230 likes | 346 Views
Product Cost Allocation. Rockynet.com, Inc. Boulder / Northern Exposure XBUS 6210 – Management Accounting and Control Systems March 26, 2005. Rockynet: communications services provider. Rockynet’s target market includes small to medium sized businesses. SERVICES Dedicated T1 circuits
E N D
Product Cost Allocation Rockynet.com, Inc. Boulder / Northern Exposure XBUS 6210 – Management Accounting and Control Systems March 26, 2005
Rockynet: communications services provider Rockynet’s target market includes small to medium sized businesses. SERVICES Dedicated T1 circuits Lit-buildings or “TNet” Co-location facilities VoIP telephone service Managed servers Web hosting Equipment sales Technical consulting services 85% of Revenues Focus of Analysis
Network Architecture • Denver POP • T3 circuits to Saavis, MCI & Internap • 100-BaseT ethernet to Cogent • 1000-BaseFX fiber to Yipes Boulder POP Connects to Denver POP via two T3 circuits from different providers.
Description of data services • Dedicated T1 circuits • connections that are not shared • provide all capacity and speed available to a customer • A premium product • Lit buildings (TNET) • buildings or commercial campuses where tenants lease space • tenants share one or more T1s • Cost effective tenant-level support and service • Co-location facilities • specialized for housing servers and providing internet connectivity • allows customers to locate servers in a controlled environment • provides T1 and T3 circuits and backup power is available • Specialized state-of-art facilities
Voice service introduced in 2002 VoIP (Voice Over Internet Protocol) delivers voice lines over data lines • VoIP benefits • Place & take phone calls anywhere with network access • Voicemail to email .wav files • Advanced features such as sim-ring, find-me follow-me Value proposition: Incorporate voice and data into one service at lower cost, using a local, responsive provider.
Current cost analysis methods • Costs include… • technical labor • administrative, management and sales labor • office space • advertising • equipment • co-location rent and utilities • circuit and bandwidth charges • G&A, sales, office expenses, etc. are spread as overhead • *Allocated as 42.5% of total sales • Revenues include… • monthly use charges • installation fees
Current product line income statement Per month average for past 4 months
There’s a better way to allocate costs Analyze costs for 4 product groups three data products new voice product Allocate using activity-based costing Can labor (including G&A) cost allocation be improved? Restate costs, margins and profits for previous 4 month avg Does ABC tell us anything new? Report to Rockynet Management
Cost allocation process Define activities new customer acquisition installation continuing operations G&A (running the business) Interview staffExecutive staff Provisioning coordinator Technical staff Sales staff Total the activity costs Calculate the rates & Allocate the costs
Allocation of non-labor costs • T1 circuits • a per circuit charge • relevant to all products in our analysis • These costs can be directly allocated to each of the four products • T3 circuits • larger “pipes” that multiplex 24 T1s • allocation of T3s is a batch level cost is determined by the number of T1s • Equipment • Switches, routers, aggregation and interface equipment • Allocate these expenses directly to products as Cost of Goods sold
Staff contributions to activities Interviews with staff provided the following: Key finding: Executive staff spend 55% of time on non G&A activities
Cost drivers for activities • New customer acquisition cost • estimated number of hours spent gaining customers • estimated fraction of time spent on voice and data • Cost driver is $ / new customer acquisition hours • Installation cost • found # tech hours to install each product • found # provisioning hours to install each product • Cost driver is $ / install • Continuing operations • totaled the costs to keep the networks running • Cost driver is the number of customers • Allocated labor costs using these activities and drivers
Tech Staff Data lines Provisioning coordinator Exec staff Sales Staff Equipment Continuing operations New customer acquisition Install G&A $ per hour of continuing ops $ per install $ per customer $ per acq hour TNET Co-Lo Voice T1 Activity-based costing model
Other overhead costs Other costs allocated Advertising cost 100% allocated to voice Office rental costs (based on occupants) Suite 1: Acquisition pool Suite 2 & 3: continuing operations pool Suite 4: 25% continuing ops / 75% G&A Equipment space rent and utilities cost this cost only applies to CoLo G&A: allocated by continuing ops labor hours
What happened?? • G&A was previously spread over all products • this ignores significant effort toward voice product sales • CoLo direct costs increased with ABC • previously, CoLo rent/utilities were spread as overhead • now applying directly to CoLo product • T1 non-direct costs decreased significantly. • T1 product needs little support • number of customers is a better cost driver for direct costs
What about voice?? • Voice losses expected at this point • a new product introduction • a substantial growth opportunity • Acquisition costs for voice are causing a loss • review sales force compensation / change sales incentives • Is the CEO salary a relevant cost?? • Effective cost control will be key to the product’s success • consider strategies for decreasing installation costs • learning curve for installations • reduce VOIP equipment costs through partnering
Conclusions Accurate costing is a beautiful thing