1 / 43

Support Department Cost Allocation

Support Department Cost Allocation. CHAPTER. Objectives. 1. Describe the difference between support departments and producing departments. 2. Calculate single and multiple changing rates for a support department.

kane-christensen
Download Presentation

Support Department Cost Allocation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Support Department Cost Allocation CHAPTER

  2. Objectives 1. Describe the difference between support departments and producing departments. 2. Calculate single and multiple changing rates for a support department. 3. Allocate support-department costs to producing departments using the direct, sequential, and reciprocal methods. 4. Calculate departmental overhead rates. After studying this chapter, you should be able to:

  3. Types of Departments Producing departments secara langsung bertanggung jawab pada pembuatan produk atau jasa yang dijual kepelanggan

  4. Types of Departments Supporting departments menyediakan pelayanan pendukung yang diperlukan oleh departemen produksi Pemeliharaan, pertamanan, permesinan, rumah tangga, personalia dan penyimpanan

  5. Langkah-langkah dalam pengalokasian biaya dept pendukung ke dept produksi 1. Membagi perusahaan kedalam departemen-depatemen 2. Mengklasifikasikan tiap departemen sebagai pendukung atau departemen produksi 3. Menelusuri semua biaya overhead perusahaan di departemen pendukung atau departemen produksi 4. Mengalokasikan biaya dept pendukung ke dept produksi Continued

  6. Langkah-langkah dalam pengalokasian biaya dept pendukung ke dept produksi 5. Menghitung tarif overhead yang ditentukan terlebih dahulu untuk departemen produksi 6. Mengalokasikan biaya overhead ke tiap unit produk melalui tarif overhead yang ditentukan terlebih dahulu

  7. Examples of Cost Drivers forSupport Departments Support Department Possible Driver Accounting Number of transactions Cafeteria Number of employees Engineering Number of change orders Maintenance Machine hours; maintenance hours Payroll Number of employees Personnel Number of employees, firings, layoffs, new hires

  8. Tujuan Alokasi • 1. Memperoleh harga yang wajar dan saling menguntungkan • 2. Menghitung tngkat laba lini produk • 3. Memperkirakan pengaruh ekonomi dari perencanan dan pengendalian • 4. Menilai persediaan • 5. Memotivasi para manajer

  9. Note Objective 5: Allocations can be used to motivate managers.

  10. AND Barry Hamilton Fixed costs……………… $26,190 Variable costs….. $0.023 per page

  11. Variable cost: 270,000 x $0.023 $ 6,210 Fixed cost 26,190 Total cost for 270,000 pages $32,400 A Single Charge Rate • Estimated usage (in pages) by the three producing departments is as follows: • Audit Department 94,500 • Tax Department 67,500 • MAS Department 108,000 • Total 270,000 Barry Hamilton Average cost ($32,400 ÷ 270,000) $0.12 per page

  12. A Single Charge Rate Total Photocopying Department Charge Number of Pages Charge per Page Total Charges x = Audit Department 92,000 $0.12 $11,040 Tax Department 65,000 0.12 7,800 MAS Department 115,000 0.12 13,800 Total 272,000 $32,640

  13. Multiple Charging Rates Amount Allocated to Each Department Peak Number of Pages Proportion of Peak Usage Total Fixed Costs Audit 7,875 0.20 $26,190 $ 5,238 Tax 22,500 0.57 26,190 14,928 MAS 9,000 0.23 26,190 6,024 Total 39,375 $26,190

  14. Multiple Charging Rates Number of Pages x $0.023 Fixed Cost Allocation Total Charges + = Audit department $2,116 $ 5,238 $ 7,354 Tax department 1,495 14,928 16,423 MAS department 2,645 6,024 8,669 Total $6,256 $26,190 $32,446

  15. Budgeted Versus Actual Usage • Ketika kita kita mengalokasikan biaya dept pendukung kedept produksi, seharusnya kita mengalokasikan biaya aktual atau biaya yang dianggarkan?

  16. Budgeted Versus Actual Usage Biaya yang dianggarkan

  17. Budgeted Versus Actual Usage Prinsip umum evaluasi kinerja adalah para menajer seharusnya tidak bertanggung jawab atas biaya atau aktivitas yang tidak dikendalikan oleh mereka

  18. Use of Budgeted Data for Product Costing Total Rate Allocated Charges Number of Copies x = Audit Department 94,500 $0.12 $11,340 Tax Department 67,500 0.12 8,100 MAS Department 108,000 0.12 12,960 Total 270,000 $32,400

  19. Use of Actual Data for Performance Evaluation Purposes Total Rate Allocated Charges Number of Copies x = Audit department 92,000 $0.12 $11,040 Tax department 65,000 0.12 7,800 MAS department 115,000 0.12 13,800 Total 272,000 $32,640

  20. Memilih metode alokasi biaya departemen pendukung • Ada tiga metode untuk mengalokasikan biaya dept pendukung ke departemen produksi: • The Direct Method (metode alokasi langsung) • The Sequential Method (metode alokasi berurutan) • The Reciprocal Method (metode alokasi timbal balik)

  21. Data for Illustrating Allocation Methods • Support Departments Producing Departments • Direct costs* $250,000 $160,000 $100,000 $ 60,000 • Normal activity: • Kilowatt-hours ----- 200,000 600,000 200,000 • Maintenance hours 1,000 ----- 4,500 4,500 • *Pada dept produksi biaya langsung hanya berhubungan dengan biaya overhead yang secara langsung dapat ditelusuri ke dept tersebut Power Maintenance Grinding Assembly

