100 likes | 222 Views
Project Management cont. (2). Need to look to the future w.r.t. planning for obsolescence and changeNeed to ensure that operators have input into priority of changesNeed to ensure continuityNeed flexibilityFunding and schedulingNeed to ensure that each phase has a useful deliverable that can be
E N D
1. Project Management (1) Understanding the scope up front
Particularly for upgrade projects
Understand the sequencing of projects, and have a long term vision
Need flexibility
Need to consider things outside the control room (i.e., holistic view)
Need to ensure feedback from the right people
Particularly operators
Some difficulties in scheduling busy people
Should there be more of them (expensive)?
“ownership”
How soon?
As early as possible
Sell them on the ideas/possibilities
2. Project Management cont. (2) Need to look to the future w.r.t. planning for obsolescence and change
Need to ensure that operators have input into priority of changes
Need to ensure continuity
Need flexibility
Funding and scheduling
Need to ensure that each phase has a useful deliverable that can be lived with on its own
Must be able to discontinue a program after each project
Do more while plant is at power – outage time is limited
Parallel operation opportunities should be used when possible
3. Project Management cont. (3) Controlling cost
Should focus on TCOO (Total Cost of Ownership)?
Having trained managers manage projects
Avoid “Responsibility without Authority”
Best if the project manager has a say in the budget
Need upper management support
Need a trained project team
Need the “right” resources
Need stable, dedicated resources
Many projects are cancelled due to cost overruns
Strategic alliances with vendors
Allow for iterations in requirements
Allow for familiarization time
Price point needs to be realistic for both groups
Need long term plan for maintenance
Get the requirements right
Control the scope
Go back to original requirements, rather than existing system specs
4. Project Management cont. (4) Do more while plant is at power – outage time is limited
If redundant, soft displays should show a view consistent with the physical devices
Specific to digital systems:
Engineering is different
Combination of paradigms (analog, digital)
More focus on HF
Different system behaviour – serial
Need to manage tools (e.g., CAD tools)
Often higher degree of integration required
Sometimes in a very short period
Need to focus on long-term configuration management
Ensure that scope includes removal of old equipment/cables etc.
Need to make a decision – don’t wait for the perfect system
Reuse and share experience for up-front feed back, common equipment w.r.t. projects
IAEA I&C database on modernization activities is one source
Database should be grown to include case studies
5. Implementation (1) Validation continues into implementation – (JD)
Need good document and configuration management for long term maintenance – (JD)
Vendor support needs to be in place early on
Rationale needs to be captured, not just current specs: Ref – presentation 11
Constraint – need to keep control of a plant, even during an outage – (JN)
Need training on new control room devices for when they are in place – (JN)
Aggravated by multiple units, with updates possibly years apart
Possible licensing issue with limited training simulators, people trained for different configurations, etc.
Timing of updating training simulator (desktop and full-scale) needs to be considered – may be on the critical path
Need to consider freezing well before changes are implemented – add to the TOC – (RL)
Test bed – needs to be part of every project? – (YZ)
Needs to be high-fidelity to ensure no problems at the plant
Good for training of maintenance engineers
Ref – presentation 34
6. Implementation cont. (2) How much testing? – (MO)
Guidance on level of testing based on situation should be included
Graded approach
Functions affected
Complexity of the change
Systems affected
Standards that apply
Change management and configuration management – (FD)
Independent checks
Audit trail
Controlled process for updating digital documentation in the control room
Need to include configuration data, documents (e.g., alarm sheets or procedures) as well as code
7. Implementation cont. (3) Handling control rooms that are “easier” to change? – (MF)
What to “lock down”?
What should the operators be allowed to personalize/customize? (e.g., trending)
Different levels of security/access
Need audit trail
Organize the data workflow, traceability to analysis, paper trail for an audit
Need to track who has access as roles change
Who owns the data
Rules for changes on control room systems
8. Implementation cont. (3a) Handling control rooms that are “easier” to change? – (MF)
What to “lock down”?
Generally all engineering and configuration data shall be locked out. Needed access has to specifically granted in adequate levels to clearly defined roles, eg. Maintenance, engineering, system administration.
Operators and supervisors (shift engineers) shall only have access to the “operator workplace” and never to the I&C-system or operating system (e.g. Windows, UNIX) level
What should the operators be allowed to personalize/customize?
Operators and supervisors must be able to perform all necessary changes to control and monitor the plant via the “operator workplace” (in mimic displays, faceplates or specific masks/windows). This includes changing of operational setpoints, if necessary thresholds or limits and the possibility to create “ad hoc” trend displays by means of preconfigured (canned) trend templates. Also “ad hoc” calculations should be possible by means of predefined formulas resp. masks.
9. Implementation cont. (3b) Handling control rooms that are “easier” to change? – (MF)
Different levels of security/access
An at least two dimensional access right scheme must be implemented, which assigns specific access rights (read and/or write) to clear defined roles to the different applications and system levels. If possible, roles should be limited to specific physical work stations, e.g. logging in in the operator role should be only possible at work stations in the control room (operational security), logging in as an engineer should be only possible at desigbated engineering work stations in secured areas (cyber security).
Need for audit trail, Need to track who has access as roles change
The I&C system should automatically log all activities, e.g. operator actions on the workplace in the “event” list / protocol (in German: Stör- und Schaltprotokoll), configuration activities of maintenance personell should be logged in a maintenance protokol (if the system does not have such a capability a “log book” should be maintained on a specific node of the respective I&C system)
10. Implementation cont. (3c) Handling control rooms that are “easier” to change? – (MF)
Organize the data workflow, traceability to analysis, paper trail for an audit
A clear defined procedure (possibly computer supported but not in the I&C-system) must be established for all modifications on the system (base, application, mimics, setpoints other than operational setpoints (e.g. tuning constants) which influence the
Rules for changes on control room (resp. I&C-systems) systems
Only the assigned roles are to be allowed to do the modifications assigned to a role. Acces to the system must be in a secure way. In multitrain (redundant) safety systems access for chanching or downloading data must only be possible to one train at a time to avoid CCF. Access to a next train shall only be released if the previous accessed channel is back in nomal operational mode.
Who owns the data
The organizational unit which is responsible for the correctness and integrity of the data, e.g. engineering for engineering and configuration data, operation for process data incl. historical data etc.