120 likes | 197 Views
What Happens Now? From a Local Election Administrator’s Viewpoint. STATES Population Number of counties Elected or appointed election officials Number of SOS staff Budget $$$ Testing/Certification process Statutory authority. COUNTIES/CITIES Population Number of FT staff Budget $$$
E N D
What Happens Now?From a Local Election Administrator’s Viewpoint
STATES Population Number of counties Elected or appointed election officials Number of SOS staff Budget $$$ Testing/Certification process Statutory authority COUNTIES/CITIES Population Number of FT staff Budget $$$ Other responsibilities Availability of IT support Reliance on vendors State and County/CityDifferences
How do we know what is certified? How do we know how it was tested? How do we know that what we received at our office is the certified version? Should we perform our own testing? If so, what should we test, and how? How can we best secure/safeguard the system? How do we stay informed, i.e. new version releases? How can we best educate our voters and our elected officials?
How do we know what is certified? • Vendors need to routinely notify their customers of current certified software and hardware. • Vendors need to communicate information regarding new version releases. • States need to maintain a listing of all state certified systems, including specific software/hardware components. • EAC needs to maintain a repository of information relating to all voting systems.
How do we know how it was tested? • Keep it Simple!! • Standard operating procedures should include distribution of all test lab operating procedures and test lab reports. • Vendor’s request for state certification should routinely include distribution of these reports. • State certification procedures/results should be communicated to local election administrators.
How do we know that what wereceived is the certified version? • At a minimum new version releases should routinely be distributed by testing labs directly to the state and/or counties.
Should we perform our own testing? • First, we need to know exactly how the “system” was tested. • Then we can determine if additional testing is necessary. • Counties should routinely conduct an entire system test following installation of new software/hardware components. • Counties need access to best practices and procedures for conducting these tests.
How can we bestsecure/safeguard the system? • Keep it simple. • Include operating procedures, i.e. tamper-resistant transfer cases, etc. • Provide solutions to technology concerns. • Share best practices and procedures. • Partner with us to protect democracy.
How do we stay informed? Communicate, Communicate, Communicate • Vendors to EAC, States, and Counties • EAC to States and Counties • States to individual Counties and state elected officials • Local counties to their elected governing body, to their staff, and to their voters
How can we educate voters andelected officials? • Conduct office tours during election mode. • Distribute informational brochures. • Partner with League of Women Voters, area Chambers of Commerce, etc. • Issue press releases announcing important events, i.e. Logic and Accuracy testing. • Encourage public observation of the process.
Working Together Builds Success and Most Importantly - Trust Continue to get better by building partnerships • Vendors • Information Technology experts • Testing laboratories • EAC • States • Local Election Administrator • Shared information, resources, best practices