1 / 38

Studying mortality trends: The IMPACT CHD Policy Model

Studying mortality trends: The IMPACT CHD Policy Model. Prof Simon Capewell Chair of Clinical Epidemiology DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY UK 14 th January 2008 Particular thanks to: Julia Critchley, Kath Bennett Martin O’Flaherty, Robin Ireland, Ann Capewell.

kiet
Download Presentation

Studying mortality trends: The IMPACT CHD Policy Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Studying mortality trends:The IMPACT CHD Policy Model Prof Simon Capewell Chair of Clinical Epidemiology DIVISION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY UK 14th January 2008 Particular thanks to:Julia Critchley, Kath Bennett Martin O’Flaherty, Robin Ireland, Ann Capewell Charity No: 1110067

  2. International mortality trends1968-2003men, coronary heart disease [CHD] Source:BHF Heartstats (WHO statistics Men aged 35 - 74, Standardised)

  3. International mortality trends1968-2003men, coronary heart disease [CHD] Why have CHD mortality rates halved? Source:BHF Heartstats (WHO statistics Men aged 35 - 74, Standardised)

  4. Explaining the fall in coronary heart disease deaths in England & Wales 1981-2000 ? Why did CHD mortality halve in spite of population ageing?? 68,230 fewer deaths in 2000  1981 2000 Unal, Critchley & Capewell Circulation 2004 109(9) 1101

  5. Explaining the fall in coronary heart disease deaths in England & Wales 1981-2000 • Risk Factors worse +13% • Risk Factors better -71% • Treatments -42% 68,230 fewer deaths in 2000  1981 2000 Unal, Critchley & Capewell Circulation 2004 109(9) 1101

  6. Explaining the fall in coronary heart disease deaths in England & Wales 1981-2000 • Risk Factors worse +13% • Obesity (increase) +3.5% • Diabetes (increase) +4.8% • Physical activity (less) +4.4% • Risk Factors better -71% • Smoking -41% • Cholesterol -9% • Population BP fall -9% • Deprivation -3% • Other factors -8% • Treatments -42% • AMI treatments -8% • Secondary prevention -11% • Heart failure -12% • Angina:CABG & PTCA -4% • Angina: Aspirin etc -5% • Hypertension therapies -3% 68,230 fewer deaths in 2000  1981 2000 Unal, Critchley & Capewell Circulation 2004 109(9) 1101

  7. Risk Factors obviously powerful but was it tablets or lifestyles??

  8. CHD preventionin England & Wales1981-2000:Population v.High Risk StrategiesDeaths prevented or postponed(Sensitivity analysis ) Population secular trends C h o l e s t e r o l Population diet Blood Pressure Diet in CHD patients Statins CHD patients Treating High Risk Secular trends CHD patients High Risk Statins Unal et al BMJ 2005 331 614

  9. CHD preventionin England & Wales1981-2000:Population v.High Risk StrategiesDeaths prevented or postponed(Sensitivity analysis ) Population secular trends C h o l e s t e r o l Population diet Blood Pressure Diet in CHD patients Statins CHD patients Treating High Risk Secular trends CHD patients High Risk Statins Unal et al BMJ 2005 331 614

  10. Explaining the fall in CHD deaths in USA 1980-2000 : RESULTS NEJM 2007; 356: 2388. • Risk Factors worse +17% • Obesity (increase) +7% • Diabetes (increase) +10% • Risk Factors better -65% • Population BP fall -20% • Smoking -12% • Cholesterol (diet) -24% • Physical activity -5% • Treatments -47% • AMI treatments -10% • Secondary prevention -11% • Heart failure -9% • Angina:CABG & PTCA -5% • Hypertension therapies -7% • Statins (primary prevention) -5% • Unexplained -9% 341,745 fewer deaths in 2000  1980 2000

  11. Comparisons with other studies: % CHD mortality falls attributed to NEJM 2007; 356: 2388.

  12. EXPLOITING THE IMPACT MODEL • Replication in other populations • Populations with RISING CHD • Calculating life-years gained • Cost effectiveness • WHAT IF treatment uptakes increased? • WHAT IF risk factors reduced further?

  13. WHAT IF Treatment Uptakes in England & Wales Increased?ActualUptakes  50% 25,805 Deaths prevented or postponed (DPPs)IF Uptakes at least 80% 20,910additionalDPPs Capewell et al Heart 2006 92 521 [ Capewell, Pell et al et al Eur Heart J 1999 201836 ]

  14. IF Treatment Uptakes Increased in England & WalesActualUptakes  50% 25,805 Deaths prevented/ postponed (DPPs)IF Uptakes at least 80% 20,910additionalDPPs Capewell et al Heart 2006 92 521

  15. EXPLOITING THE IMPACT MODEL • Replication in other populations • Populations with RISING CHD • Calculating life-years gained • Cost effectiveness • WHAT IF treatment uptakes increased? • WHAT IF risk factors reduced further?

