250 likes | 436 Views
How Remittances solve the Unholy Trinity. Singer, David Andrew. 2010. Migrant Remittances and Exchange Rate Regimes in the Developing World. American Political Science Review 104 (2): 307-323. Plan for today. Why emigrate? Remittances Countercyclical Fixed Exchange Rate (Fixed XR)
E N D
How Remittances solve the Unholy Trinity Singer, David Andrew. 2010. Migrant Remittances and Exchange Rate Regimes in the Developing World. American Political Science Review 104 (2): 307-323.
Plan for today • Why emigrate? Remittances • Countercyclical • Fixed Exchange Rate (Fixed XR) • A Triangle • Will change the way you see international political economy! • Testing the argument • How to read statistical results -- a cheat sheet
Previously in class: • Who is against immigration? • Answer: • People who face job competition from immigrants • The scarce factor of production • (Also: cultural values matter) • This class: Why are the immigrants here?
Remittances! • A lifeline for poor countries • A sizeable share of GDP • >15% of GDP for: • El Salvador • Haiti • Honduras • Jordan • >5% of GDP for 42 countries in 2004. • Global flows: $318 billion in 2007 • > other important external financial sources (ODA, bank lending, private investment)
3 films where Chinese immigration plays a role: Scarface… Asian-style! Chinese immigrants in Japan Chinese immigrants in Barcelona Chinese (and other Asian) migration to the United States
Why <3 remittances? • Unrequited • Don’t have to pay them back • No obligations • Cannot be withdrawn • No capital flight • Most importantly for this lesson… • … • COUNTERCYCLICAL!!!
Countercyclical • When times are good back home, migrants send less money • But when times are hard, migrants send more money • Example: If a natural disaster hits, migrants send more money home in a hurry! • But what if the value of what you send home keeps varying? • uncertainty • Maybe migrants send less $$$ under uncertainty • (Maybe the value of what they send drops) • Solution: • FIXED EXCHANGE RATES (XR)
Fixed XR • Provides certainty for international exchanges • trade & financial exchanges • But it comes at a cost: • Monetary policy • And now… • A TRIANGLE
Free Capital Flow Inconsistent/Unholy Trinity Or “Trilemma”: a country can only have 2 out of 3 of these Fixed Exchange Rate Sovereign Monetary Policy
Fixed Exchange Rate The Trilemma Open Capital Flows Sovereign Monetary Policy
Fixed Exchange Rate The Trilemma Open Capital Flows Sovereign Monetary Policy
Argument • In an open-economy, fixed XR takes away monetary policy autonomy • Without monetary policy autonomy, governments cannot take countercyclical measures against (alternatively) • unemployment • inflation • But remittances flow counter-cyclically! • Fixed XR help bring in remittances*** • Remittances address cyclic problems of unemployment/inflation!
Test the argument! (Side note: Do fixed exchange rates lead to more remittances? Essay topic!)
A simple guide to How to read basic “regression” results • What is the analysis “explaining”? Dependent variable, usually in the title of the table • What is the unit of analysis? How many observations… of what? (In most IPE studies: “country-years”) • What is the effect of each independent (explanatory) variable? Just ask: Is the “coefficient” positive/negative? • Are the effects statistically significant? • Star-gazing *, **, *** • Is the standard error <1/2 the size of the coefficient? • OR: is the t-stat/z-stat >1.96? • OR: is the p-value<0.05?
Check list: • What is the dependent variable (the thing we want to explain – usually in the table’s title)? • What is the unit of analysis (the nature of the observations)? • What are the independent variables of interest? • Main independent variable(s) • Control variables • What are their effects? In a non-linear model, just look for “positive” or “negative” COEFFICIENTS • Is the model linear or non-linear? • How confident are we in each effect? 3 ways to report: (star gazing) • Standard error: 95% significant if < ½ the size of the coefficient… really <1/1.96) • T-stat (or Z-stat): 95% significant if >1.96 • p-value: 95% significant if < 0.05
Instrumental variable approach? • What if people are more likely to send $$$ home if the XR is fixed? • Argument is: Remittances Fixed XR • But it might really be: Fixed XR Remittances • Possible “endogeneity” ! • (Or mutual causation) • To test this, we can perform a quasi-experiment • Find something correlated with remittances, but not directly related with the XR • E.g., Emigration rates • Emigration Remittances • But no direct relationship between emigration and XR • (You could challenge this) • So any relationship between emigration and XR captures the effect of remittances on XR, removing possible “endogeneity.”
Take-aways • Why emigrate? Remittances • Countercyclical • Fixed Exchange Rate (Fixed XR) –vs- Floating XR • The Unholy Trinity / Inconsistent trinity / TRILEMMA • How to read statistical results -- a cheat sheet • (Instrument / Instrumental Variable)