1 / 18

1) Beam Impedance calculation for slotted kicker and 2) Three kicker option with cavities

1) Beam Impedance calculation for slotted kicker and 2) Three kicker option with cavities. A. Gallo on behalf of the INFN Frascati Hi- Lumi LHC Broadband FBK Team* (*) D. Alesini , A. Drago , A. Gallo, F. Marcellini , M. Zobov .

kelvin
Download Presentation

1) Beam Impedance calculation for slotted kicker and 2) Three kicker option with cavities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1) Beam Impedance calculation for slotted kicker and2) Three kicker option with cavities A. Galloon behalf of the INFN Frascati Hi-Lumi LHC Broadband FBK Team* (*) D. Alesini, A. Drago, A. Gallo, F. Marcellini, M. Zobov.

  2. Initial impedance calculations for slotted kicker D. Mc. Ginnis Impedance simulations with GdfidL started on a simple slotted structure made by 2 rectangular waveguides on both top and bottom sides of the beam pipe. Imaginary Real

  3. Slotted Kicker Impedance Calculations Comparison ReZL Longitudinal ReZT Transverse Moment method (J.Cesaratto, SLAC) GdfidL (M.Zobov, LNF INFN)

  4. SlottedKicker Shunt ImpedanceComparison Total power flux in the two waveguides HFSS (D.Alesini, LNF INFN) Moment method (J.Cesaratto, SLAC)

  5. Slotted-coaxial kicker Impedance calculation Design evolution

  6. Parameter Comparison 1000 52 132 2 50 150 20 80 5 OK 3 80 Last Old

  7. Longitudinal Impedance Gaussian bunch, σz = 2 cm 25 ns

  8. Total Power Loss 25 ns sz = 12 cm P = 820 W for 12 cm bunch length, Nb = 144, N = 4.09x1011 Because of the device directionality, most of the power is expected to be dissipated into the dummy loads connected to the downstream ports. A precise evaluation of the delivered power partition among ports and structure walls is needed.

  9. TransverseWakes and Impedance (2 cm bunchlength, 2 mm offset) Gaussian bunch, σz = 2 cm 25 ns

  10. CONCLUSIONS #1 • We should not expect any additional harmful multibunch effects due to the slotted kicker since both longitudinal and transverse wakes decay in time shorter than the minimum bunch spacing of 25 ns • The low frequency longitudinal impedance of 0.024 W is very small in comparison with the overall SPS longitudinal impedance budget (10 W ) • The longitudinal loss factor for the shortest bunch length in SPS of 12 cm is estimated to be kl = 3.06x1010 V/C . This corresponds to the total lost power of 820 W for the worst scenario (Np =4.09x1011, Nb = 144), mainly flowing out through the device downstream ports. • The real and imaginary parts of the total transverse impedance do not exceed 100 kW/m - to be compared with ≈ 7 MW/m contributed by the other SPS kickers.

  11. 2) Three kicker option with cavities Question: is a continuous, almost flat broadband frequency response strictly necessary to kick selected bunch portions? If not, is it possible to reduce the system bandwidth requirements? bunch Gaussian time domain pulse Gaussian frequency response A broadband system is capable to kick only a limited portion of the bunch (≈1/6 of the SPS bunch for a BW ≥ 1 GHz). The kick is (almost) negligible on the remaining part of the bunch, and it is also zero outside the bunch at any time. Brute bandwidth approach!

  12. The gaussian time domain pulse can be replicated with a repetition Tp≥ b, being b the total bunch duration (including tails). The pulse replica will not affect the selected bunch, and the signal bandwidth becomes discrete. The amplitude of the coefficients of the Fourier expansions is modulated by a gaussian profile in frequency domain. bunch Linesof the Fourier expansion Gaussiantime domain pulsetrain The same intra-bunch resolution can be obtained with a discrete spectrum. Obviously, an expansion made with pure sine-waves with constant amplitudes will kick all the bunches in the same way. To kick and control individually each bunch, each sine wave has to be multiplied by a damping term so that the individual kick will decay to a negligible value before the next bunch arrive.

  13. Lorentziansof the Fourier transform Gaussiantime domain pulsetrain next bunch bunch For practical reasons the expansion has to be limited to the few first bands. Satisfactory results could be obtained already with the first 3 lines. next bunch bunch

  14. To generate the 3 deflecting harmonics, 3 different back end chains culminating into 3 different kickers can be used. Being the frequency of the 1st harmonic ≈ 400 MHz (bunch duration ≤ 2.5 ns), a compact and cost effective solution is to use a stripline extending its bandwidth from DC (bunch transverse rigid motion). For the 2nd and 3rd harmonics overloaded deflecting cavities working in the TM110 mode can be used. TM110 cavities 55 cm stripline Deflecting voltages delivered by striplines and TM110 single cell cavities excited with 1 kW RF power. 17 cm stripline

  15. Broadband kickerfor SPS intrabunch feedback system F. Marcellini(on leave of absence from INFN LNF) H

  16. Architecture of a 3-kickers intrabunch feedback system Betatron oscillations of each bunch beamlet are tracked and 90° phase shifted by digital filters. The resulting kick profile for each bunch is Fourier expanded. The amplitude and phase of each harmonics are provided to the back-ends, at a clock rate equal to the bunch repetition frequency.

  17. Example: transferring a (1,0,0,0,-1) kick profile to a selected bunch Consider the case of a bunch divided into 5 beamlets that needs to be kicked only at its extremities, and with opposite polarities, i.e. a (1,0,0,0,-1) kick. Amplitude and phase of the first 3 harmonics of the kick profile are calculated (Fourier expansion) and, just after the passage of the preceding bunch, loaded in the back-ends. The kick reaches the regime at the bunch passage, and since then the back ends are switched off (or loaded with the values relative to the next bunch). The kick across the bunch is smoothed by the expansion truncation, but it still acceptably reproduces a (1,0,0,0,-1) profile.

  18. CONCLUSIONS #2 • Building up the kick voltage through a Fourier - frequency domain – approach is attractive to relax the broadband requirements to the system back-end (kickers and amplifiers); • The use of 3 harmonics seems sufficient to discriminate and selectively deflect small portions of the bunch (at level of 15÷20% of the entire length); • Kickers and amplifiers working at specific frequencies with a minimum required band of the order of 30 MHz are less critic and more efficient with respect to continuous, broadband devices. The global equalization is also simpler. BUT … • The broadband shunt impedance of optimized slotted kickers is comparable (or larger!) than the peak values provided by deflecting cavities and striplines; • The data process in the feedback architecture is more complicated and can not be just a data streaming from the BPM to the kicker. • The overall amount of hardware required and the beam pipe space occupancy are larger.

More Related