270 likes | 440 Views
Anticlericalism and renewal in the late-medieval Church. Religion and Religious Change in England, c.1470-1558. Duality: Church was at one an immensely power and wealthy institution And the very body of Christ - His spirit resided in believers.
E N D
Anticlericalism and renewal in the late-medieval Church. Religion and Religious Change in England, c.1470-1558
Duality: • Church was at one an immensely power and wealthy institution • And the very body of Christ - His spirit resided in believers. • Contradiction – open it up to charges of hypocrisy and irreligion. • Problem for all organised religions: • preach the rejection of the world, but have to exist in it. • Poverty, rejection of the world and this life in favour of the next: • very visibly in tension with the realities of funding that lifestyle and the political power which the Church inevitably wielded. • Especially re: monasteries. The ‘Church’ problem:
Traditional view: • D. Knowles – declining zeal after the Anglo-Saxon period. • Increased ‘worldliness’ led to a loss of calling, and left the Orders unpopular and open to criticism at the Reformation. • Revisionists: • B. Harvey, R. Swanson, J. Clark, K. Stober – role changing. • Orders adapted themselves to the world, and became centres of innovation. • Redefined cultural movements outside the monastery’s walls in light of ideals from within them. The Religious Orders:
Used to be seen as an obvious ‘cause’ of the Reformation. • Historiography: • For: A.G. Dickens The English Reformation (2nd ed 1989); ‘The Shape of Anticlericalism and the English Reformation’ in E Kouri and T Scott eds. Politics and Society in Reformation Europe (1987) and in Dickens’ - riposte to Haigh. • Against: C. Haigh: ‘Anticlericalism and the English Reformation’, History (1983). • See also: R.N. Swanson, ‘Problems of the Priesthood in Pre-Reformation England’, English Historical Review, (1990). • But what can historians do with criticism? • Can we cut through it to see if the clergy were fulfilling their role? • Perhaps it was actually a sign that the Church was healthy? Anticlericalism:
Position & Status: Parish Priests: • ‘Secular’ – parish priests, itinerant priests. • ‘Religious’ – those in orders, separate from the world. • C. 1500 – 30,000 in England: • 1/3 Parish Priests • Rest itinerant Priests, friars, monks. • Separate: • Visibly distinct from the clergy • Embodies their role as sacerdotal mediators of grace. • Dress • Addressed as ‘Sir’. • Outside civil law: • Under the Church’s jurisdiction. • Celibate: • C11th • Danger of clerical dynasties. • Fundamentally about holiness: • Purity of handling the sacrament. • Related to how people understood their bodies. • Celibacy the ideal. • Ordination: • 1 of the 7 sacraments. • Performed by a Bishop. • Status depended upon this – NOT learning. • Patron: • Fund a Church, right to appoint. • Gentry, monastery, noble. • Clearly opportunity for corruption, favouritism and purchase of an office. • But Reformation not end the practice. • 10% University educated: • Would change at the Reformation. • Read, but not necessarily understand, Latin. • Ex opere. • Not a preacher: • Sermons not prevalent in Church. • 1281 by a degree by Archbishop Pelham. • Expound the faith 4X per annum. • Role is to perform sacraments and the liturgy. • Was this changing on the eve of the Reformation? The Clergy & their roles:
People not power: Other clerics: a varied body. • Religion as a verb: • Not there to teach their flock, but to pray from them, to guide them through the sacraments of the church – the rites which applied God’s grace to particular human situations. • Responsible for the spiritual wellbeing of his flock. • The community’s memory, and often its centre-point. • Shared a series of intimate – and emotional – moments with him. • For all his distance and distinction, part of the community. • Also its conscience – moral power an obvious source of conflict. • Chantry priests: • Masses for the dead. • Significant social role – but withdrawn. • Itinerant priests: • Scrape a living providing extra services. • Sometimes lay work, too – blurred the boundaries. • Tutors • Private chaplains in wealthy households. • Variation between parishes: • Size and character important for determining the precise nature of the priest’s role.
