1 / 25

Experience from Norwegian pilot projects

Mutual Quality Enhancement and Innovation in University and Companies - through Integration of Research and Continuing Education. Experience from Norwegian pilot projects Toril Eikaas Eide, Centre for Continuing Education, UiB, Norway. Pilot projects co-operated by two Norwegian universities:.

kura
Download Presentation

Experience from Norwegian pilot projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mutual Quality Enhancement and Innovationin University and Companies -through Integration of Research and Continuing Education. Experience from Norwegian pilot projects Toril Eikaas Eide, Centre for Continuing Education, UiB, Norway

  2. Pilot projects co-operated by two Norwegian universities: • The Norwegian University for Life Sciences (UMB) • The University of Bergen (UiB) Managed by their respective ’Centre for Continuing Education’,(SEVU), here represented by: Toril Eikaas Eide, Adviser, SEVU, UiB.

  3. Project background – motivation – challenges: • Companies:Limited scale of LLL and University Continuing Education (UCE) activity • University and company:Little experience from applying recent research results directly/quickly in professional development in companies • University:Limited knowledge about real life and important challenges in companies, - and about their need for competence development

  4. Background – motivation – challenges (cont.): • UiB: Too little direct feedback from companies about their problems and demands for knowledge • UMB: Not sufficiently following up / implementing results of research when collaborating with companies (criticism in customers’ survey) • Collaboration fragmented - between university and companies – not integrated or functioning as a whole

  5. Overall project quality aim: To stimulate increased innovation • through a more wholistic and long-term collaboration in research and professional development between university and companies (economic life / working life)

  6. Project aim(cont.): Stimulate learning and competence development through • collaboration • exchange of experience • mutual knowledge construction innovation = quality improvement in: • Company • Network of companies, • University, • Region

  7. ’Innovation’ / quality enhancement seen as: • New products • New / changed processes, working methods • Models/methods of organising work and working place – in company / university • Pedagogical development

  8. Core project feature: • Running continuing education activities / professional development  • in networks of regional companies • combined with and/or integrated in research or R&D projects * Supported by The Research Council of Norway

  9. Four pilot projects – two each: • Roses and cucumber (UMB) • Cod health in fry and brood fish production (UiB) • Operational meteorology (UiB) • wawe theory and wave forecasting • extreme events(forecasting of wind/precipitation) • Competence development in social and cultural entrepreneurship in Aurland (UMB)

  10. Four pilot projects - two each • Roses and Cucumber • Cod health in production of • Extreme weather (Oceanography

  11. What did we do – and how? Our model for our practical approach:

  12. Pilot project aims: • Establish arenas for wholistic and long-range R&D collaboration between companies and university • Mutual competence development between companies and university through • Dialogue • Mutual exchange of practical and theoretical knowledge and experience • Joint planning, development, running and evaluation of • Concrete learning activities/courses • Research projects

  13. Our model for mutual and double loop learning Theory + new research problems COMMON LEARNING PLACE Research results Theory-based Research institute Company Increased competence Increased competence KNOWLEDGE Experience-based innovation Practice + new problems

  14. SEVU’s role: • Project leader • Process leader and facilitator • Pedagogical coach and adviser • Evaluator

  15. Practical approach:Integrating professional development activity in R&D collaboration: At the beginning of the project: strengthen the users’ competence basis to participate actively in the project In the course of the project: establish meeting places for systematic and mutual learning and exchange of experience Towards the end of the project: tailor learning activities for groups of employees to support practical implementation of new knowledge

  16. Pedagogical approach: • Learner based • Problem based – work place / company • Experience based • Theory based

  17. MODEL FOR COLLABORATIVE CONSTRUCTION OF KNOWLEDGE IN R&D PROJECTS • EXPERIMENTS • In production halls • In laboratories PLANNING New experiments? New research problems? New action in the company? PRELIMINARY RESULTS Dialogue between researchers and collaborators (ie company managers and supervisors) representing Theory-based and Experience-based knowledge GENERAL CONCLUSIONS INTERPRETATION ANALYSIS

  18. Results and outcome - quality enhancement: More traditional outcome: • Courses • Learning materials • Meetings Company representatives report: • Increased knowledge • More focus on and real change of working practices • Improved and more frequent contact and dialogue with university • Easier to contact university • Increased interest in research initiatives and results

  19. Results and outcome - quality enhancement(cont.): University representatives / faculty report (cont.): • Easier to contact companies • Increased knowledge about working practices and challenges in companies • Improved and more frequent contact and dialogue with companies • New experience with applying problem based learning (PBL) in work place / companies • Feasible with immediate integration of research results in courses • - and also quickly let practical experience in companies influence research

  20. Results and outcome - quality enhancement (cont.): University representatives / faculty report (cont.): • Permanent areas for dialogue with companies • Better access to more and interesting research materials • Input from companies about possible / necessary research fields • Establishing (and funding) more research projects

  21. Results and outcome - quality enhancement(cont.): Centre for continuing education (SEVU): • Improved and more frequent contact between SEVU and research groups - which stimulates and facilitates more courses and professional development initiatives • New experience with applying problem based learning (PBL) in work place / companies • Experience with and learning from trying out new roles and tasks

  22. Results and outcome - quality enhancement(cont.): Centre for continuing education (SEVU): • Improved competency in managing and facilitating learning processes - and coaching faculty • Promotion of SEVUs competency, functions and tasks to new users: • Companies (external) • Faculty and departments at the university (internal) Particularly positive feedback about the usefulness of the function/role as process leaders!

  23. Thank you!

  24. Questions?Comments?Other input?Similar projects?Your experience?

More Related