to think about these
What are the big, relevant, interesting issues (on both sides?)
14. Strategy: OG Importance of Case Construction
How to construct:
Be clear!
Know your burden & have a plan to win
Questions that need answers:
What is the problem?
What is the proposed solution?
What are the benefits of the plan?
What are the costs of the plan?
Is it worth it?
One way to win
lots of ways to lose (exageration, but important). Much easier for them to oppose your construct than your substantive material
and allowed. So avoid that by constructing well!
Additional question (possible: what are the barriers/why do they not exist)
One way to win
lots of ways to lose (exageration, but important). Much easier for them to oppose your construct than your substantive material
and allowed. So avoid that by constructing well!
Additional question (possible: what are the barriers/why do they not exist)
15. How an OG wins Two criteria: set up a good debate, matter still in the round at the end
How to do this?
1) clear, fair construct that sets up a good round
2) debate really well, so that either:
A) you demolish 1st opposition
B) the 1st half is really good
16. Speech Strategy: PM Should be best speech of the round
Passion, great analysis, examples, structure
Control the debate: get on strong Gov ground
Trap the LO:
Traps
Set up arguments you have responses to
Address the key issues
17. Speech Strategy: The DPM Really important speech --> only OG clash!
Should have important, deep substantive contribution
Demolish the LO
Easier if youve anticipated their arguments/the PM has set them up
Set up a strategic choice for the DLO Note about anticipation: always argue what happened, not what was anticipated
if you anticipate all the good arguments, then if they come up with something else it should be easy to beat (because its less good)
Sometimes they just come up with brilliant, new stuff
deal with it as best you can
Strategic Choice for DLO:
as simple as you beat their partner
do they shift or continue to lose
More complicated
questions with no right answerNote about anticipation: always argue what happened, not what was anticipated
if you anticipate all the good arguments, then if they come up with something else it should be easy to beat (because its less good)
Sometimes they just come up with brilliant, new stuff
deal with it as best you can
Strategic Choice for DLO:
as simple as you beat their partner
do they shift or continue to lose
More complicated
questions with no right answer
18. Strategy: OO Role = defeat the OG, introduce own substantive matter
Translation: kick the government in the teeth
Seize control of the round
Prep: similar to OG
Know the big questions/big issues & your stance
During the PM:
Figure out whats a) the debate & b) the case
Decide where you fit --> choose a stance you dont just have to beat them, to win the whole round you must beat them conclusivelyyou dont just have to beat them, to win the whole round you must beat them conclusively
19. Speech Strategy: LO Frame the round
Outline your case (where you fit)
Make constructive arguments
Attack the case
Model opp
Refutation & rebuttal
Summarize & challenge
20. Speech Strategies: DLO Goal = be so clear and decisive that people no longer feel like having a second half
Dont go it alone
building on the set-up from your partner
Your points should be really smart
Refutation - sparing (should be mostly done)
Rebuttal - huge for DLO
Summary - set the terms for the CG
21. Strategy: Closing House Three jobs:
Clash (and win)
Say something new (and better)
Summarize (well)
Strategy = so context-dependent
But again - what are the big issues, where do you fit?
Always think strategically
Fun because rules so vague - so much flexibility
22. Speech Strategy: MG/MO Make sure to engage/clash (especially MO)
Extension
Anything new counts
That doesnt mean its good => think strategically
23. Speech Strategy : Whip Goal = summary
But a biased summary that makes you win
Doing a lot of rebuttal work as you go (fine line to walk)
Summarise thematically
What are the big issues - where did everyone fit?
If you construct your extension well, this should follow naturally