210 likes | 526 Views
Evaluation of the Perpendicular–V Peach Orchard Training System Applicability Study for the Southern Maryland Region, 1999-2006. CMREC , Upper Marlboro. R. David Myers Presented by Anne DeMarsay. Peach Training System Study CMREC, Upper Marlboro. Planted April 14, 1999
E N D
Evaluation of the Perpendicular–V Peach Orchard Training System Applicability Study for the Southern Maryland Region, 1999-2006 CMREC , Upper Marlboro R. David Myers Presented by Anne DeMarsay
Peach Training System Study CMREC, Upper Marlboro • Planted April 14, 1999 • Monmouth Fine Sandy Loam Soil • Fertilizer and Lime Applied in Tilled Strips • Heading Cut to: 24” for Standard Open- Center, & 20” for Perpendicular-V System, • Tall Fescue Drilled in Row Alleyways
Peach Training System Study CMREC, Upper Marlboro • Arranged Complete Block, 3 REPS with 7 Peach Varieties: • Candor • Garnet Beauty • Red Haven • Flamin’Fury PF 15A • Bounty • Cresthaven • Fantasia (Nectarine) • Training Systems: • Open Center 20’ X 16” • Perpendicular-V 20’ X 8” Note: V-Tree fruit trellis established in March of 2nd Leaf.
March 2001 3rd Leaf V-System
March 2001 3rd Leaf Open Center
May 2001 3rd leaf V-System
July 2001 3rd leaf Open Center
July 2002 4th Leaf V-System
Open Center: 136 trees/Acre X 45.9 lbs/tree = 6,202 lbs/Acre V-System: 272 trees/Acre X 42.1 lbs/tree =11,451 lbs/Acre
May 2004 6th Leaf V-System
Open Center: 136 trees/Acre V-System: 272 trees/Acre
Peach Training System Study Conclusions • Perpendicular-V Pros • Heavy Early Yields/Acre • New Varieties are Quick to Market • Compact Orchard with Twice the Number of Trees/Acre • Lower Input Costs • Perpendicular-V Cons • Pruning and Scaffold Development Laborious • Harder to Size Control V-Trees – Not Recommended on Productive Ag Soils • Fruit Thinning & Harvesting is More Difficult • Higher Disease Pressure – Irregular Spray Coverage
Thank You! Any Questions? myersrd@umd.edu www.annearundel.umd.edu