1 / 23

Klamath Distribution Model: Preliminary Results & Effects on Basin Areas

This study presents preliminary findings from three additional model runs, separating the Klamath Basin into two areas for analysis. The impacts of instream claims, project claims, ESA requirements, and tribal deferments are assessed on different segments of the basin. The results highlight the effects on lake levels, monthly deliveries, and yearly allocations. By comparing various runs, the study provides insights into the influence of different factors on water distribution in the Klamath Basin.

klong
Download Presentation

Klamath Distribution Model: Preliminary Results & Effects on Basin Areas

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Klamath Distribution Model Preliminary Results

  2. Three Additional Model Runs • Separate Basin into two areas- Above Klamath Lake and • Klamath Lake to Iron Gate. (Run 5) • Turn Instream Claims above Klamath Lake off. • Using Adjudicators Preliminary Findings for • Instream Claims

  3. General Results with basin separated. • Isolates effects of lake level claims and project claims on upper basin.

  4. Run 2 (D5) • All Irrigation Claims On, Tribal Instream and Lake Level Claims On (Riparian), ESA Requirements OFF, Basin Divided in two- Above Klamath Lake and Below Klamath Lake

  5. Run 3 • All Irrigation Claims On, Tribal Instream and Lake Level Claims (Riparian) Defer to “-1864” Priority Group, ESA Requirements Off

  6. Comparison of Runs 1 and 2 • Effects of ESA Requirements

  7. General ESA Effects Above Klamath Lake

  8. General ESA Effects Below Klamath Lake

  9. General ESA Effects on Lake Levels

  10. General ESA Effects on Lake Levels

  11. Examples of ESA Effects on Monthly Average Deliveries Results Typical for Sycan, Lower Sprague, Lower Williamson, Modoc, and Williamson Delta Areas

  12. Examples of ESA Effects on Monthly Average Deliveries

  13. Examples of ESA Effects on Monthly Average Deliveries

  14. Examples of ESA Effects on Monthly Average Deliveries Results Typical for Areas Below Klamath Lake

  15. Comparison of Run 1 and 3 • Effects of Tribal Claims Deferring to “-1864” Priority Group

  16. General Tribal Deference Effects Above Klamath Lake

  17. General Tribal Deference Effects Below Klamath Lake

  18. General Tribal Deference Effects on Lake Levels

  19. Examples of Tribal Deference on Yearly Deliveries

  20. Examples of Tribal Deference on Yearly Deliveries

  21. Examples of Tribal Deference on Yearly Deliveries

  22. Examples of Tribal Deference on Monthly Deliveries Results Typical in all Other Sub-Basins Above Klamath Lake

  23. Examples of Tribal Deference on Monthly Deliveries Results Typical in all Other Sub-Basins Below Klamath Lake

More Related