230 likes | 362 Views
Team 13—GeoMELT. 12.7.09. The Team. Outline. Project Overview Goals Field Research Preliminary Design Model Experiments Design Norms Acknowledgements Questions. Project Overview. Michigan receives ≈ 72 inches of snow annually .
E N D
Team 13—GeoMELT 12.7.09
Outline • Project Overview • Goals • Field Research • Preliminary Design • Model • Experiments • Design Norms • Acknowledgements • Questions
Project Overview Michigan receives ≈ 72 inches of snow annually http://www.saugus.net/Photos/images/blizzard_05_snowplow.jpg Lake-effect snow can lead to severe storms, but Calvin never cancels class! http://www.duluthstreams.org/understanding/lake_effect.html
Project Overview • Problems with the Burton St. Entrance to Calvin • Intersection is dangerous to plow during the daytime • Safety for Pedestrians and Vehicles • Conventional Snowmelt systems typically near buildings • Proposed Snowmelt Solutions • Closed Geothermal loop using 49° F fluid • Geothermal Ground Source Heat Pump
Goals • Primary: To design a geothermal snowmelt system for Calvin’s Burton Street Entrance • Optimization and comparative analysis between • Heat pump or not? • Asphalt or concrete? • Secondary: To design and construct a small model to demonstrate the operation of a geothermal snowmelt system
Field Research • Design drawings from Moore & Bruggink
Field Research • Design drawings from Moore & Bruggink
Field Research Site visit to Washington Ave. in Grand Haven Commercial snowmelt installation under asphalt
Field Research Steam is supplied by the nearby power plant
Preliminary System Design • Energy Requirements • 120-250 BTU/ft2 for a Type II (commercial) system • 112-330 BTU/ft2 ASHRAE values Buffalo, New York
Preliminary System Design • First attempt at EES Model • Mathematical heat transfer model • Initial calculations are still not accurate enough to give numbers we can rely on • Pipe Design Choices • HDPE for Heat Collection Pipes • PEX for Heat Dissipation Pipes • Thermal Conductivity Considerations • Cost/Benefit Analysis
Preliminary System Design • Heat Pump • With or Without a heat pump? • Rough calculations suggest that if there is no heat pump, the water pump would have to run at > 400 GPM • Heat pump may be required to supply necessary power in order to attain a more reasonable flow rate of < 200 GPM • Heat Pump vs. Steam System • Costs and viability may have to be compared
Preliminary Site Design • Option One: 1300 ft2
Preliminary Site Design • Option Two: 3600 ft2
Preliminary Site Design • Option Three: 4000 ft2
Preliminary Site Design • Option Four: 7000 ft2
Preliminary Site Design • Customer vs. Public Needs • Where do pedestrians walk? • Do they slip and fall? • Do they cross the entrance often? • How might drivers be affected? • Which areas must be melted to solve plowing issues?
Model • Experimental Model • Use to acquire scientific data • Empirically prove viability of geothermal snowmelt • Strictly controlled non-dimensional parameter for heat transfer • Cannot mimic real-world ground heat transfer conditions • Demonstrative Model • Demonstrates operation of a geothermal snowmelt system • Test control system • Not used to acquire empirical data
Experiments • Thermocouples • Suffering the consequences of getting behind schedule • We will install thermocouples at 2, 4, 6, and 8 feet • We will be taking data weekly • Soil Collection • Grain Size Distribution Analysis • Thermal Conductivity Measurements • Wintertime Traffic Study • Vehicle and Pedestrian • Possibly even Plowing Frequency Methods
Design Norms • Stewardship • Save on energy and reduce fossil fuel use • Balance needs and wants with cost and necessity • Caring • Increase safety for pedestrians and vehicles • Transparency • Not going to use smoke and mirrors • The calculations will speak for themselves
Acknowledgements • Charles Huizinga, Calvin College Physical Plant • Marc Huizinga, Calvin College Physical Plant • RenTubergen, Industrial Consultant • Professor Nielsen, Team Advisor • Frank Gorman, Calvin College Architect • Gary Slykhouse, City of GR Engineering Dept. • Bob Bruggink, of Moore & Bruggink • Roy Laisure, of Moore & Bruggink
Questions • We will now take your questions