  22. Maintenance Direct Method of Allocation Power Grinding Assembly

  23. Maintenance Grinding Direct Method of Allocation Power Assembly

  24. 0.75 600,000 (600,000 + 200,000) Power = 200,000 (600,000 + 200,000) 4,500 (4,500 + 4,500) 0.25 4,500 (4,500 + 4,500) Maintenance = 0.50 0.50 STEP 1—CALCULATE ALLOCATION RATIOS Grinding Assembly Direct Method

  25. STEP 2—ALLOCATE SUPPORTS DEPARTMENT COSTS USING THE ALLOCATION RATIOS Support Departments Producing Departments Power Maintenance Grading Assembly Direct costs $250,000 $160,000 $100,000 $ 60,000 Power -250,000 --- 187,500 62,500 Maintenance ----160,000 80,000 80,000 $ 0 $ 0 $367,500 $202,500 a b a 0.75 x $250,000 = $187,500; 0.25 x $250,000 = $62,500 0.50 x $160,000 = $80,000 b Direct Method

  26. 2 1 Power Maintenance Sequential Method of Allocation STEP 1: Rank service departments

  27. Sequential Method of Allocation STEP 2 Power Maintenance Grinding Assembly

  28. Sequential Method of Allocation STEP 2 Maintenance Grinding Assembly

  29. 600,000 (200,000 + 600,000 + 200,000) 0.60 STEP 1—CALCULATE ALLOCATION RATIOS Maint. Grinding Assembly 200,000 (200,000 + 600,000 + 200,000) 0.20 0.20 Power = Sequential Method

  30. Mainte- nance 4,500 (4,500 + 4,500) = 0.50 4,500 (4,500 + 4,500) 0.50 STEP 1—CALCULATE ALLOCATION RATIOS Maint. Grinding Assembly Sequential Method

  31. STEP 2—ALLOCATE SUPPORT DEPARTMENT COSTS USING THE ALLOCATION RATIOS Support Departments Producing Departments Power Maintenance Grading Assembly Direct costs $250,000 $160,000 $100,000 $ 60,000 Power -250,000 50,000 150,000 50,000 Maintenance ----210,000 105,000 105,000 $ 0 $ 0 $355,000 $215,000 a b a 0.20 x $250,000 = $50,000; 0.60 x $250,000 = $150,000; 0.20 x $250,000 = $50,000 0.50 x $210,000 = $105,000 b Sequential Method

  32. Reciprocal Method • Metode alokasi timbal balik mengakui semua interaksi antar departemen pendukung

  33. Reciprocal Method Support Departments Producing Departments Power Maintenance Grading Assembly Direct costs: Normal activity: Kilowatt-hours --- 200,000 600,000 200,000 Maintenance hours 1,000 --- 4,500 4,500 Proportion of Output Used by Departments Power Maintenance Grading Assembly Allocated ratios: Power --- 0.20 0.60 0.20 Maintenance 0.10 --- 0.45 0.45

  34. Reciprocal Method M = Direct costs + Share of Power’s costs M = $160,000 + $50,000 + 0.02M 0.98M = $210,000 M = $214,286

  35. P = Direct cost + Share of Maintenance’s cost = = $250,000 + $21,429 $271,429 P = $250,000 + 0.1($214,286) P P Reciprocal Method

  36. ALLOCATE SUPPORT DEPARTMENT COSTS USING THE ALLOCATION RATIOS AND THE SUPPORT-DEPARTMENT COSTS FROM RECIPROCAL METHODS EQUATIONS Support Departments Producing Departments Power Maintenance Grading Assembly Direct costs $250,000 $160,000 $100,000 $ 60,000 Power -271,429 54,286 162,857 54,286 Maintenance 271,429-214,286 96,429 96,429 Total $ 0 $ 0 $359,286 $210,715 from Slide 7-35 from Slide 7-34

  37. Comparison of Support Department Cost Allocations Using the Direct, Sequential, and Reciprocal Methods Direct Method Grinding Assembly Direct costs $100,000 $ 60,000 Allocated from power 187,500 62,500 Allocated from maintenance 80,000 80,000 Total cost $367,500 $202,500 Click on button to compare with sequential method Return to show Click on button to compare with reciprocal method

  38. Comparison of Support Department Cost Allocations Using the Direct, Sequential, and Reciprocal Methods Sequential Method Grinding Assembly Direct costs $100,000 $ 60,000 Allocated from power 150,000 50,000 Allocated from maintenance 105,000 105,000 Total cost $355,000 $215,000 Click on button to compare with direct method Return to show Click on button to compare with reciprocal method

  39. Comparison of Support Department Cost Allocations Using the Direct, Sequential, and Reciprocal Methods Reciprocal Method Grinding Assembly Direct costs $100,000 $ 60,000 Allocated from power 162,857 54,286 Allocated from maintenance 96,429 96,429 Total cost $359,286 $210,715 Click on button to compare with direct method Return to show Click on button to compare with sequential method

  40. Departmental Overhead Rates • The overhead rate for the grinding department is computed as follows (assuming the normal level of activity is 71,000 MH): • OH rate = $355,000  71,000 = $5 per MH • The overhead rate for the assembly department is computed as follows (assuming the normal level of activity is 107,500 DLH): • OH rate = $215,000  107,500 = $2 per DLH

  41. Overhead cost assigned: 2 x $5 $10 1 x $2 2 Total assigned $12 Product Unit Cost A product requires two machine hours of grinding per unit and one hour of assembly.

  42. Chapter Seven The End

More Related