120 likes | 276 Views
Preliminary Heat Shield Design for nEDM. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08. Heat Shield Design Choices. Meets Physics requirement for experiment Limits heat load to inner volumes Reliable design; no leaks or failures Manufacturability, Serviceability and Cost Support scheme that addresses movement
E N D
Preliminary Heat Shield Design for nEDM Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08
Heat Shield Design Choices • Meets Physics requirement for experiment • Limits heat load to inner volumes • Reliable design; no leaks or failures • Manufacturability, Serviceability and Cost • Support scheme that addresses movement • Number of heat shield and temperatures • LN2 shield or not • Cool down requirements
Heat Shield Material Choices • OFHC copper for outermost shield if it meets experiment requirements (MIT recommendation) • Aluminum alloy for inner shields only if required • Support scheme and materials that limit heat load • Copy support designs from SRF community
OFHC Copper as heat shield • Proven in most SRF cavities worldwide. Jlab, SNS, Cern, and Desy • Does it meet Physics requirements ??? • Braze with Sil-fos or other lower temperature alloy • Lower CTE than Aluminum Alloys • Very reliable • Thermal Conductivity Copper vs. Aluminum At 40K, 5 times better ( 2000 W/ cm-K) At 80K, 2 times better ( 600 W/cm-K)
Aluminum Heat ShieldsMaterial Comparison Aluminum 1100 Aluminum, Al >=99% Beryllium, Be <= 0.000800 % Copper, Cu <= 0.05 % Manganese, Mn <= 0.05% Other, each <= 0.0500 % Other, total <= 0.150 % Silicon, Si <= 0.95 % Zinc, Zn <= 0.10 % Aluminum 5083 Aluminum, Al 92.4 - 95.6 % Chromium, Cr 0.0500 - 0.250 % Copper, Cu <= 0.100 % Iron, Fe <= 0.400 % Magnesium, Mg 4.00 - 4.90 % Manganese, Mn 0.400 - 1.00 % Other, each <= 0.0500 % Other, total <= 0.150 % Silicon, Si <= 0.400 % Titanium, Ti <= 0.150 % Zinc, Zn <= 0.250 % Aluminum 6061 Aluminum, Al 95.8 - 98.6 % Chromium, Cr 0.0400 - 0.350 % Copper, Cu 0.150 - 0.400 % Iron, Fe <= 0.700 % Magnesium, Mg 0.800 - 1.20 % Manganese, Mn <= 0.150 % Other, each <= 0.0500 % Other, total <= 0.150 % Silicon, Si 0.400 - 0.800 % Titanium, Ti <= 0.150 % Zinc, Zn <= 0.250 % Aluminum 3003 Aluminum, Al 96.7 - 99.0 % Copper, Cu 0.0500 - 0.200 % Iron, Fe <= 0.700 % Manganese, Mn 1.00 - 1.50 % Other, each <= 0.0500 % Other, total <= 0.150 % Silicon, Si <= 0.600 % Zinc, Zn <= 0.100 %
Aluminum Fabrication Issues • Need to narrow alloy choices for fabrication tests • Try all in small 1 foot square tests • Try different tubing attachment processes Clamp (Poor thermal contact) MIG or TIG weld (hard) Braze (vacuum braze) 1100 Aluminum best choice
Heat Shield Design Parameters Outer Cryostat - 6061 Aluminum, emissivity = .2 50K shield - OFHC Copper emissivity = .07(polished copper) 3 mm thick (.118) 22.2 mm tubing (1.0 mm thick) Initial design 40 Square meters 1000 kg. 4.5K shield - 1100 aluminum with brazed tubing 9.5 mm thick 400 kg .3-.5K Central Volume – Composite emissivity = 1.00 Vacuum better than 5 x 10e-5 torr Double Aluminized Mylar (DAM) 25 microns Polyester 75 micron spacer Emissivity = .035
Summary • Use proven designs as guidance, Mostly Jlab • Suggest use of OFHC copper outer shield • Use 1100 Aluminum where necessary Tasks to complete concepual design • Finish hand calculations (June 08) Not ready to release today • Do FEA on heat transfer and structure (June-July) • Work with Jan on supports (thermal and mechanical)