80 likes | 180 Views
Changes in FIDEL LHC models in 2010. P. Hagen February 2010. Summary of changes for 2010. Phys. Rev. ST Accel . Beams 12 102401 (27.10.2009). MQWB saga continues. These curves are BL(I) and not TF(I) ! First curve shows 0 to 200 A ( I_GEO ) The next curve shows 0 to 6 A.
E N D
Changes in FIDEL LHC models in 2010 P. Hagen February 2010
MQWB saga continues These curves are BL(I) and not TF(I) !First curve shows 0 to 200 A ( I_GEO ) The next curve shows0 to 6 A The fit curve becomesquickly unphysical belowlowest meas point at 1Awhere RESMAG = 16 000 units of TFgeo Therefore I have in 2010modified IRNG_LOW=1 Afor the 2 circuitsoperating in this range,and IRNG_LOW=10 Aotherwise + fine tuningof RESMAG curves
New MBXW S/T measurements show some difference wrt HALL integrals 3 similar magnet families with essentially only different field direction (H/V) and magnetic length: MBXWS lm=0.82, MBXWT lm=1.57, MBXWH lm=3.43 where lm taken from average of measurements.
Measurements of MBXWS 3 with SSW Proposed change • The spread in HALL measurements is often small • and when not small it looks more like 1 of 3 outlier • So why not use the SSW to represent all 3 magnets !
Measurements of MBXWT 2 with SSW Proposed change • Assume spread is due to measurement issues • Use the SSW to represent all 3 magnets ! • The saturation is underestimated in the FIDEL curve