90 likes | 249 Views
Common themes and next steps…. Patrick Feng, Workshop Rapporteur, WAP-W3C mobile privacy workshop. Common themes - 1. User control is recognized by all as an underlying goal Users have high expectations for trust in the mobile environment
E N D
Common themes and next steps… Patrick Feng, Workshop Rapporteur, WAP-W3C mobile privacy workshop
Common themes - 1 • User control is recognized by all as an underlying goal • Users have high expectations for trust in the mobile environment • P3P is an important starting point for addressing privacy, but it does not address the whole privacy challenge • Whole solution remains to be defined • Performance issues
Common themes - 2 • Challenges of assuring privacy given different business models • Should utilize privacy as an opportunity rather than just legal obligation • Expand dialogue with legal and public policy communities • Give feedback; learn about requirements • Further collaboration between WAP and W3C
[Comments] • Want consistent privacy experience across wired and wireless environments • Need for UI guidelines • Business models impact security/trust models – but need to partner across… • Need to allow for expression of preferences and also for exceptions
Next steps - 1 • P3P vocabulary extension for mobile web environment: • location • state • device profiles • other? Q: Where to do the work? (There is an ext. mechanism) • Who will come up with use cases? Who could be liaisons for future action items?
Next steps - 2 • Need for integration of CC/PP, UAProf, and P3P? Q: How/where to do this? • Need to identify appropriate group(s) to work further on privacy issues?
Next steps - 3 • General use cases for mobile privacy and architectural requirements • Collaboration zone for exchange of documents (IPR) • Investigate user interface: What are best practices for informing mobile users about privacy?
Next steps - 4 • Both W3C and WAP should identify process for moving ahead with joint work e.g., think of history that led to Loc-DC • on WAP side: Stefan to raise issue with SRC, and report back to WAP-W3C CG on how WAP will proceed
[More comments] • UI: MET close to WAP? (Or, can WAP begin to suggest groups that could look at UI issues?) • Should there be a joint WG on privacy? • Are “mobile needs” (that may not be covered by P3P) going to be handled by WAP, or joint group, or…? • Liaisons? Reason to meet again? • Question for WAP to consider: does WAP want to work on joint project(s) with W3C? • Resolved: have timetable for action by Feb. 2001.