Ran a selection of parishes: • Impropriation. • Part of the fabric of social life: • Schools • University education. • European-wide scholarship. • Patronage of the arts and music. • Scriptural studies & printed books. • Landlords – farming essential • Devotions – essentially houses of prayer, logic of purgatory. • Social responsibilities – house travellers, clean roads, tend borders, bury royalty. • Thriving or declining? English evidence: • Benedictines building expand C15th • Increasing finery. • Numbers go up 30% 1400-1500 • Evidence from wills in Norwich & Salisbury shows people donating generously and frequently. • Perennial debate about monasticism & spiritual vitality: • A continual balancing act: vita contemplativavs vita activa: • Endowments, gifts, patronage meant that moving away from poverty. • Had to adapt to engagements in the world. • Dependent on how phrased. • No absolute standard. • Younger orders v. different to the older – debate & criticism. • Largely continued to provide cycle of canonical prayer, avoided moral depravity. • But: • Resisted Wolsey’s austerity reforms during the 1520s. • Ease with the world could lead to a loss of distinctiveness. • Voices of criticism who thought this was indicative of decline. • Increasingly expected to justify their position and privilege. Monasticism:
The ‘traditional’ view: • Simply case of ‘cause’ & ‘effect’. • Points of conflict: • Tithes • Worldly Bishops more interested in politics than piety • Lower clergy too stupid and uneducated to satisfy the growing desire for personal involvement in religion which the Reformation would eventually satiate. • Narrative of tension: • Statues of 1489, 1497, 1512 on benefits of clergy. • Hume/ Standing affair 1512-15 • Wolsey • Reformation parliament ‘anticlerical’ legislation. • Danger of teleology: • Move from the study of Church history through printed propaganda of reformers and other anti-clerical critics. • To how actually worked on the ground. • Education: • Not meeting C21st standards, but adequate for the role in the C15th. • Bishops active & engaged: • Chichester, Ely, Lincoln, Norwich and Winchester all engaged in substantial reform and re-engagement. • Diocesan administration • Improve clerical standards & pastoral activity. • Church Courts not tyrannous: • Delivered justice speedily, honourably and cheaply • That used so frequently by the laity suggests popular. • Complaints about tithes rare: • Diocese of Lichfield: 600 parishes – 10 tithe disputes 1525, 4 in 1530. • Haigh: Anticlericalism a localised affair. • But, there WAS criticism of the Church. Anticlericalism:
‘Yet if any of these were to reflect on the meaning of his linen vestment, snow-white in colour to indicate a pure and spotless life; or of his two-horned mitre, both peaks held together by a single knot, signifying perfect knowledge of both Old and New Testaments; of his hands, protected by gloves, symbolic of purity, untainted by any contact with human affairs, for administering the sacrament; of his crozier, a reminder of his watchful care of the flock entrusted to his keeping, or the cross carried before him as a symbol of his victory over all human persons – if, I say, any of them were reflect on these and many kindred matters, wouldn’t his life be full of care and many kindred matters, wouldn’t his life be full of care and trouble? But as things are, they think they do well when they’re looking after themselves, and responsibility for their sheep they either trust to Christ himself or delegate to their vicars and those they call brethren’. Erasmus, In Praise of Folly (1509)
1) What can historians make of criticism? • 2) Was this a reminder of an ideal, rather than its rejection? • 3) Or, is it evidence that the ideal form of clergy was changing before the Reformation? Three questions:
Scribner – anticlericalism as a language. • Critics actually clerics. • John Colet: • Dean of St. Paul’s. • Convocation of Canterbury in 1510 • Hoped for a large-scale campaign against clerical irregularity and indiscipline. • Rejuventation of the parishes by humanist educated clerics • And a way of hunting out Lollard heretics as a way of safeguarding the Church. • Results mixed. • Problem: • Did such rhetoric legitimise criticism of the clergy? • Severe self-criticism is laudable. • But it also means that it is hard to defend from attack. • KEY: this rhetorical traditional/self-examination may have left the Church vulnerable to Reform when it did emerge. Criticism:
