150 likes | 424 Views
HOT in the City: Higher Order Thinking Through Math Discourse William Conroy, Sue Burbank, Paige Calhoun, Jo McHugh & Meg Borowski, Hartford Public Schools Mary Truxaw & Megan Staples, UConn ATOMIC Conference Mohegan Sun, Uncasville, CT November 30, 2009.
E N D
HOT in the City: Higher Order Thinking Through Math Discourse William Conroy, Sue Burbank, Paige Calhoun, Jo McHugh & Meg Borowski, Hartford Public Schools Mary Truxaw & Megan Staples, UConnATOMIC ConferenceMohegan Sun, Uncasville, CTNovember 30, 2009
UConn-Hartford Math ACCESS ProjectAcademic Content & Communication Equals Student Success
Students’ Success in Mathematics and Success on Mathematics Assessments A Mathematics Learning Discourse
2008-2009: Math ACCESS Project • Funding from State Dept. of Higher Education Teacher Quality Partnership Grant • 45 hours PD & ongoing collaborative work with ~23 teachers from 4 Hartford Schools • Bulkeley High School • Batchelder School • Kennelly School • Watkinson School
Batchelder ACCESS Teachers Honorary Batchelder Teacher
Math ACCESS Project: Ongoing Work • Ongoing work – bi-weekly lesson study meetings • Teams of teachers & interns design, implement, and debrief HOT lessons • UConn Interns & Math Educators support work • Archive of HOT lessons designed and taught by Hartford teachers and Interns. • UConn’s Center for Research in Math Education provides webspace & technical expertise for archiving the lesson plans: http://www.crme.uconn.edu/lessons/ • CDs and school binder compiled by Interns
Mathematics Learning Discourse • Although most math lessons include communication—for example, reading, writing, and talking—not all communication necessarily supports mathematics learning discourse.
H.O.T. Discourse • Higher Order Thinking: • For discourse to be H.O.T., there must be opportunities for cognitive challenges that promote higher order thinking • There must be linguistic support for these the cognitive challenges.
Language Objectives -SIOP Along with an emphasis on higher order thinking, a key feature of the HOT lessons is the explicit inclusion of language objectives. • Categories of language objectives: • Key vocabulary • Language functions (ways language used) • Language skills • Grammar or language structures • Lesson tasks • Language Learning Strategies Category used most frequently in math classes. (We try to do more than this.) EchevarrÍa, Vogt, and Short (2007) Making Content Comprehensible for English Learners: The SIOP Model
Academic Language in Practice • Language objectives—for example: • SWBAT express the likelihood of an event using everyday language • Sentence frames—for example: • I think _____ is correct because _____. • Language arts strategies—for example: • Graphic organizers, time/sequence words, etc. • Attend to student explanations—for example: • Talk moves, asking HOT questions, etc. • etc.