230 likes | 473 Views
Semiconductor Modeling And Test Chip Design for Characterization of Radiation Effects. Sotiris Athanasiou National Trainee, TEC-EDM Supervisors: Boris Glass, Richard Jansen. SCOPE. Radiation Effects Semiconductor Modeling TCAD modeling and Doping problem
E N D
Semiconductor Modeling And Test Chip Design for Characterization of Radiation Effects Sotiris Athanasiou National Trainee, TEC-EDM Supervisors: Boris Glass, Richard Jansen
SCOPE Radiation Effects Semiconductor Modeling • TCAD modeling and Doping problem • Compact Models and extensions on verilogA Test Chip • Muxes • Test Structures • WideBand Amplifier • Layout Rad Effects on SRAM FPGA designs| Sotiris Athanasiou | ESTEC,NL| Data doc | Presentation| Pag. 2
Radiation Effects Space is a difficult place for electronics to operate! Ionized Particles and protons hit the device: TID SEE SEU,MBU,SEFI,SEL,SEB,SEGR,SET Space engineering, Techniques for Radiation Effects Mitigation in ASICs and FPGAs European Space Agency Space engineering, Calculation of radiation and its effects and margin policy handbook European Space Agency Rad Effects on SRAM FPGA designs| Sotiris Athanasiou | ESTEC,NL| Data doc | Presentation| Pag. 3
Total Ionizing Dose TID creates trapped charge in the MOS structure in MOSFET: • Vth Shift • TID leakage currents
Single Event Transient More complex phenomena: a)A plasma track with e-h pairs is created b)A path of free carriers between p and n areas – funnel c)Charge generated outside diffuses to junction
Why this work Usually testing is done afterwards more on gate level, and less on transistor level. Radiation effects not available in simulation of space electronics. Same concept at ESD design • Requires Technology information for simulation
TCAD model towards electrical behavior under radiation 1/3 TCAD commercial software extended with Geant4 (high energy physics simulator) Technology parameters Electrical behavior under radiation 3d Mesh Geant4 simulations GDSII
TCAD model towards electrical behavior under radiation 2/3 Correctness of Technology parameters: Technology parameters /home/soathana/Desktop/TCAD/IdVd.png /home/soathana/Desktop/TCAD/IdVd.png /home/soathana/Desktop/TCAD/IdVd.png /home/soathana/Desktop/TCAD/IdVd.png TCAD model Drift diffusion simulation Spice simulation Foundry spice model results
TCAD model towards electrical behavior under radiation 3/3 TCAD modeling: Technology parameters extracted from DESMICREX study And foundry PDK info a)Major problem remains Doping profiles 1D vs 3D Without foundry access it is difficult to obtain Doping. Methods exist to extract from electrical behavior doping, with some accuracy rely on development of custom code. b)Luck of methodology on parameters to match
Compact Models 1/4 Compact Model approach to overcome these issues Umc 90 nm PDK BSIM4 Compact Model Use of Silvaco VerilogA BSIM4 implementation • Model card extraction into VerilogA model • Fix errors/ remove unused code • Implement SET, TID leakage into modified model • simulate
Compact Models 2/4 VerilogA electrical behavior against cadence implementation. Tested against dedicated Matlab model. A lot of interesting issues arise regarding to what extent parameters need to be matched IV, CV, Vth, Idiode e.t.c. Compact Model Approach offers a lot of advantages: 1)Access to equation parameters as well as device parameters 2)Better behavior with respect to paracitics 3)No circuit modifications 4)Foundry sensitive parameters not required
Compact Models 3/4 compact model SET simulation compact model TID leakage simulation
Compact Models 4/4 • Parameters extracted from relevant available publications • This does gives an indication but not specific values. • Data can lead to predictions but in some cases can lead to over/under estimating the behavior • Need experimental results to fine tune the equations (parameter extraction)
Characterization Test Chip and compact model modification Umc180 example, substrate resistor network. rbodyMod = 0 (Off) rbodyMod = 1 (On) rbodyMod = 2 (On : Scalable Substrate Network): {5R/3R/1R} Does rbodyMod 0 means no res? NO!
Characterization Test Chip Design Must have a large number of devices to characterize Minimum number of pins possible Must facilitate a large number of measurements MUX architecture
Characterization Test Chip Design 1K devices of each type, placed in 5 rows of 200 • Investigate charge sharing Possible types of measurements • CV • IV • Noise • Matching • TID leakage • SET pulse • 4 terminal (Kelvin) measurements
Characterization Test Chip Design Wide Band Amplifier to test behavior under high frequencies. Extract SET pulse shape for first time.
Characterization Test Chip Design Building test benches to test functionality A.D. OP27 behavioral model for simulation purposes
Characterization Test Chip layout Test Structures -generated automatically through cadence SKILL -Each block contains 14K DUTs
Characterization Test Chip layout MUX layout
Future Work Finalize Test Chip->Tape out Measurements Fitting Measurement data to Models-> extract parameters Insert parameters back to models Once proof of concept verified, can easily generate new test structures and fabricate next characterization chips. Rad Effects on SRAM FPGA designs| Sotiris Athanasiou | ESTEC,NL| Data doc | Presentation| Pag. 21
THANK YOU Sotiris Athanasiousotirios.athanasiou@esa.int athanasiou.sotiris@gmail.com