1 / 45

The Supernova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)

The Supernova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP). Presentation to the Experimental Program Advisory Committee at SLAC. November 14, 2003. SLAC Involvement in SNAP.

joyce
Download Presentation

The Supernova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Supernova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Presentation to the Experimental Program Advisory Committee at SLAC. November 14, 2003 SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  2. SLAC Involvement in SNAP • With the creation of the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (KIPAC), experiments addressing issues at the interface between particle physics and astrophysics will play an increasingly prominent role in the SLAC research program. • Of particular interest will be the “dark sector”, the nature of dark energy and dark matter, and the roles they play in the evolution of the Universe. • Technology development in connection with the SNAP mission has been a cornerstone of the DOE-OS program addressing the mystery of dark energy. • We believe that SLAC can and should play a prominent and important role in this mission if it goes forward as currently planned. SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  3. SLAC Involvement in SNAP • The first discussions about SLAC involvement with the leadership of the SNAP collaboration (S. Perlmutter, M. Levi) were held in February 2003. • At that time, a potential hardware role in the mission associated with the design and development of the Observatory Control Unit (OCU) was identified. • We also highlighted our science interest in the use of SNAP data for strong lensing investigations. • A letter of application for institutional membership in the SNAP collaboration on behalf of Stanford and SLAC was submitted in August 2003. That application is currently still under discussion, but the preliminary responses have been very positive. SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  4. Outline of Presentations • The Science of Dark Energy and the Design of the SNAP Mission – E. Linder • Strong Lensing Investigations with SNAP – R. Blandford • The Observatory Control Unit – M. Huffer • Concluding Comments – S. Kahn SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  5. National priorities HEPAP: Scientic potential and facility need – absolutely central Secretary of Energy (11/10/03) – SNAP has very high priority (#3 on list) SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  6. SLAC and SNAP SLAC/Stanford major strengths include: • Strong Gravitational Lensing – Blandford Dark matter / dark energy / cosmology SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  7. SLAC and SNAP Observatory control unit expertise – Huffer Technical experience and development resources SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  8. SLAC and SNAP SLAC/Stanford major strengths include: • Space mission experience – Kahn Extensive design and implementation Knowledge of NASA culture • Experience with joint NASA-DOE projects from GLAST Collaborative agency working relationships • Dark Energy and High Energy Physics – Existing and ongoing SNAP theory collaboration by Kallosh & Linde SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  9. Revolutions in Physics Lord Kelvin (1900): Two clouds on the horizon The horizon is 95% cloudy! SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  10. Mapping our history The subtle slowing down and speeding up of the expansion, of distances with time: a(t), maps out cosmic history like tree rings map out the Earth’s climate history. SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  11. Accelerating universe SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  12. What is dark energy? Dark energy Matter Today Size=2 Size=1/4 Size=1/2 Size=4 • 70-75% of the energy density of the universe • Accelerating the expansion, like inflation • Determining the fate of the universe But what is it?Einstein’s cosmological constant ? Problems: fine tuning and coincidence SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  13. Dark energy – discovery! accelerating decelerating  > 0 at 99% confidence SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  14. Next generation Supernova/Acceleration Probe: SNAP Dedicated dark energy probe SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  15. Mission design • ~2 m aperture telescope • Reach very distant SNe. • 1 degree mosaic camera, ½ billion pixels • Efficiently study large numbers of SNe. • 0.35 – 1.7 m spectrograph • Analyze in detail each SN. Dedicated instrument designed to repeatedly observe an area of sky. Essentially no moving parts. 