Speak about medieval religion in terms that not really help us in understanding it. • THE Church; Catholicism; Institution • Sounds more bureaucratic, more homogenous than actually was or could be. • Rather an amalgam of voices interpreting Christ’s scriptures, doctrines, rituals and practices in often conflicting ways. • Blossoming of monasticism; but also those who severely critical of monasteries hiding away from world. • Stress communal experience of Christ in the Mass; also those who experience Him in an intensely personal manner – mystics. • Upsurge in rituals, pilgrimages, relics and other aspects of devotions; also those who thought that those aspects of the Church focussed too much on the material – rather than the contemplative – aspects of religion. • Point is: not mistake disagreement, discussion and debate as something fundamentally riddled with dissent. The Nature of the Church:
Conciliarism: • idea of the balance of power between bishops and the papacy was not cut and dry. • Some argued that when all bishops assembled in a general council of the Church it had more power than the Papacy. • Way of curbing political aspirations • Ensuring aspects of local tradition against assertions of papal uniformity. • Attempts at reform sincere, but lacking in success. • 1511 Council of Pisa • 1512-17 5th Lateran Council • Plenty of soul-searching, and tussling for power between the French monarchy and the Papacy • But inconclusive – memory of the schism in the previous century too neat for Papal reform to be considered. • DevotioModerna: • New style of C15th piety – intense, introspective and an imaginative mode of reaching out to God. • Series of practical action and organisation of thoughts and life encapsulated in The Imitation of Christ (best-seller). • New order: Brethren Of The Common Life. • Important members: Thomas a Kempis; Gabriel Biel; Pope Adrian VI. • But origins, C14th Dutch Geert Groote – never passed beyond Deacon. • Evidence of a ‘popular’ engagement in the Church, of pious activism. • Promised that the laity could aspire to the high personal standards that previously only attainable by the clergy. European renewal:
News orders: • Urge to self-reformation is perennial in a body of people who commit themselves to live in austerity. • The temptations and weakness of the flesh require constant safeguarding. • Hardly a century in Church history where calls for greater severity do not exist. • Ensure commitment to self-mortification and examination kept – even more severe C14th and C15th. • Franciscans: • Various branches almost compete between to be the most severe in inflicting the agonies of self-examination. • Spain, Cardinal Ximenes bolstered the Observant Franciscans • 1507 – Minims in Spain and France • 1529 – Capuchins in Italy. • Ireland – Gaelic parts in West. • KEY: vehemently pious men actively lobbying to found new Orders; and that there was demand for them. • English orders: • Benedictines. • C14th strict proposal of papal rules for monastic reform. • Single general chapter supervised their affairs, imposed regular visits upon their houses. • Financial stability • Increased membership from the 1480s • Lively intellectual life – fervour. • Many monks attend university, particularly Oxford. • Individual reformers: • Bishop Christoph von Utenheim • Humanist scholarship & DevotioModerna to promote reform of Church’s liturgy in Switzerland. • Collaborated with other reforming Churchmen: • Jacob Wimpfeling (humanist author) • Johannes Geiler von Kayserberg (preacher from Strasbourg). • New form of sermon/service: prône. European renewal:
Context: hope for the future & the Renaissance. • One of the most important Humanist scholars. • European-wide scope: • All of Europe was desperate to claim him as their property: • Spanish Church may overtures to get him to Spain • Bishop of Cracow, PietrTomicki • Remarkable stream of letters across the continent exchange ideas and friendship with many of the period’s great minds. • Early part of C16th at Oxford, friend to Thomas More & also many of the key figures who would begin England’s Reformation. • Embodies the contradictions of the late-medieval Church. • As a young man, inspired by the DevotioModerna. • Briefly enters an Augustinian monastery at Steyn. • Hated it, and became convinced that it was wasteful: • Believed that the austerity and learning of that brand of introspective piety should be unleashed in the world rather than remaining a cloistered ideal. Erasmus:
