1 / 45

Comparing (HF) Contest Software

Comparing (HF) Contest Software. CCF Meeting January 2004 Marko Holmavuo, OH4JFN oh4jfn@sral.fi. Raise your hand...now!. Who are famous with: CT? N6TR? Writelog? N1MM? Other?. Why logging software?. Not so serious effort: It makes contesting more enjoyable

keith
Download Presentation

Comparing (HF) Contest Software

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparing (HF) Contest Software CCF Meeting January 2004 Marko Holmavuo, OH4JFN oh4jfn@sral.fi

  2. Raise your hand...now! • Who are famous with: • CT? • N6TR? • Writelog? • N1MM? • Other?

  3. Why logging software? • Not so serious effort: It makes contesting more enjoyable • Serious effort: Maximize your score!

  4. Requirements for Logging SW • Stable • Easy to use (at least when the ”heat is on”) • Good and logical user interface! • Fast enough • Versatile + Configurable • Post-contest functionality • Enough features for ”serious operating” • Product support (bug fixing, further development etc)

  5. Program development • Lack of general modules • CW Keying, Different kind of algorhytms, Rig control etc. • => Developers start to work with ”must to have features” instead of doing new innovations

  6. How to support development work? • Give feedback: • If giving bug-report, make detailed instruction how to repeat misfunctionality. • If proposing new idea/feature, give detailed plan how this new feature should work • Pay license!

  7. Categories • Two categories: • ”Everyday” logging SW (e.g. DX4WIN) • Contest software • Most common differencies: • No network support • No SO2R Support • Limited number of supported contests • Raporting&tracking limitations (e.g. awards)

  8. What to choose? • For contesting: CT, TRLog, NA, N1MM, SD Super Duper, TLF( for Linux), Writelog, RCKLog, N3JFP Contest Logs, AALog Contest Module, Genlog + many others

  9. What to choose...Windows? • Windows : • ...requires more from computer • ...can be sometimes unstable • ...makes soundcard,network + other extension usage easier • ...gives more possibilities (UI etc.) • ...makes possibility to use more than 1 display • ...Can cause some timing problems when keying CW (Because of multitasking) • Special keyers are recommended

  10. What to choose... or DOS? • DOS: • ...Lightweight environment • ...Stable • ...Even old 80386 is enough for logging • ...Restricts e.g. UI development • ...Can cause ”problems” when building network, installing SW DVP etc...

  11. What to choose... • For this presentation we selected: • CT • N1MM • TRLog • Writelog + RCKLog and SD as ”wildcards”

  12. What to choose...why these? • Must be suitable for serious contesting: • SO2R Support • ”Enough” supported contests • Support for Multi-operation (M/S, M/2, M/M) • SD and RCKLog doesn’t fullfill all of these requirements

  13. N1MM • Freeware ”open source” logger => No license costs • Makes possible to develop own logger based on N1MM • Window based SW (WIN 95-XP) • MS Access database • Visual Basic implementation • Supports major contests

  14. N1MM... • Network support for Multi-operations • ”Floating window” – UI • Keyboard layout is something like in TRLog or CT • RTTY Support • SO2R development is just started... • CQ and S&P Modes • Function key functionality changes • All basic functionality (Packet, Telnet, CTY database, bandmaps, Partials etc.) • CT super check / country database format

  15. N1MM... • S&P Qso Stack • Also Remote call stacking in Multi-user mode • Multiple antennas on same band (Ctrl-F11) • Antenna relay control (via LPT) • ”Full” radio control (Dual RX ,Splits , Filters, RIT etc) • Built in QSO recording functionality (WAV) • No configurable audio codec (e.g. No MP3 support)

  16. N1MM... • SO2V (Single Operator Two VFO) mode • Statistics (Max rates, Off times, Runs, Suspect calls etc.) • Auto Master and country db downloads • Internet connection required • Online ”add call to country” feature • Auto S&P Qso spotting to cluster network • Time Sync in Multi environment

  17. N1MM... • Log file resyncronization (Multi) • User customizable goals for the contest • Supports Buckmaster or qrz.com website

  18. N1MM Conclusion • Pros: • Free, opensource => Super versatile at least if you are willing to do some coding  • Much functions • Some ”new innovations” • Active support group/update • Manual is very large and detailed • Lot of macros for key function programming

  19. N1MM Conclusion... • Cons: • UI framework /Ergonomy can be better • SO2R Functionality could be better • Lack of post-contest statistics • Much functions => Many way to do ”same” things, can feel ”heavy” to use

  20. Writelog (v. 10.3x) • Windows 95/98 , also NT / 2000 • WIN NT / 2000 (no support for LPT Functions) • 4MB HD Space, 16MB RAM Minium. • Commercial (license costs $75) • Need to request special license for e.g. Pedition • Floating/”Fixed” UI • Possibility to produce own modules (C++) for not supported contests. • RTTY and PSK31 Support (via Soundcard)

  21. Writelog... • SO2R Support • Keyboard functionality like in CT • No different CQ/S&P modes • Function key functionality remains same... • CW&PTT Keying (COM/LPT) • Antenna relay control (via LPT) • Radio control support (Kenwood, Yaesu, Icom, Ten-Tec, JRC) • Support major contests

