1 / 18

Library IT Task Force Open Forum Dec. 4, 2008

Library IT Task Force Open Forum Dec. 4, 2008. Library Strategies. 1890’s Library Reading Room 1899 – 10,056 volumes. Colorado State University Libraries -2008. Over 2 million volumes in four locations Increased use of digital content and decreasing use of print. Print Collection.

kerryn
Download Presentation

Library IT Task Force Open Forum Dec. 4, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Library IT Task Force Open ForumDec. 4, 2008 Library Strategies

  2. 1890’s Library Reading Room1899 – 10,056 volumes

  3. Colorado State University Libraries -2008 Over 2 million volumes in four locations Increased use of digital content and decreasing use of print.

  4. Print Collection

  5. Library Challenges • Morgan Library regular shelves are over capacity and bound journal shelves are 80% capacity • Lake St. Depository shelves are at capacity • Increasing demand for digital content

  6. Required Storage Space • FY09 - Space needed for 110,000 volumes • FY10-FY15 – Each year the Library collection will grow approximately 20,000 volumes.

  7. Storage and Maintenance Costs • Offsite Storage Option $1 million one time construction and $500,000 annual for staffing and transportation • Onsite Storage Option FY08 CSU Building Costs - $350-450 square foot.

  8. Sustainability Plan By maximizing storage space in current facilities resources can be used for more electronic resources rather than building and staffing new large storage facilities. • Install additional compact shelving and build small addition at the Lake St. Depository • Decrease print equivalents in the collection. • Purchase additional digital content.

  9. Reduce Need for Storage • Purchase Government Document electronic collections and remove print equivalents Space for 60,000 books • Remove print indexes duplicated by electronic databases Space for 15,000 books • Remove bound journals duplicated by electronic journal subscriptions. Space for 150,000 books • Increasing digital content decreases future storage requirements

  10. Faculty and Graduate Student Survey Responses

  11. Comments: Removing Print Indexes. • If I understand this question you are asking that if you have it electronically, do I support getting rid of hard copies. In every case, I will always prefer electronic copies. • I'm fairly old school, I like having a physical copy and there is always a chance of system failure, but I do see the wisdom in freeing up the space. • But, isn't there a reserve somewhere that we can store old books? Or does "removing these physical indexes" mean they would be permanently unavailable? • It is hard to believe that the indexes alone will take the same space as 10K books. You mean the old bound volumes? • Please try to sell these volumes or donate to small, struggling libraries, especially those in disadvantaged areas of our country, or to third-world countries allied to the U.S. • All Master of Fine Arts thesis abstracts should be kept on shelves.

  12. Survey Responses

  13. Comments: Do you support removing duplicate books and U.S. Government Documents? • Keep duplicate books in high traffic subject areas. • Keep duplicates in subject areas core to CSU such as agriculture and natural resources. • There are some duplicate titles of which there is quite a bit of demand. Don't eliminate the second copy if it is frequently used. • This is a more complicated decision. There is rationale for maintaining multiple physical copies of materials in high demand.

  14. Survey Responses

  15. Comments: Removing Print Journals. • I strongly agree with this. I never access any journal in the library that is available online. • If this includes old magazines, are full pages scanned, or just articles reprinted? It is important to be able to see all the content, Advertisements and images are significant sources of information… • Not all older journals are available electronically. If all older journals were available electronically I would support their removal. • As long as we have access to the electronic versions of the journals, I support removing the hard copies. I see how removing the old print journals will save space in the library, but how does removing the old print journals save money that can be used to purchase additional electronic content? • Many of the articles from these journals are likely available for free on PubMed

  16. Comments: Removing Print Journal Equivalents of Electronic Journals. • This should only be done title by title, with the subject librarian making the choice. • I support this with a yes ONLY if the appropriate disciplines are given the opportunity to keep the journals in their respective departments. • Is it possible to make such journals available to faculty before they are disposed of? • Caution. We learned from Apollo 13 not to totally depend on technology, and some kind of back-up access should be ensured.

  17. Independent Electronic ArchivesPortico and LOCKSS Portico serves as a permanent archive for electronic journals, electronic books and digital newspapers. LOCKSS provides software that allows commercially published digital content to be stored locally.

  18. Questions and Comments Information on the Library IT Task Force - http://lib.colostate.edu/about/goals/it/

More Related