3+ year operation for experiment (lifetime open ended). SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  16. Mission design Guider CCD’s HgCdTe BITE Spectrograph Photometry:half-billion pixel mosaic camera, high-resistivity, rad-tolerant p-type CCDs (0.35-1.0 mm) and, HgCdTe arrays (0.9-1.7 mm). Field of View Optical ( 36 CCD’s) = 0.34 sq. deg. Four filters on each 10.5mmpixel CCD detector Field of View IR (36 HgCdTe’s) = 0.34 sq. deg. One filter on each 18mmpixel HgCdTe detector SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  17. Mission design Input port Prism BK7 Slicer Prism CaF2 Vis Detector NIR detector • Integral field optical and IR spectroscopy: • 0.35-1.7 mm, • 3”x6” FOV, • low resolution, • high throughput. SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  18. Mission design HDF GOODS ~300 sq.deg. Wide Survey 15 sq.deg. Deep Survey • 9 filters • mAB=27.7 every 4 days • 120 epochs • coadd AB=30.3 (31) • 9 filters • mAB=28.1 SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  19. SN control of systematics Lightcurve & Peak Brightness Images M and L Dark Energy Properties Redshift & SN Properties Spectra data analysis physics Each supernova sends a rich stream of information about its physical state. SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  20. High energy physics SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  21. Complementarity Next generation data will map the acceleration of the universe so precisely that it can probe: • The nature of dark energy w(z) • Structure of the vacuum • w´(z)  V´ / V() • High energy physics SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  22. Fate of the universe a wa=2w´ t w0 First and simplest DE model: linear potential (Linde 1986) leads to collapsing universe. Such models look like  in the past, but develop a strong w´. tdoom=  () tdoom > 29 Gyr [95% SNAP] tdoom > 35 Gyr [95%SNAP+CMB] tdoom > 40 Gyr [95% SN+CMB+WL] Kallosh, Kratochvil, Linde, Linder, & Shmakova JCAP 2003; astro-ph/0307185 SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  23. SNAP Cosmology and Physics Weak Lensing SN Ia SN II Strong Lensing • Wide, Deep and Colorful • 9000 times the area of Hubble Deep Field • 10 billion years of detailed history • 108 galaxies, 105 lenses, 9 wavelength bands SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  24. Strong Lensing Program • Multiple imaging by galaxies, groups and clusters • Ancillary program - complementary to: • Supernova cosmography • Weak lensing study of large scale structure • Galaxy-galaxy lensing study of galaxy halos • Telescope nearly ideal for strong lensing because of • 9 filters • 0.1(0.05)” pixels • 4 day cadence • Deep (15 sq deg) and Wide (300 sq deg) surveys • Lensing rate 0.001-0.002 =>~300,000 “events” • Quantitative, identification pipeline (cf CLASS) • Emphasize standard elliptical galaxy “scattering” with 0.5<z<1 • Complementary to LSST and Square Kilometer Array SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  25. Scientific Goals • Source Population • Study the faintest galaxies – building blocks of normal galaxies • redshift distribution • luminosities • star formation rates etc • AGN microlensing • Rare high magnification events • Lens Population • Galaxy substructure out to R ~ 10kpc • Cluster substructure • Cosmography • Propagation Effects • Time delays Þ small scale dark matter distribution • Quasar absorption lines etc SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  26. Source Population • Understand empirically where when and how small galaxies merge to form larger galaxies • ~2 x 105 isolated elliptical galaxy lenses on deep field • total cross section ~ 0.02 sq deg • 10000 (30000) clean lenses on deep field to IAB ~ 28 (30) • Use lens colors to measure lens distance • Use color maps to separate source from lens, remove dust • Use Einstein ring radius to measure source distance • 100 times too faint for spectroscopy • Infer source properties statistically and test CDM theory SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  27. Simulation • Massive elliptical lens, I=21.5, at zd=0.7 • Faint blue galaxy, B=29, at higher redshift • Fit 9 images with two “spectral” models to reconstruct lensed source • Infer zs from Einstein ring radius • Input images (true color, different intensity scales!): SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  28. Simulation Simulated SNAP images: • 0.12” pixels, 0.14” FWHM PSF, no dither • Deep survey, 1.5 mag fainter than HDF • B, V and I-bands shown for illustration: B (440nm) V (582nm) I (770nm) SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  29. Simulation Optimal weighting of 9 filters' images allows lens and source components to be separated SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  30. Simulation Measuring source redshift with: • Einstein ring radius to ±1/4 pixel • Lens photo-z to ±0.02 • Lens velocity dispersion to ±10 km s-1 => Find 1.2 < zs < 1.5 (1) (true value = 1.3) Lensing provides vital additional information to photo-z at high redshift SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  31. Scientific Goals • Source Population • Study the faintest galaxies – building blocks of normal galaxies • redshift distribution • luminosities • star formation rates etc • AGN microlensing • Rare high magnification events • Lens Population • Galaxy substructure out to R ~ 10kpc • Cluster substructure • Cosmography • Propagation Effects • Time delays => small scale dark matter distribution • Quasar absorption lines etc SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  32. Cluster Arc Images Multi-colour, high resolution surveying and imaging: RCS0224 (CFHT): Cl0024 (HST): SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  33. Scientific Goals • Source Population • Study the faintest galaxies – building blocks of normal galaxies • redshift distribution • luminosities • star formation rates etc • AGN microlensing • Rare high magnification events • Lens Population • Galaxy substructure out to R ~ 10kpc • Cluster substructure • Cosmography • Propagation Effects • Time delays => small scale dark matter distribution • Quasar absorption lines etc SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  