  16. Estimating the potential changes in CHD mortality in England & Wales between 2000 and 2010 WHAT IF risk factors a) continue recent trends ? b) undergo additional reductions ? (as already achieved in Australia, USA, Sweden, Finland etc) Unal et al J Clin Epid 2005 58 733 Kelly & Capewell HDA 2004 www

  17. Potential changes in CHD mortality in England & Wales between 2000 and 2010IF risk factors a) continue recent trends b) additional reductions already achieved elsewhere Unal et al J Clin Epid 2005 58 733

  18. The IMPACT Model Thus, to reduce CHD mortality in UK • Modest additional risk factor reductions already achieved in USA & Scandinavia • could prevent or postpone over 50,000 deaths by 2010 • halving current CHD deaths (100,000) in UK Unal et al J Clin Epid 2005 58 733

  19. hence: Heart of Mersey CHD primary prevention programme Key Targets: • Healthier food • Smoking reduction

  20. Is the party over?

  21. US Trends in age-adjusted CHD mortality rates: men & women aged ≥35 years Ford & Capewell JACC 2007 50 2128

  22. US Trends in AGE-SPECIFIC CHD mortality rates: men & women aged ≥35 years Ford & Capewell JACC 2007 50 2128

  23. Trends in age-specific CHD mortality rates England & Wales 1984-2004[lines indicate 5 year moving averages] Heart~ July 2007 doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.118323

  24. Using IMPACT to explain CHD trends and examine future policy optionsConclusions CHD mortality: big falls in UK & elsewhere • 25%-50% due to “evidence-based” therapies • 50% -75% due to risk factor reductions (especially smoking & cholesterol)

  25. Using IMPACT to explain CHD trends and examine future policy optionsConclusions CHD mortality: big falls in UK & elsewhere • 25%-50% due to “evidence-based” therapies • 50% -75% due to risk factor reductions (especially smoking & cholesterol) • small reductions in UK risk factors could Halve CHD deaths • Healthy diet & Tobacco control remain top policy priorities

  26. Reserve slides

  27. IMPACT Model: Main Components Blood Pressure AMI Angina Heart Failure 2' Prevention Medical Therapy RISK F FACTORS Patient Groups TREATMENTS OUTCOMES Cholesterol BMI & Diabetes Smoking Physical Activity Blood Pressure Age & Sex CABG/PTCA surgery Medical Death Survival Ford et al NEJM 2007 356 2388

  28. Modelling UK trends to 2010 2010 predicted Unal, Critchley & Capewell Circulation 2004 109 (9) 1101; J Clin Epid 2005 58 733; Heart 2006 92 521

  29. Modelling UK trends to 2010 predictedIF additional treatmentsper 100,000 If more treatments for more patients  21,000 fewer deaths Unal, Critchley & Capewell Circulation 2004 109 (9) 1101;Heart 2006 92 521;J Clin Epid 2005 58 733

  30. Modelling UK trends to 2010 predictedIF additional treatmentsper 100,000 IF modest risk factor reductions Additionalrisk factor reductions 50,000 fewer deaths If more treatments for more patients  21,000 fewer deaths Unal, Critchley & Capewell Circulation 2004 109 (9) 1101;Heart 2006 92 521;J Clin Epid 2005 58 733

  31. The Natural History of CHD Natural Course of CHD  Atheroma Atheroma & Thrombosis Hanlon, Capewell et al 1997

  32. CHD Prevention options Natural Course of CHD Hanlon, Capewell et al 1997

  33. US Trends in AGE-SPECIFIC CHD mortality rates: men & women aged ≥35 years Ford & Capewell JACC 2007 50 2128

  34. IMPACT2CVD Policy Model Population Policies & Behaviours Biological Risk Factors Combined CVD Risk CVD Patient Groups OUTPUTS

  35. Population Policies & Behaviours Biological Risk Factors Combined CVD Risk CVD Patient Groups OUTPUTS SUDS NON-SUDS Chronic Angina Unstable Angina CHD Death Combined CVD Risk First MI Early Heart Failure From any State Severe Heart Failure Recurrent MI Non-CHD Death MI survivors Stroke Other CVD Populations: UK>E&W>Regions>PCTs Outputs: Population-based incidence, prevalence; Deaths prevented; Life-Years; Life expectancy; Costs; Cost-effectiveness ratios

  36. Population Policies & Behaviours Biological Risk Factors Combined CVD Risk CVD Patient Groups OUTPUTS Diabetes or IGT SUDS NON-SUDS Physical Activity Unstable Angina Chronic Angina CHD Death Combined CVD Risk Obesity (BMI) Diet Cholesterol LDL (& HDL) Early Heart Failure Acute MI From any State Smoking Blood Pressure Severe Heart Failure Recurrent MI Non-CHD Death MI survivors Deprivation Additional CVD Risk Factors Stroke Other CVD Populations: UK>E&W>Regions>PCTs Outputs: Population-based incidence, prevalence; Deaths prevented; Life-Years; Life expectancy; Costs; Cost-effectiveness ratios

  37. IMPACT2structure

  38. Additional risk factor reductions achieved elsewhere UK 2000 level TARGET in 2010 SMOKING 26% 17% (USA 2002) CHOLESTEROL 5.6 5.2 (mmol/l) Gothenberg (Sweden), Stanford (USA) & Perth (Australia) BLOOD PRESSURE (DiastolicBPmmHg) 77 73 (4 mmHg fall) New Zealand (4.4 ) Finland (5.2 ) & France (6.0 ) OBESITY USA: 15% prevalence reduction by 2010 (??) PHYSICAL ACTIVITY increase prevalence by 5% (?) [best] DIABETES No successful community reductions Assume 5% decrease in prevalence (??) Unal et al J Clin Epid 2005 58 733

More Related