110 likes | 153 Views
This study explores the impact of visual stimuli on sound location perception, specifically investigating the Ventriloquism Effect and Ventriloquism Aftereffect across species and reference frames. By examining auditory saccade accuracy pre- and post-adaptation to visual shifts, the research sheds light on the mixture of head- and eye-centered reference frames. Results show spatially aligned AV-stimuli still influence auditory responses, expanding the auditory spatial map beyond the trained area. Collaborators from Duke University, NTT Tokio, and Boston University contributed to this insightful cross-species analysis.
E N D
Visual Adaptation And Spatial Auditory Processing Peter Lokša, Norbert Kopčo Collaborators:Jenni Groh, Barb Shinn-Cunningham, I-Fan Lin
Way to go • Red Sox! • Way to go • Red Sox! Introduction • Visual stimuli can affect the perception of sound location • e.g. the Ventriloquism Effect • e.g. the Ventriloquism Afterffect • But does effect persist? • But does effect persist? • - barn owls: prism adaptation (Knudsen et al.) • - monkeys: “ventriloquism aftereffect” (Woods and • Recanzone, Curr. Biol. 2004)
What is reference frame • What is the • reference frame? • Eye-centered? • ? • ? • Oculomotor? • Head (ear) -centered?
Methods • Basic idea: • 1. Pre-adaptation baseline: Measure auditory saccade accuracy • 2. Adaptation phase: Present combined visual-auditory stimuli, with visual location shifted • 3. Compare auditory saccade accuracy pre- and post-adaptation
Expected behavior • Magnitude (°) • Stimulus Location (°) Method: center • Fix head to face 0° • Induce shift: • - in only one region of space • - from a single fixation point • Test to see if shift generalizes • to the same sub-region in: • - head-centered space • - eye-centered space • Experiment divided into • 1-hour blocks: • (12 for humans, 16 for monkeys) • Within a block, 3 types of • randomly interleaved trials: • - Training AV stim: 50% • - Test A-only stimuli: 50% (25% from trained, 25% shifted FP) • Audiovisual display • Speakers • LEDs • FP
Follow-up • Are results independent of where ventriloquism is introduced? • - Spatial auditory resolution is lower in the periphery • - Maier et al. 2009 – binaural cue adaptation only in center • Eye-centered? • ? • ? • Oculomotor? • Head (ear) -centered?
Method: periphery • Fix head to face 0° • Induce shift: • - in only one region of space • - from a single fixation point • Test to see if shift generalizes • to the same sub-region in: • - head-centered space • - eye-centered space • Experiment divided into • 1-hour blocks: • (12 for humans, 16 for monkeys) • Within a block, 3 types of • randomly interleaved trials: • - Training AV stim: 50% • - Test A-only stimuli: 50% (25% from trained, 25% shifted FP) • Expected behavior • Audiovisual display • Speakers • Magnitude (°) • LEDs • FP • Stimulus Location (°)
Results: AV-aligned Baseline • Humnas: • Monkeys:
Summary • The main results are consistent across species and regions: • it’s possible to locally introduce ventriloquism aftereffect • the reference frame is a mixture between head- and eye-centered • But • Visual stimuli influence saccade responses to auditory stimuli even when the AV-stimuli are spatially aligned: • Expanding the auditory spatial map outside the trained area • In an head-centered way when AV training is in center • In a way that is modulated by eye-centered representation when AV training is in periphery
Collaborators • Jenni Groh, Duke University • I-Fan Lin, NTT Tokio • Barb Shinn-Cunningham, BU