  22. Writelog... Networking possibilities for Multi contesting (NetBEUI protocol) • Automatic log sync. • All basic functionality (Packet, Telnet, CTY database, bandmaps, Partials etc.) • CT super check / country database format • Soundcard DVK (Same features as K1EA DVK) • Support operator specific recordings • Writelog Sound mixer level controller (picture) • Support for different Audio file codecs (e.g. MP3) • Support ”listen this Qso” functionality • When using SO2R SW based mic ”switching used”

  23. Writelog... • Possibility to share logbook using the internet (needs some extra software) • Support up to 4 rigs (SO4R ;) • Rotator Control support (COM) • Search and Pounce Frequency Mem (1-4) • QSL Handling • ”Funny” Logging Simulator (ADIF) • Support Wheel Mouse (Tune your Rig with wheel)

  24. Writelog conclusion • Pros: • ”Configurable” UI, Overall design • Versatile: Modules • DVK, RTTY • Cons: • Lack of good post-contest statistics tool • SO2R Functionality could be better • No demo version available • User cannot do all configuration using Graphical UI (if INI file editing is needed, manual needed)

  25. RCKLog • Windows (95-XP) based logging SW by DL4RCK • License costs 50Euro/US$ • +5/10 Euro/US$ depending delivery/payment issues • Support major contests (inc. e.g. SAC) • Cabrillo, ADIF and STF file format supported • Online logging using EQSL web database. • Radio control support (most brands)

  26. RCKLog... • CW-Keying (COM&LPT), PTT, DVK triggering (LPT) • Soundcard DVK • can also speak e.g. callsigns from recorded letters • Supports network (up to 12 stations) • Master/Slave architecture • Supports clock synchronization • Support WinKey (by K1EL and G3WGV) • Support for TNC/Telnet cluster connection • Support for master file (Call partial check)

  27. RCKLog... • Support for Callbook CD-ROM’s • RAC, HamCall, Buckmaster • S&P and CQ modes • Supports Quick Qso Entry functionality (ESM in N1MM).

  28. RCKLog Conclusion • Pros: • Basic contest logging sw • Basic post contest tool • Cons: • Network architecture, if Master computer fails all logging ends also from other stations. • No SO2R support • Seems to be quite unstable (crashes) • Some serious UI Bugs (at least in unregistered 1.38)

  29. TRLog by N6TR • DOS-software (Programmed with Turbo Pascal?) • Windows in Command prompt mode • Commercial license ($75 inc. 1 year update subscription) • 80286 or better • Log is based on ascii-file • Support over 60 contests, more can be ”customized” • All basic functionality (CTY database, bandmaps, Partials etc.) • Radio control support • RTTY Support (with multimode TNCs) • SO2R Support

  30. TRLog • CW & PTT Keying (COM&LPT) • Paddle input • Antenna relay control (LPT) • Packet support (TNC) • Network support • DVP Support (e.g. W9XT card) • SW DVK with external software • DVK Triggering via LPT • CQ and S&P Modes • Function key functionality changes

  31. TRLog... • Separate Post-utility for statistics • Macros for function key programming • CW simulator for training • Footswitch Support • Telnet support available with external software (Windows SW)

  32. TRLog conclusion • Pros: • Very configurable and flexible • Post-Contest tools (statistic etc.) • SO2R Support • Support/development is working actively • Manual is good • Free version available (based on 6.69) • Long history • Cons: • At first configuring might be confusing • Hard to remember all config. parameters (Manual needed) • External SW needed for DVK

  33. CT by K1EA • Has been one of the most famous logging SW since 1985. • Nowadays Freeware • Both DOS & Windows (Character mode SW) versions • Website indicates that WIN95 is not supported • Binary based logfile format • Support major contests

  34. CT by K1EA • Radio control support • Network support • Packet support (TNC) • Voice Keyer control (LPT) • Support for K1EA DVP card • CW&PTT keying • Rotator support • Antenna relay control (via LPT)

  35. CT By K1EA • All basic functionality (CTY database, bandmaps, Partials etc.) • Telnet support available with external software (Windows SW)

  36. CT Conclusion • Pros: • Easy to use and learn • Freeware • Long history • Support/bug fixing is still alive. • Cons: • SO2R support • Feedback indicates that it can be quite unstable in some environments (CTWIN+Multi operation)

  37. SD • EI5DI has made a collection for Logging • 9 Different programs • SD/WIN for windows (Character-based) • SD/DOS for DOS • Many different programs for other purposes • SDI for IOTA, SDU for UBA, SDI for RSGB Common wealth etc... • Inteded for Single OP Unassisted classes

  38. SD... • All basic functionality (Dupe check, Multiplier check, Partial check, Beam headings) • Supports master.dta for super check partial • Support some of the most known contests • Radio support for Icom, Kenwood and Yaesu

  39. SD • CW-Keying via serial ports • parallel in DOS • Cabrillo/ADIF support

  40. SD • Pros: • Simple • Screen space is efficiently used • Demo version available • Cons: • No support for packet/network • No SO2R support

  41. Feature Comparison

  42. Feature Comparison

  43. Feature Comparison

  44. Overall conclusion • My personal opinion: • For serious SO2R operating, N6TR is so far best choice (let’s see how N1MM SW will ”grow”) • For SO1R(Assisted) + Multi operations there are not ”solid” answer: Check N1MM first to see if it could be your choice, if license cost is not problem, get familiar with Writelog and compare it against N1MM and CT.

  45. Future: • Electronic QSL service support (LOTW, eQSL) • SW Based SO2R audio switching (using Soundcards) • Put more focus for smooth SO2R operating • Real-time ”analyse”/support functionality

More Related