1 / 8

Compound Nucleus Reactions

Compound Nucleus Reactions. Direct. Time. Energy. CN decays. Two-step reaction. CN “forgets” how it was formed. Decay of CN depends on statistical factors that are functions of E x , J . Low energy projectile, medium or heavy target. E a CM. Q CN. Compound Nucleus Reactions.

keaton-knox
Download Presentation

Compound Nucleus Reactions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Compound Nucleus Reactions Direct • Time. • Energy. CN decays • Two-step reaction. • CN “forgets” how it was formed. • Decay of CN depends on statistical factors that are functions of Ex, J. • Low energy projectile, medium or heavy target. EaCM QCN Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, 2007-2008 (Saed Dababneh).

  2. Compound Nucleus Reactions Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, 2007-2008 (Saed Dababneh).

  3. Compound Nucleus Reactions • Considerp + 63Cu at EpCM= 20 MeV. • Calculate Ep + [m(63Cu) + m(p) – m(64Zn)]c2. • Divide by 64  available energy per nucleon << 8 MeV. • Multiple collisions  “long” time  statistical distribution of energy  small chance for a nucleon to get enough energy Evaporation. • Higher incident energy  more particles “evaporate”. See also Fig. 11.21 in Krane. Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, 2007-2008 (Saed Dababneh).

  4. Direct Reactions • Random collisions  nearly isotropic angular distribution. • Direct reaction component  strong angular dependence. See also Fig. 11.20 in Krane. Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, 2007-2008 (Saed Dababneh).

  5. Direct Reactions • Peripheral collision with surface nucleon. • 1 MeV incident nucleon   ??  more likely to interact with the nucleus  CN reaction. • 20 MeV incident nucleon   ??  peripheral collision  Direct reaction. • CN and Direct (D) processes can happen at the same incident particle energy. Distinguished by: • D (10-22 s) CN (10-18-10-16 s). [Consider a 20 MeV deuteron on A=50 target nucleus]. • Angular distribution. Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, 2007-2008 (Saed Dababneh).

  6. Direct Reactions • (d,n) stripping (transfer) reactions can go through both processes. • (d,p) stripping (transfer) reactions prefer D rather than CN; protons do not easily evaporate (Coulomb). [(p,d) is a pickup reaction]. • What about (,n) transfer reactions? HW 36 Show that for a (d,p) reaction taking place on the surface of a 90Zr nucleus, and with 5 MeV deuterons, the angular momentum transfer can be approximated by l = 8sin(/2), where  is the angle the outgoing proton makes with the incident deuteron direction. (Derive a general formula first). J(90Zrgs) = 0+ J(91Zr) = l ± ½, = (-1)l Fig. 11.23 in Krane. Optical model, DWBA, Shell model, Spectroscopic Factor. Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, 2007-2008 (Saed Dababneh).

  7. Neutron-induced Reactions X(n,b)Y b(Q+En) n(En) Probability to penetrate the potential barrier Po(Ethermal) = 1 P>o(Ethermal) = 0 For thermal neutrons Q >> En b(Q)  constant Non-resonant Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, 2007-2008 (Saed Dababneh).

  8. Neutron-induced Reactions Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, 2007-2008 (Saed Dababneh).

More Related