34. Time delays • Lens time delays measure the Hubble constant, age of universe • Accuracy limited by lens model • Currently lens determinations are competitive with traditional astronomical methods • By the time SNAP is launched this will probably be settled • Small scale structure along the line of sight causes deviation from apparent pure Hubble expansion • Can measure statistically and check CDM predictions SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  35. B1608+656 delays Time delays of 1-2 months, measured to precision of 1-2 days... H0 = 75±6 km s-1 Mpc SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  36. Research underway and planned • Simulations using Hubble images and projected SNAP resolution (including dithering) and sky/detector noise (Marshall) • Establish procedure for data analysis pipeline to find clean and dirty lenses • Establish procedure for refining elliptical potentials • Use Hubble Ultradeep Field to describe source population • Estimate accuracy for determining source properties • Work with weak lensing group to develop strategy to combine strong and weak lensing studies of galaxy structure (Koopmans) • Study rare, higher order catastrophes as (Baltz): • highly magnifying telescopes • probes of granularity of dark matter • surveying instruments SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  37. What instrument deliverable does SLAC propose? • The Observatory Control Unit (OCU) • Both a hardware (electronics) and software system • Supervises and manages (on-station) observatory operation SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  38. Electrical Block Diagram OCU Primary ACS Filter Wheel Ka xmt Primary S-band Transponder Primary Shutter Focal Plane Assembly Mass store Primary CD&H Focus 200 GBytes OCU Redundant Mass store Redundant Thermal S-band Transponder Redundant Spectrograph Power Ka xmt Redundant Power After H. Heetderks 1553 Bus SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  39. Functional requirements • Executes instrument’s observation plan • Transfer pointing requests to ACS • Controls CCD array parameterization and readout • Science data management • Manage mass store • Route real-time and stored data to downlink transmitters • Mechanism management, control, and operation • Telescope cover, optical shutter, stepper coils, etc… • Power distribution and management SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  40. Functional requirements… • Thermal management • Manage heater elements • Primary, Secondary mirrors, telescope structure, etc… • Survival heaters • Monitor and trend temperatures • Housekeeping • Monitor instrument environment • Packetize and route as telemetry • Data (Event) readout and acquisition • Command processing and distribution • Command database definition and maintenance • Decoding, distribution, and execution SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  41. What is the scope of the OCU within the observatory? • OCU performs electronic supervision of entire instrument • Encompasses design, specification and implementation of… • The bulk of instrument’s digital electronics • A modest amount of analog electronics • The entire Flight Software System • Executes the science mission … • Natural consequence is significant role in defining…. • instrument architecture • translation of science objectives to operational program SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  42. How does it fit within SLAC’s current program? • OCU development requires a unique blend of skills… • Data Acquisition • Detector Monitoring and Control • SLAC has extensive experience in these areas… • Successful, lead role within 2 major HEP experiments: • SLD • BaBar • SLAC has space heritage… • Lead role in both Electronics and Flight Software for GLAST • Demonstrated collaboration with NASA based labs • SLAC has long history of successful collaboration with LBL • We enjoy a physical proximity… • Phases well with GLAST and BaBar program • BaBar no longer in development • GLAST moving out of design/development stage SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  43. Concluding Comments • In October 2003, NASA and DOE announced the results of a year-long discussion regarding the possibility for cooperation in a space-based mission devoted to exploring the nature of dark energy. • The plan involves the development of a Joint Dark Energy Mission (JDEM). • NASA/DOE will issue a single AO soliciting a dark energy science investigation requiring a space-based observatory. The science investigation will be PI-led and will be selected via open competition. • The present schedule shows selection of the science investigation one year after the onset of new funding, leading to launch of the mission eight years later. SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  44. Organization of JDEM SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

  45. Concluding Comments • The proposed plan is for the SLAC team to participate in an LBNL-led proposal for a JDEM science investigation based on the SNAP concept. • SLAC and LBNL have a long history of close cooperation in high energy physics experiments. • The differences in culture between the NASA and DOE communities will introduce some challenges in making the JDEM concept work. • SLAC’s extensive experience working with both agencies in the GLAST program should prove to be a key asset to the SNAP collaboration. SLAC EPAC Meeting Nov. 14-15, 2003

More Related