Applied his learning – particularly his mastery of languages – to biblical texts. • Back to the source: • Greek – opened up the learning of the Church Fathers. • The New Testament: • Would inspire many Protestants – which horrified Erasmus – largely because his Latin translations superseded the traditional Vulgate Bible, making the sense clearer. • TO ATTACK JEROME WAS TO ATTACK THE WESTERN CHURCH, BECAUSE HIS BIBLE FOUNDATION OF MUCH OF WHAT THAT CHURCH TOOK FOR GRANTED. • Key translations with regard to the Gospels. • John the Baptist cries out in the wilderness ‘metanoeite’: • Jerome, translated as ‘poenitentiam’ – ‘do penance’. • Basis of medieval Church’s doctrine of penance: • Fundamental part of Church as the mediator of grace, priestly power in granting absolution. • Erasmus – ‘metanoeite’ – ‘repent’. • i.e. come to your sense, repent. • Insular, individual, not action-based. • MUCH TURNED ON ONE WORD. Translation of the New Testament (1516)
Raises questions about the Cult of the Virgin Mary: • Wellspring of devotion to her in period – pilgrimages, prayers, relics, etc. • On basis of handful of references to her in the bible. • Church expand through allegory • i.e. reading biblical texts indirectly. • Especially true of Old Testament texts (before Christ). • E.g. female personification of Wisdom in the Book of Sirach; beautiful bride in the Song of Songs. • Erasmus loathed this supporting of the cult of Mary through such flimsy evidence. • Thought that such allegories referred to Christ and the Church, not Mary. • Rewrote Angel Gabriel’s greeting to Mary: • Foundation of the Hail Mary • ‘gratiosa’ (‘gracious’) rather than ‘gratia plena’ (‘full of grace’ – that is, full of the merits of God and therefore a medium). • Problematized Mary as a prop for devotion and for Good Works, & therefore many of the Church’s activities in procuring salvation. • Loathed the materiality of the Church’s rites: • Went on to satirise pilgrimages to English shrines to Mary at Walsingham and Canterbury in his Colloquies. • Loathed much of the physicality and tactility of catholic devotion, seemed to be a religion of the flesh, not the spirit. • Enchiridion MilitisChristiani (‘Dagger for a Christian Soldier’). • Approach God in a different way. • Knowledge of God to reign in all – pure knowledge of God would reform the body, living a contemplative life inspiried by Christ. • Outward ceremony and ritual replaced with quiet and persistent contemplation on the life of Christ. Erasmus
Mary’s ‘Virginity’: • Jerome had based on a reading of Ezekiel 44:2: • Shutting of the gate which only the Lord could enter • Erasmus could not read texts which supported Mary’s perpetual virginity as Jerome had done. • ‘We believe in the perpetual virginity of Mary, although it is not exclaimed in the sacred books’. • Some matters of importance had to be taken ‘ad fontes’ (in faith), because the Church said that they were true, not in bible: • Key problem for Ref: did the bible contain all truth? • Difference between him and Prots – ‘no’, ‘yes’. • Not a prequel. • Embodied the Church’s ambiguities: • For all his criticisms of the Church as an institution, and its practices, he was heavily reliant upon it for his livelihood. • Happy to accept patronage from bishops and those who directly profited from the practices he debunked • Archbishop of Canterbury, William Warham, provided pension • Money in question should have sustained pastoral duties in Aldington, Kent • Town which produced Elizabeth Barton, the Maid of Kent – ecstatic visions became source of revenue. • Even during the reformation when Warham replaced as Archbishop of Canterbury by Thomas Cranmer, Erasmus concerned that his pension kept coming. Erasmus – a prequel to the Reformation?
Here was a man who was intensely pious, considered himself a Catholic, but was content to criticise the Church to which he belonged severely: • That he saw Christianity differently from many people was a sign not of its fundamental ruptures, but of its fecundity. • Of its ability to house many different types of Christian. • And, for all he shared revulsion at many of the Church’s practices, loathed Reformers. • Huge debates – especially Luther, on Free Will and Faith Alone. Erasmus:
Three key points: • Distinction between the existence of criticism and a nation simmering with revolutionary discontent. • Standards by which we hold the clergy are often teleological • Ritual and sacrament; pastors and pillars of the community • Not preachers. • Church that was trying to renew itself – not moribund and static; but vibrant and evolving. • But, if not anticlericalism, then what? Concluding Thoughts: