130 likes | 361 Views
Why build a toolkit for VTE Prevention?. VTE is a common source of inpatient M
E N D
1. Guide Available for Deep Vein Thrombosis Developed from Partnerships in Implementing Patient Safety program toolkit
Based on quality improvement initiatives undertaken at the University of California, San Diego Medical Center and Emory University Hospitals
Assists quality improvement practitioners in preventing one of the most important problems facing hospitalized patients - DVT / PE (VTE)
2. Why build a toolkit for VTE Prevention? VTE is a common source of inpatient M&M
Jumbo jet crash / day- > Breast CA, HIV, MVA combined
May be # 1 preventable source of hospital death
Effective and safe methods of prevention exist
Large “implementation gap” - best practice ? current practice
These methods are grossly underutilized
Awareness, difficulty implementing, no validated risk assessment
P4P, public reporting, and core measures
3. To Achieve Improvement Real institutional support / prioritization
Will to standardize
Physician leadership
Measurement of process / outcomes
Protocol, integrated into order sets
Education
Continued refinement / tweaking- PDSA
4. Hierarchy of Reliability No protocol* (“State of Nature”)
Decision support exists but not linked to order writing, or prompts within orders but no decision support
Protocol well-integrated
(into orders at point-of-care)
Protocol enhanced
(by other QI / high reliability strategies)
Oversights identified and addressed in real time
5. The Essential First Intervention
1) a standardized VTE risk assessment, linked to…
2) a menu of appropriate prophylaxis options, plus…
3) a list of contraindications to pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis
Challenges:
Make it easy to use (“automatic”)
Make sure it captures almost all patients
Trade-off between guidance and ease of use / efficiency
6. Low Medium High
7. Map to Reach Level 3Implementing an Effective VTE Prevention Protocol Examine existing admit, transfer, periop order sets with reference to VTE prophylaxis.
Design a protocol-driven DVT prophylaxis order set (w/ integrated risk assessment)
Vette / Pilot – PDSA
Educate / consensus building
Place new standardized DVT order set ‘module’ into all pertinent admit, transfer, periop order sets.
Monitor, tweak - PDSA
10. Hierarchy of Reliability No protocol* (“State of Nature”)
Decision support exists but not linked to order writing, or prompts within orders but no decision support
Protocol well-integrated
(into orders at point-of-care)
Protocol enhanced
(by other QI / high reliability strategies)
Oversights identified and addressed in real time Ideally, we’d find a way to check on all best practice performance in real time, and correct it before patient went on to next stage. Ideally, we’d find a way to check on all best practice performance in real time, and correct it before patient went on to next stage.
11. Map to Reach Level 595+ % prophylaxis Use MAR or Automated Reports to Classify all patients on the Unit as being in one of three zones:
GREEN ZONE - on anticoagulation
YELLOW ZONE - on mechanical prophylaxis only
RED ZONE – on no prophylaxis
Act to move patients out of the RED!
12. Situational Awareness and Measure-vention: Getting to Level 5 Identify patients on no anticoagulation
Empower nurses to place SCDs in patients on no prophylaxis as standing order (if no contraindications)
Contact MD if no anticoagulant in place and no obvious contraindication
Templated note, text page, etc
Need Administration to back up these interventions and make it clear that docs can not “shoot the messenger”
13. Collaborative Efforts and Kudos SHM VTE Prevention Collaborative I - 25 sites
SHM / VA Pilot Group - 6 sites
SHM / Cerner Pilot Group – 6 sites
AHRQ / QIO (NY, IL, IA) - 60 sites
IHI Expedition to Prevent VTE – 60 sites
SHM Team Improvement Award
NAPH Safety Net Award
Venous Disease Coalition